You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #8: I can understand calling "no planes at the WTC" idiocy, [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. I can understand calling "no planes at the WTC" idiocy,
but the Pentagon..
Let me just say that i find the evidence supporting a plane at the pentagon ever so slightly less convincing than the evidence supporting planes at the WTC...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Has Participation in the 9/11 Forum Changed or Shaped your Views? HamdenRice  Dec-06-06 12:15 PM   #0 
  - When the attack first occurred  jschurchin   Dec-06-06 01:09 PM   #1 
  - Whoever brought down the buildings  DoYouEverWonder   Dec-06-06 05:00 PM   #4 
     - Let me test somthing  vincent_vega_lives   Dec-15-06 08:15 AM   #38 
  - It just makes me depressed...  silvermachine   Dec-06-06 02:49 PM   #2 
  - I can understand calling "no planes at the WTC" idiocy,  rman   Dec-07-06 03:30 AM   #8 
  - Thanks for a civil reply...  silvermachine   Dec-13-06 10:29 AM   #11 
  - You should edit your post.  Make7   Dec-13-06 10:54 AM   #12 
     - OK thanks...  silvermachine   Dec-13-06 10:58 AM   #14 
     - OK...  silvermachine   Dec-13-06 11:01 AM   #15 
        - Sometimes....  Make7   Dec-13-06 11:55 AM   #17 
  - Have you looked at that day's footage?  mirandapriestly   Dec-13-06 01:30 PM   #20 
  - I must admit  rman   Dec-13-06 01:50 PM   #22 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-13-06 03:15 PM   #23 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-15-06 01:27 AM   #32 
  - Where did I quote any  mirandapriestly   Dec-15-06 10:35 AM   #42 
  - Yah know?  vincent_vega_lives   Dec-15-06 08:26 AM   #41 
  - I just find it amazing  vincent_vega_lives   Dec-15-06 08:24 AM   #40 
  - why?eom..  mirandapriestly   Dec-15-06 01:39 AM   #34 
  - One of the problems with this is the definition of "official story"  boloboffin   Dec-06-06 03:41 PM   #3 
  - I think 9/1 was an inside job, but that doesn't mean I think the  John Q. Citizen   Dec-13-06 12:53 PM   #19 
  - Only Bush and Rumsfeld  CJCRANE   Dec-14-06 03:24 PM   #26 
  - I voted the same as you  KJF   Dec-07-06 01:49 AM   #5 
  - One of the OCTs checked the first one  mirandapriestly   Dec-07-06 02:50 AM   #6 
  - How uncharitable of you, miranda.  boloboffin   Dec-07-06 03:05 AM   #7 
     - when you say "CTers" I think of you guys  mirandapriestly   Dec-13-06 10:57 AM   #13 
        - I've become stronger in my views because of the OCTS  mirandapriestly   Dec-13-06 11:03 AM   #16 
           - It's a symbiotic relationship, to be sure. Every time someone bashes  John Q. Citizen   Dec-13-06 12:24 PM   #18 
  - I haven't participated here, but only lurked  leftstreet   Dec-09-06 01:43 AM   #9 
  - not primarily due to this forum, but  leftofthedial   Dec-09-06 02:29 AM   #10 
  - Every time I come here I see more questions raised and get more  treestar   Dec-13-06 01:39 PM   #21 
  - Please do your best to get out of all jury duty required of you.  boloboffin   Dec-13-06 04:18 PM   #24 
  - boloboffin, with all due respect, about 99% of the threads  John Q. Citizen   Dec-13-06 07:37 PM   #25 
     - Actually...  boloboffin   Dec-14-06 08:47 PM   #29 
     - Well bush worked his way through My Pet Goat, and he's probably  John Q. Citizen   Dec-14-06 10:08 PM   #31 
     - Good point  mirandapriestly   Dec-15-06 02:40 AM   #37 
  - Well said, it's like some kind of "brain washing"  mirandapriestly   Dec-15-06 02:38 AM   #36 
  - I vote for 1 & 2 (n/t)  vincent_vega_lives   Dec-15-06 08:17 AM   #39 
  - It has told me that there can be other uses for bunny cages too n/t  Anarcho-Socialist   Dec-14-06 04:42 PM   #27 
  - Yes. It tells me that disinfo is killing the interest in real questions  newsdude   Dec-14-06 08:18 PM   #28 
  - Yeah, no shit  Lilith Velkor   Dec-14-06 10:00 PM   #30 
  - I read only 16% now believe the bush CT  mirandapriestly   Dec-15-06 01:38 AM   #33 
     - Why don't you spell it out instead of playing silly games? n/t  AZCat   Dec-15-06 01:40 AM   #35 
     - It's at 31% who believe the official explanation in this poll miranda,  John Q. Citizen   Dec-16-06 12:15 PM   #43 
     - It's also the Kucinich CT, fyi. nt  greyl   Dec-16-06 01:57 PM   #44 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC