greyl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-15-06 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #35 |
| 37. The more accurate our measurement of speed, |
|
the less accurate our measurement of place. It's all in the quantum physics handbook, which has no bearing whatsoever in this case.
|
| -The Laws of Physics |
canetoad |
Sep-15-06 01:44 AM |
#0 |
 -
How did you determine that the collapse times were nearly the same? ( nt ) |
Make7 |
Sep-15-06 02:10 AM |
#1 |
  -
Wow, a whole 2 seconds difference between the two collapses |
DoYouEverWonder |
Sep-15-06 04:10 AM |
#12 |
| -
"times for the first exterior panels to strike the ground" nt |
greyl |
Sep-15-06 04:12 AM |
#13 |
| -
Here's the original question from the report |
DoYouEverWonder |
Sep-15-06 04:49 AM |
#15 |
| -
Look at the pics |
vincent_vega_lives |
Sep-15-06 10:51 AM |
#24 |
| -
Well you better let the folks at NIST know that they didn't |
DoYouEverWonder |
Sep-15-06 03:24 PM |
#41 |
| -
I don't disagree with that statment |
vincent_vega_lives |
Sep-15-06 03:37 PM |
#42 |
| -
You can run rings around yourself logically |
DoYouEverWonder |
Sep-15-06 03:40 PM |
#43 |
| -
Its pretty simple really |
vincent_vega_lives |
Sep-15-06 03:44 PM |
#44 |
| -
How |
tenseconds |
Sep-16-06 04:53 AM |
#45 |
| -
That small a difference? |
canetoad |
Sep-15-06 05:24 AM |
#16 |
| -
They're cool. |
greyl |
Sep-15-06 02:11 AM |
#2 |
| -
I said irrefutable chaps. Next............ |
canetoad |
Sep-15-06 02:35 AM |
#3 |
| -
Like Yosemite Sam wears? nt edit: |
greyl |
Sep-15-06 02:43 AM |
#4 |
| -
You ignored |
canetoad |
Sep-15-06 03:07 AM |
#6 |
| -
Bullshit. |
greyl |
Sep-15-06 03:30 AM |
#7 |
| -
Not for your education, for sure |
canetoad |
Sep-15-06 03:40 AM |
#8 |
| -
You can't be serious. I gave an answer. |
greyl |
Sep-15-06 03:45 AM |
#9 |
| -
Very fukken serious mate |
canetoad |
Sep-15-06 03:49 AM |
#10 |
| -
Please see post #1. nt |
greyl |
Sep-15-06 03:54 AM |
#11 |
| -
No play anymore. |
canetoad |
Sep-15-06 04:18 AM |
#14 |
| -
It's the common language of OCT'ers (Official Circle Talkers) |
Nozebro |
Sep-15-06 10:22 AM |
#22 |
| -
figures |
tenseconds |
Sep-17-06 09:48 PM |
#56 |
| -
Why must the conventional (correct) explanation be "irrefutable", but |
MervinFerd |
Sep-15-06 07:55 AM |
#19 |
| -
what makes the conventional correct? |
mirandapriestly |
Sep-17-06 02:12 AM |
#51 |
| -
Irrefutable Chaps |
cherokeeprogressive |
Sep-17-06 02:15 AM |
#53 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Sep-15-06 02:49 AM |
#5 |
| -
Don't hold your breath. It's not going to happen. OCT'ers won't do it. |
Nozebro |
Sep-15-06 10:25 AM |
#23 |
| -
no free fall |
tenseconds |
Sep-17-06 09:46 PM |
#55 |
| -
Why don't you ask some structural engineers? |
Anarcho-Socialist |
Sep-15-06 06:07 AM |
#17 |
| -
Talk to actual experts? People who actually know the field? WOW!!! |
MervinFerd |
Sep-15-06 07:52 AM |
#18 |
| -
tower hit second 'fell' first |
savemefromdumbya |
Sep-15-06 09:36 AM |
#20 |
| -
First tower to fall was hit at a higher speed, study finds. |
greyl |
Sep-15-06 09:45 AM |
#21 |
| -
"[W]as moving so fast that it was at risk of breaking up in midair" |
Ezlivin |
Sep-15-06 11:40 AM |
#25 |
| -
The plane wasn't flown beyond its limits, obviously. |
greyl |
Sep-15-06 11:50 AM |
#26 |
| -
No, you have that backwards. |
OldSiouxWarrior |
Sep-15-06 12:25 PM |
#27 |
| -
Plus, I think he's talking about Flight 77, not |
greyl |
Sep-15-06 12:34 PM |
#28 |
| -
I took it from his quote |
Ezlivin |
Sep-15-06 12:56 PM |
#31 |
| -
Ah, my quote? D'oh! nt |
greyl |
Sep-15-06 01:02 PM |
#33 |
| -
No. |
tenseconds |
Sep-16-06 04:58 AM |
#46 |
| -
You overlooked something |
Ezlivin |
Sep-15-06 12:55 PM |
#30 |
| -
They were somewhat skilled and chance explains the rest. |
greyl |
Sep-15-06 01:05 PM |
#34 |
| -
Hani Hanjour |
tenseconds |
Sep-17-06 09:54 PM |
#57 |
| -
See post # 32 |
OldSiouxWarrior |
Sep-15-06 01:36 PM |
#36 |
| -
The jets obviously hit the towers, hence it is equally obvious the |
Goldilocks |
Sep-16-06 08:46 PM |
#48 |
| -
jets |
tenseconds |
Sep-17-06 09:56 PM |
#58 |
| -
That article was not reporting on 767's or 757's. |
Make7 |
Sep-15-06 12:59 PM |
#32 |
| -
So they can estimate the planes' speeds, but they can't tell |
mhatrw |
Sep-15-06 01:31 PM |
#35 |
| -
The more accurate our measurement of speed, |
greyl |
Sep-15-06 01:36 PM |
#37 |
| -
LOL! ( n/t ) |
Make7 |
Sep-15-06 01:57 PM |
#38 |
| -
That is actually wrong |
savemefromdumbya |
Sep-15-06 02:49 PM |
#39 |
| -
Actually provide an argument. nt |
greyl |
Sep-15-06 02:52 PM |
#40 |
| -
because that's the way jesus wanted it |
leftofthedial |
Sep-15-06 12:54 PM |
#29 |
| -
That IS the prevailing mentality, isn't it? eom |
mirandapriestly |
Sep-17-06 02:14 AM |
#52 |
| -
irrefutable |
LARED |
Sep-16-06 05:14 AM |
#47 |
| -
I think something went wrong with the plan |
mirandapriestly |
Sep-17-06 02:07 AM |
#49 |
| -
Tell me why a few seconds makes a difference |
mirandapriestly |
Sep-17-06 02:10 AM |
#50 |
| -
They aren't very good at ANSWERING anything and when they do, you |
Nozebro |
Sep-17-06 10:04 PM |
#59 |
| -
RE: The Laws of Physics |
Make7 |
Sep-17-06 09:39 PM |
#54 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread