Reply #141: Explosives don't prove Bush complicity

[petgoat]

It's an important point.

Many CTers push CD because they think it does; others reject it
out of hand because they think it would.

I wasn't able to consider CD dispassionately until I took a hint
from Hugo Bachmann and imagined an "explosive tenant" in the WTC
that rented office space, moved explosives up the freight elevator
(some tenants used their offices as warehouse space), and installed
them in the elevator shafts late at night, using the tops of the
elevator cars as movable staging.

I found Professor Bachmann's thesis in Webster Tarpley (see p. 9)

http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:c4SKNriFRpIJ:www.reopen911.org/Tarpley_ch_6.pdf+explosive+tenant+swiss+tarpley&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1


Only by delinking the technical issue from inappropriate political
baggage could I think about it clearly.