You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #83: You only think so because the insult wasn't addressed to you. n/t [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #81
83. You only think so because the insult wasn't addressed to you. n/t
Edited on Thu Dec-07-06 04:04 PM by mhatrw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -The Mahablog >> Dear Conspiracy Theorists greyl  Dec-07-06 12:48 AM   #0 
  - Fallacious overgeneralization. I know a few conspiracy  petgoat   Dec-07-06 01:30 AM   #1 
  - She's talking about inside job cultists.  greyl   Dec-07-06 02:04 AM   #2 
     - OK...  quickesst   Dec-07-06 05:53 AM   #3 
     - Great post quickesst  HamdenRice   Dec-07-06 07:06 AM   #4 
     - No, it's not a symmetric situation at all  William Seger   Dec-07-06 08:17 AM   #6 
     - OCTers and OCTabots are too close minded to actually review the evidence  HamdenRice   Dec-07-06 08:51 AM   #8 
     - Bullshit  William Seger   Dec-07-06 11:08 AM   #13 
        - Your rhetoric expertly proves my point -- you are the perfect example  HamdenRice   Dec-07-06 11:38 AM   #15 
        - Sorry you wasted your time  William Seger   Dec-07-06 11:59 AM   #17 
        - Ha ha ha ha !!! That's just what I predicted! I'm so way cool!  HamdenRice   Dec-07-06 12:09 PM   #18 
        - Oooo, maniacal laughter; very convincing  William Seger   Dec-07-06 01:36 PM   #21 
           - And you also failed ...  HamdenRice   Dec-07-06 01:49 PM   #25 
              - Yes, I did  William Seger   Dec-07-06 02:03 PM   #35 
                 - How about one at a time  HamdenRice   Dec-07-06 02:14 PM   #46 
                    - How about stick to the topic, or start your own thread.  William Seger   Dec-07-06 03:26 PM   #75 
                       - I thought you are so well informed that you would know the ISI "theory"  HamdenRice   Dec-07-06 04:08 PM   #85 
                          - That's your "inside job" theory? Jeez....  William Seger   Dec-07-06 04:40 PM   #87 
                          - Now that would be bright thing for an intelligence chief to do  HamdenRice   Dec-07-06 04:57 PM   #88 
                             - "Official theory?" "Documented facts?"  William Seger   Dec-07-06 07:27 PM   #89 
                          - Clarify something.  greyl   Dec-07-06 11:11 PM   #92 
                             - Well, that's the entire point isn't it?  HamdenRice   Dec-08-06 07:25 AM   #99 
                                - Are you now, or have you ever been, an "inside job cultist"?  William Seger   Dec-08-06 09:17 AM   #100 
                                - It's difficult to believe that those  greyl   Dec-08-06 11:45 AM   #105 
        - I stopped reading right there.  frylock   Dec-07-06 12:18 PM   #19 
        - Exhibit A in closemindedness. n/t  mhatrw   Dec-07-06 02:02 PM   #34 
        - Point by point  William Seger   Dec-08-06 10:44 AM   #102 
        - That's it, trust your government to tell you the truth  softwarevotingtrail   Dec-07-06 12:25 PM   #20 
        - There's huge difference between straw argument and calling  greyl   Dec-07-06 02:06 PM   #39 
        - Exhibit B in closemindedness. n/t  mhatrw   Dec-07-06 02:00 PM   #32 
        - If every....  quickesst   Dec-08-06 05:57 AM   #97 
           - You want another investigation?  William Seger   Dec-08-06 10:50 AM   #103 
              - Of course...  quickesst   Dec-08-06 04:13 PM   #114 
     - try this modifcarion to your thought experiment:  petgoat   Dec-07-06 02:03 PM   #36 
        - "a few shaky allegations"?  William Seger   Dec-08-06 11:05 AM   #104 
           - OCT apologists always fall back on the  petgoat   Dec-08-06 11:51 AM   #106 
     - It doesn't matter how amazed you are.  greyl   Dec-07-06 02:00 PM   #33 
     - Of course. Do you admit the possibility that it was? n/t  mhatrw   Dec-07-06 02:05 PM   #37 
     - Really? & was I asking you?  greyl   Dec-07-06 02:08 PM   #42 
        - You & Maha appeared to be asking everyone who doubts the OCT.  mhatrw   Dec-07-06 02:25 PM   #53 
           - Feel free to edit your post when you find the answer in this thread.  greyl   Dec-07-06 02:39 PM   #59 
              - Do you think 9/11 could have been an inside job or not?  mhatrw   Dec-07-06 03:03 PM   #68 
                 - Yes, it's possible.  greyl   Dec-07-06 11:15 PM   #93 
     - Yes...  wildbilln864   Dec-07-06 02:07 PM   #40 
        - You're contradicting yourself.  greyl   Dec-07-06 02:10 PM   #44 
           - Contradicting myself? If you say so but...  wildbilln864   Dec-07-06 02:13 PM   #45 
              - Yes, I say so, and  greyl   Dec-07-06 02:18 PM   #49 
                 - well, I agree there isn't much evidence yet...  wildbilln864   Dec-07-06 02:23 PM   #52 
                    - Nor is there any hard evidence of the OCT. n/t  mhatrw   Dec-07-06 02:26 PM   #54 
                       - There is an absolutely overwhelming consensus  greyl   Dec-07-06 02:32 PM   #56 
                       - consensus....  wildbilln864   Dec-07-06 02:35 PM   #58 
                       - You're missing my point.  greyl   Dec-07-06 02:41 PM   #60 
                       - False premise -- there is not an overwhelming consensus  HamdenRice   Dec-07-06 02:51 PM   #65 
                       - Wrong.  greyl   Dec-07-06 02:58 PM   #67 
                          - Your own words prove you wrong  HamdenRice   Dec-07-06 03:07 PM   #71 
                             - No, they don't. Pay attention.  greyl   Dec-07-06 03:26 PM   #76 
                                - changing your assertions in the middle of a debate?  HamdenRice   Dec-07-06 04:14 PM   #86 
                                   - No, I don't think you ever understood them.  greyl   Dec-07-06 11:06 PM   #91 
                       - I didn't say anything about a consensus.  mhatrw   Dec-07-06 03:05 PM   #69 
                          - Do most lay people believe the basic aspects of the OCT?  greyl   Dec-07-06 11:22 PM   #94 
                             - Wrong. There is no strong evidence, fake or otherwise, for the OCT.  mhatrw   Dec-08-06 12:24 PM   #108 
                                - I don't think you understand what consensus means, nor  greyl   Dec-08-06 12:34 PM   #110 
                                - Wrong. Read the 9/11 Commission report appendices  William Seger   Dec-08-06 01:54 PM   #112 
                       - exactly...  wildbilln864   Dec-07-06 02:32 PM   #57 
     - Not really...  quickesst   Dec-08-06 06:01 AM   #98 
     - You're confusing the terms "truth seeker" & "Truth-seeker" and  greyl   Dec-07-06 01:55 PM   #28 
        - You don't need to tell me that OTC defenders rely on  mhatrw   Dec-07-06 02:08 PM   #41 
           - Show me where I did what you accuse me of. nt  greyl   Dec-07-06 02:48 PM   #63 
           - "You don't need to tell me that CTists are rarely moved by logic."  mhatrw   Dec-07-06 03:07 PM   #70 
              - How is that a  greyl   Dec-07-06 04:00 PM   #82 
                 - Let's see. By definition? n/t  mhatrw   Dec-08-06 12:28 PM   #109 
     - overgeneralization  RedSock   Dec-07-06 11:40 AM   #16 
     - Nah.  greyl   Dec-07-06 01:49 PM   #24 
        - Exactly, just like Kramer wasn't talking about all black people! n/t  mhatrw   Dec-07-06 02:09 PM   #43 
     - "How can a specified group be an overgeneralization?"  petgoat   Dec-07-06 02:05 PM   #38 
        - You need to consider more than the title.  greyl   Dec-07-06 02:21 PM   #51 
           - If I entitle a piece "Dear Christians" and follow with  petgoat   Dec-07-06 02:43 PM   #61 
              - If in that piece you were to begin using the term  greyl   Dec-07-06 02:46 PM   #62 
              - exactly, with such obvious...  wildbilln864   Dec-07-06 02:49 PM   #64 
  - just as the official story cultists are incapable of discussion as well  elias7   Dec-07-06 07:23 AM   #5 
  - Define your terms, who are "the cultists"? who are "they"?  softwarevotingtrail   Dec-07-06 08:47 AM   #7 
  - I think this is a good point  vincent_vega_lives   Dec-07-06 09:53 AM   #9 
  - So suspicion about 9-11 culpability is "wishful thinking?"  softwarevotingtrail   Dec-07-06 10:54 AM   #12 
  - It's just like Iraq with some people  mogster   Dec-07-06 10:02 AM   #10 
  - Conversations at Ground Zero  vincent_vega_lives   Dec-07-06 10:25 AM   #11 
  - Trouble is, is that it was both an inside and outside job  savemefromdumbya   Dec-07-06 11:15 AM   #14 
  - more bullshit!  wildbilln864   Dec-07-06 01:38 PM   #22 
  - Ignoring the possibilities...  boloboffin   Dec-07-06 01:44 PM   #23 
     - Is that the only theory of complicity you are familiar with?  HamdenRice   Dec-07-06 01:52 PM   #26 
     - I'm just exploring parameters, Hamden.  boloboffin   Dec-07-06 01:57 PM   #29 
     - get a grip!  wildbilln864   Dec-07-06 01:55 PM   #27 
     - I'm not saying anyone did!  boloboffin   Dec-07-06 01:57 PM   #31 
     - You are comparing this to thinking that Osama may not be  mhatrw   Dec-07-06 02:16 PM   #48 
     - Um, no. Thanks for misrepresenting what I'm saying, though. n/t  boloboffin   Dec-07-06 02:55 PM   #66 
        - Retreat!  mhatrw   Dec-07-06 03:14 PM   #73 
           - Not at all.  boloboffin   Dec-07-06 03:19 PM   #74 
              - Sure you were. n/t  mhatrw   Dec-07-06 03:36 PM   #79 
     - Stop covering up THE TRUTH!!!!  silvermachine   Dec-08-06 02:48 PM   #113 
  - I'm so happy that Maha respects me.  mhatrw   Dec-07-06 01:57 PM   #30 
  - I'm impressed by the outpouring of emotion.  greyl   Dec-07-06 02:16 PM   #47 
  - Were you impressed that blacks were offended by Michael Richards as well?  mhatrw   Dec-07-06 02:19 PM   #50 
     - That's irrelevant to this discussion.  greyl   Dec-07-06 02:30 PM   #55 
        - Grey.  mhatrw   Dec-07-06 03:12 PM   #72 
           - If you aren't an inside job cultist, try not to let it bother you. nt  greyl   Dec-07-06 03:29 PM   #77 
              - Which brings us back to Michael Richards.  mhatrw   Dec-07-06 03:32 PM   #78 
                 - Your analogy was never close to appropriate.  greyl   Dec-07-06 03:58 PM   #81 
                    - You only think so because the insult wasn't addressed to you. n/t  mhatrw   Dec-07-06 04:03 PM   #83 
                       - Oh brother. Is being an inside job cultist a choice?  greyl   Dec-07-06 11:27 PM   #95 
                          - Not the gravity. The backtracking technique.  mhatrw   Dec-08-06 12:21 PM   #107 
                             - Your posts on this particular topic are increasingly unimpressive.  greyl   Dec-08-06 12:37 PM   #111 
  - Thanks for posting, greyl...  SidDithers   Dec-07-06 03:51 PM   #80 
  - Because this will facilitate openmindedness.  mhatrw   Dec-07-06 04:06 PM   #84 
  - See post 8...nt  SidDithers   Dec-07-06 10:52 PM   #90 
  - no sweat nt  greyl   Jan-29-07 06:18 AM   #115 
  - The 9/11 Truth movement is close-minded  Anarcho-Socialist   Dec-08-06 12:15 AM   #96 
     - Yes! Holographic Towers! I had a whole thread proving this once.  MervinFerd   Dec-08-06 10:27 AM   #101 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC