You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #18: There are plenty of engineers who would disagree with... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
Rude Horner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. There are plenty of engineers who would disagree with...
your logic. Building designers and engineers who say that those buildings fell at free fall speed, like there was absolutely no resistance whatsoever. Who say that those towers were designed to withstand a direct hit from a plane and still stand, and certainly wouldn't collapse in such a short time from those collisions. Who point out that no steel structure building has ever collapsed due to fire.

And what about WTC 7? What about the owners comments that the decision was made "to pull it"?

There are plenty of good books on the subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC