You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #47: Only to someone that already believes that. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
Make7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. Only to someone that already believes that.
I did find information that Flight 77 took off from Dulles between 8:20am and 8:21am. You seem to believe that the research done by others into the BTS and FAA aircraft registry databases actually proves something one way or the other. However, the conclusions of those other researchers based on that information leads to some obvious questions that I don't recall ever being addressed.

  • Why would actual flights be used for UA175 and UA93 and not be used for AA11 and AA77?

  • Why would the FAA registry be updated to show N334AA and N644AA as destroyed after a few months, but the registration for N612UA and N591UA wouldn't be canceled until years later?

  • Why would anyone use databases that use information supplied by the airlines themselves as proof when the radar data, ATC communications, FDR data for N644AA, and DNA evidence indicates that the information in the databases is simply incorrect and/or not adequately updated?


Nozebro wrote:
I wonder who "cooked" the databooks in '04 and who held the gun to Mineta's head & told him to get it done?

Let me get this straight. You claim that 9/11 was not a conspiracy, yet you think someone forced Mineta to "cook" the BTS database in 2004? So they weren't conspiring to cover something up?


Nozebro claimed:
Re: conspiracy. NO, 9/11 wasn't a conspiracy and boosh certainly would never say that.

Really?

Our country must also remain on the offensive against terrorism here at home. The enemy has not lost the desire or capability to attack us. Fortunately, this nation has superb professionals in law enforcement, intelligence, the military, and homeland security. These men and women are dedicating their lives, protecting us all, and they deserve our support and our thanks. They also deserve the same tools they already use to fight drug trafficking and organized crime -- so I ask you to reauthorize the Patriot Act.

It is said that prior to the attacks of September the 11th, our government failed to connect the dots of the conspiracy. We now know that two of the hijackers in the United States placed telephone calls to al Qaeda operatives overseas. But we did not know about their plans until it was too late. So to prevent another attack - based on authority given to me by the Constitution and by statute - I have authorized a terrorist surveillance program to aggressively pursue the international communications of suspected al Qaeda operatives and affiliates to and from America.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/stateoftheunion/2006/index.html

What conspiracy was he talking about then?

- Make7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -the plane that hit the Pentagon LSK  Nov-23-06 12:11 AM   #0 
  - Why no one saw it "spiral down"?  bushatbooker   Nov-23-06 12:29 AM   #1 
  - Supposedly the pilot of a C-130H saw the 757.  petgoat   Nov-23-06 12:53 PM   #9 
     - Looks like that aircraft crashed into the Pentagon, sir.  Nozebro   Nov-23-06 01:49 PM   #10 
     - C130 surveillance plane  savemefromdumbya   Nov-23-06 11:29 PM   #12 
     - Several witnesses said they saw another plane  mirandapriestly   Nov-25-06 12:20 AM   #33 
  - Check out Pilots for 9/11 Truth:  Beam Me Up   Nov-23-06 01:23 AM   #2 
  - My guess  G Hawes   Nov-23-06 01:29 AM   #3 
  - Yes, that Hani Hanfour was a crack pilot by all accounts  mirandapriestly   Nov-23-06 03:14 AM   #4 
     - Hani was the best pilot ever. We lost an ace on 9/11  DrDebug   Nov-23-06 03:47 AM   #5 
     - No, he wasn't a particularly good pilot  G Hawes   Nov-24-06 12:25 AM   #14 
     - I don't think he was a particularly good pilot  G Hawes   Nov-24-06 12:18 AM   #13 
        - Do you ever muse about the redunancy of the 'sarcasm' tags?  canetoad   Nov-24-06 08:43 PM   #27 
        - Oh, that explains why  mirandapriestly   Nov-24-06 08:48 PM   #28 
           - 2 trillion dollars got "lost" because of the missing budget info....  Joanne98   Nov-25-06 09:45 AM   #38 
  - I think the official story took the flight path for the C130  DoYouEverWonder   Nov-23-06 04:06 AM   #6 
  - it had to hit the section that was  Brundle_Fly   Nov-23-06 11:03 AM   #7 
  - It also hit the "accounting and finance" section of the Pentagon  Ezlivin   Nov-24-06 10:46 AM   #22 
  - About that "plane" -- don't you think if AA 77 had hit the Pentagon, we'd  Nozebro   Nov-23-06 11:14 AM   #8 
  - The BTS database lists it as scheduled to depart at 8:10 am on 9/11/01.  Make7   Nov-24-06 10:38 AM   #21 
     - Thanks. When did they add that data? And, since you're such a good  Nozebro   Nov-24-06 11:10 AM   #23 
     - You've got it all backwards.  Make7   Nov-24-06 07:17 PM   #24 
        - I recall seeing a copy of the BTS records which did NOT list AA 77 as  Nozebro   Nov-24-06 08:04 PM   #26 
        - Let me try this again.  Make7   Nov-25-06 03:57 PM   #43 
           - Thanks. That helps firm up even more the truthfulness of charges that  Nozebro   Nov-25-06 05:01 PM   #44 
           - Only to someone that already believes that.  Make7   Nov-26-06 05:47 PM   #47 
           - Holy crap, those are all examples of that poster using "OCT"?  SidDithers   Nov-25-06 05:11 PM   #45 
              - Yes, and that's not all of them. Yet he asks me: "what exactly is an "OCT'er"?"  Make7   Nov-26-06 06:05 PM   #48 
        - 2002?  savemefromdumbya   Nov-25-06 12:11 AM   #31 
           - The date the paper work was approved.  hack89   Nov-25-06 08:35 AM   #34 
     - depends what one means by 'depart'  savemefromdumbya   Nov-25-06 12:08 AM   #30 
  - the plane that DIDN'T hit the Pentagon  savemefromdumbya   Nov-23-06 11:27 PM   #11 
  - so your saying flight 77 never took off?  LSK   Nov-24-06 01:19 AM   #15 
     - nobody  savemefromdumbya   Nov-25-06 12:05 AM   #29 
     - If it did take off, there should be BTS records of that, but unless they've  Nozebro   Nov-25-06 09:03 AM   #36 
     - She's in the Bahamas with Ken Lay.  Joanne98   Nov-25-06 09:52 AM   #40 
     - Not Cleveland. Area 51. Olson et. al. now occupy the same freezer  reprobate   Nov-25-06 11:54 PM   #46 
  - And lets not forget after the plane supposedly hit,  Larry Ogg   Nov-24-06 02:17 AM   #16 
  - The way they reacted to the fires was also odd  DoYouEverWonder   Nov-24-06 04:56 AM   #17 
  - It only makes sense if the boosh 911 CT is a lie. Then, it makes plenty of  Nozebro   Nov-24-06 08:41 AM   #19 
     - Professional advocates?...Why, Nozebro, what are you suggesting?...nt  SidDithers   Nov-24-06 07:52 PM   #25 
        - He's making a general comment about those who are  mirandapriestly   Nov-25-06 12:14 AM   #32 
        - Why do you ask, Mr. Dithers? I'm sure you feel you have a point somewhere.  Nozebro   Nov-25-06 08:59 AM   #35 
  - Also, why weren't people evacuated earlier? n/t  Progs Rock   Nov-24-06 05:36 AM   #18 
  - Why did Rummie keep Command & Control in a building  DoYouEverWonder   Nov-24-06 08:53 AM   #20 
  - The show must go on. Who knew they were such good actors..  Joanne98   Nov-25-06 10:02 AM   #42 
  - It didn't want to hit the east wing. Where Rumsfield was sitting...  Joanne98   Nov-25-06 09:38 AM   #37 
     - One of Osama's friends at The Company probably told him where Rumsfeld  Nozebro   Nov-25-06 09:46 AM   #39 
        - I agree. The "softer" side of Osama exists. lol  Joanne98   Nov-25-06 09:54 AM   #41 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC