wildbilln864
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #70 |
|
can you agree that common sense tells us that we need a complete and independant investigation?
If so, then I understand why.
If no, please explain why.
Thank you in advance.
|
| -Were the WTC towers demolished with explosives? |
Carefulplease |
Aug-08-06 11:01 PM |
#0 |
 -
JOTS! |
boloboffin |
Aug-08-06 11:10 PM |
#1 |
| -
I've just been scanning the article |
salvorhardin |
Aug-08-06 11:27 PM |
#2 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Aug-08-06 11:52 PM |
#3 |
 -
Yes, the article is full of idiotic nonsense |
dailykoff |
Aug-09-06 12:10 AM |
#5 |
| -
planting of explosives |
tabatha |
Aug-09-06 12:35 AM |
#6 |
| -
Two things... |
Carefulplease |
Aug-09-06 12:42 AM |
#7 |
| -
then pray tell please explain... |
wildbilln864 |
Aug-09-06 12:47 AM |
#9 |
 -
Gee, maybe because |
Jazz2006 |
Aug-09-06 01:06 AM |
#10 |
| -
Oh... |
wildbilln864 |
Aug-09-06 01:11 AM |
#12 |
| -
Not sure who you think you're fooling. |
Jazz2006 |
Aug-09-06 01:24 AM |
#14 |
| -
I don't know who you think ... |
wildbilln864 |
Aug-09-06 02:19 AM |
#23 |
| -
Controlled demo experts say that the buildings were not brought down by |
Jazz2006 |
Aug-09-06 02:55 AM |
#35 |
| -
What WTC6 has to do the subject matter |
petgoat |
Aug-09-06 01:49 PM |
#57 |
| -
Thank you petgoat 4... |
wildbilln864 |
Aug-09-06 02:13 PM |
#59 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Aug-09-06 02:49 PM |
#63 |
| -
None showing significant damage. |
petgoat |
Aug-09-06 02:58 PM |
#67 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Aug-09-06 10:08 PM |
#82 |
| -
You are wrong! |
Ka hrnt |
Aug-09-06 10:12 PM |
#83 |
| -
I might well be... |
Carefulplease |
Aug-09-06 10:25 PM |
#84 |
| -
Of course! |
Ka hrnt |
Aug-10-06 08:09 PM |
#102 |
| -
Your post is misleading. Here's just one of the pics again: |
greyl |
Aug-10-06 03:54 AM |
#97 |
| -
Why was this photo a secret for 5-1/2 years? |
petgoat |
Aug-10-06 06:33 PM |
#101 |
| -
Because *they* were saving it to post a 'gotcha' at DU years later, |
Jazz2006 |
Aug-10-06 09:07 PM |
#104 |
| -
Well, someone almost let the cat out of the bag back in June 2004. |
Make7 |
Aug-10-06 10:18 PM |
#106 |
| -
You're focussing on the least interesting question: When was it released? |
petgoat |
Aug-10-06 10:22 PM |
#107 |
| -
According to www.archive.org.. |
Make7 |
Aug-10-06 10:57 PM |
#108 |
| -
Why haven't so called "9/11 truth seekers" found it? |
greyl |
Aug-11-06 12:36 AM |
#109 |
| -
Ummm, excuse me |
petgoat |
Aug-11-06 01:55 AM |
#112 |
| -
How can it be "secret" if it's on a publicly available website? |
salvorhardin |
Aug-11-06 02:19 AM |
#114 |
| -
It wasn't a secret. The CTers just weren't looking. |
Jazz2006 |
Aug-11-06 02:52 AM |
#115 |
| -
What? You mean calling a receptionist isn't truth seeking? |
salvorhardin |
Aug-11-06 02:56 AM |
#116 |
| -
It was certainly secret to FEMA, who apparently found no plausible |
petgoat |
Aug-11-06 03:05 AM |
#117 |
| -
Here's a clue |
salvorhardin |
Aug-11-06 03:42 AM |
#119 |
| -
Unavailable to FEMA = secret. Your photos, no comment. nt |
petgoat |
Aug-11-06 03:57 AM |
#120 |
| -
That makes no sense. n/t |
salvorhardin |
Aug-11-06 10:19 AM |
#125 |
| -
a google search doesn't turn it up? |
Make7 |
Aug-11-06 04:05 AM |
#121 |
| -
dupe delete nt |
petgoat |
Aug-11-06 03:05 AM |
#118 |
| -
Yes, but don't tell the CTers... they still don't know it exists.... |
Jazz2006 |
Aug-11-06 12:42 AM |
#111 |
| -
Both towers ofthe WTC were designed to withstand the impact-- |
emcguffie |
Aug-10-06 05:59 PM |
#99 |
| -
They were indeed so designed howerver... |
Carefulplease |
Aug-10-06 10:01 PM |
#105 |
| -
One interesting item I just read as I go through this |
John Q. Citizen |
Aug-09-06 07:59 AM |
#50 |
| -
Good point. |
Carefulplease |
Aug-09-06 01:20 PM |
#56 |
| -
So it's your guess that the editor of Implosion World |
John Q. Citizen |
Aug-09-06 02:53 PM |
#65 |
| -
Yes this is a mistake. |
Carefulplease |
Aug-09-06 03:59 PM |
#73 |
| -
Do you really believe that? WTC7 was all of 14 years old, |
Jazz2006 |
Aug-09-06 01:11 AM |
#11 |
| -
Would explosives even remain viable all this time? |
salvorhardin |
Aug-09-06 01:57 AM |
#18 |
| -
Doubtful. |
Jazz2006 |
Aug-09-06 02:09 AM |
#20 |
| -
I agree |
salvorhardin |
Aug-09-06 02:17 AM |
#22 |
| -
Agreed. |
Jazz2006 |
Aug-09-06 02:20 AM |
#24 |
| -
... or have been performed completely undetected, in advance... |
Make7 |
Aug-09-06 01:29 AM |
#15 |
| -
Tsk tsk. More selective quote mining by the CT brigade. |
Jazz2006 |
Aug-09-06 01:32 AM |
#16 |
| -
All quotations are selective. (n/t) |
dailykoff |
Aug-09-06 01:10 PM |
#54 |
| -
That's a fact. A glaringly obvious fact in fact. n/t |
John Q. Citizen |
Aug-09-06 03:01 PM |
#68 |
| -
. |
Make7 |
Aug-09-06 03:25 PM |
#72 |
| -
Post 16 is technically redundant, while yours is ignorant. Quote Mining: |
greyl |
Aug-09-06 04:01 PM |
#74 |
| -
I see you've never written a research paper. |
dailykoff |
Aug-09-06 04:52 PM |
#76 |
| -
. |
Make7 |
Aug-09-06 05:36 PM |
#77 |
| -
You haven't a clue, really, do you? |
Jazz2006 |
Aug-10-06 03:24 AM |
#93 |
| -
Dr. Van Romero said it looked just like controlled demolition. |
petgoat |
Aug-09-06 09:26 PM |
#80 |
| -
You're right, it was technically redundant since it |
Jazz2006 |
Aug-10-06 01:42 AM |
#90 |
| -
And, in turn, you are correct. :) nt |
greyl |
Aug-10-06 03:07 AM |
#92 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Aug-11-06 12:41 AM |
#110 |
| -
. |
Make7 |
Aug-11-06 10:56 AM |
#126 |
| -
The contention in the the "Implosion World" article that "several |
John Q. Citizen |
Aug-09-06 09:54 AM |
#51 |
| -
Yes, obviously. |
dailykoff |
Aug-09-06 12:04 AM |
#4 |
| -
Thank you! |
wildbilln864 |
Aug-09-06 12:42 AM |
#8 |
| -
It's good to see demolition experts speaking up |
Jazz2006 |
Aug-09-06 01:17 AM |
#13 |
| -
You don't know what you're talking about. |
petgoat |
Aug-09-06 01:36 AM |
#17 |
| -
More mistruths from 9-11 Truthers |
salvorhardin |
Aug-09-06 02:04 AM |
#19 |
| -
Dr. Van Romero never retracted the statement that the collapse looked |
petgoat |
Aug-09-06 02:26 AM |
#25 |
| -
You're selectively quoting Van Romero in order to mislead people about |
boloboffin |
Aug-09-06 02:28 AM |
#26 |
| -
I am not misleading anyone. Dr. Romero said the collapse looked |
petgoat |
Aug-09-06 02:31 AM |
#29 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Aug-09-06 02:33 AM |
#31 |
| -
What exactly is my alleged problem? nt |
petgoat |
Aug-09-06 03:12 AM |
#38 |
| -
You have to ask? |
Jazz2006 |
Aug-09-06 04:18 AM |
#45 |
| -
I'm asking for specifics. |
petgoat |
Aug-09-06 04:23 AM |
#47 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Aug-09-06 04:45 AM |
#49 |
| -
Fortunately, |
Jazz2006 |
Aug-10-06 03:27 AM |
#94 |
| -
I don't often have to point out to the court the obvious about CTers |
petgoat |
Aug-10-06 12:34 PM |
#98 |
| -
LOL!! n/t |
Hope2006 |
Aug-10-06 06:27 PM |
#100 |
| -
*you* might try on an argument like that |
Jazz2006 |
Aug-10-06 08:41 PM |
#103 |
| -
Don't you love this? |
Ka hrnt |
Aug-09-06 07:11 PM |
#78 |
| -
Why does that boggle the mind? |
petgoat |
Aug-09-06 09:01 PM |
#79 |
| -
That's rational? Yikes. |
Ka hrnt |
Aug-09-06 09:34 PM |
#81 |
| -
You are mischaracterizing the statements. |
petgoat |
Aug-09-06 10:45 PM |
#85 |
| -
I agree with you... |
Carefulplease |
Aug-09-06 11:39 PM |
#86 |
| -
More mistruths from 9-11 Truthers |
salvorhardin |
Aug-09-06 02:41 AM |
#34 |
| -
Dr. Romero did not retract his statement that the collapse looked like CD. |
petgoat |
Aug-09-06 03:04 AM |
#36 |
| -
Your analogy skills are still at kindergarten level, goat. |
Jazz2006 |
Aug-09-06 04:15 AM |
#44 |
| -
Van Romero's initial statement |
mirandapriestly |
Aug-09-06 03:24 AM |
#40 |
| -
No, it's you who doesn't know what you're talking about. |
Jazz2006 |
Aug-09-06 02:10 AM |
#21 |
| -
Dr. Romero agrees with himself: it looked like controlled demolition. |
petgoat |
Aug-09-06 02:28 AM |
#27 |
| -
I'm a "freeper"? |
Jazz2006 |
Aug-09-06 02:29 AM |
#28 |
| -
Stop spamming about yourself. Go to DU Lounge. nt |
petgoat |
Aug-09-06 02:32 AM |
#30 |
| -
You're the one throwing the freeper label around, goat, to anyone |
Jazz2006 |
Aug-09-06 02:34 AM |
#32 |
| -
if it walks like a duck... |
BrokenBeyondRepair |
Aug-09-06 01:11 PM |
#55 |
| -
You may be right.... the goat does walk like a duck.... |
Jazz2006 |
Aug-11-06 04:45 AM |
#124 |
| -
CTers have cited the implosionworld website repeatedly as |
Jazz2006 |
Aug-09-06 02:38 AM |
#33 |
| -
You can make this stuff up. I never heard of implosionworld |
petgoat |
Aug-09-06 03:06 AM |
#37 |
| -
I did a DU search and it only shows up |
mirandapriestly |
Aug-09-06 03:16 AM |
#39 |
| -
You have search capability - go look it up.... |
Jazz2006 |
Aug-09-06 04:13 AM |
#43 |
| -
I think thermite is used by the military more than demolition |
mirandapriestly |
Aug-09-06 03:41 AM |
#41 |
| -
Good point with the tags |
KJF |
Aug-09-06 04:19 AM |
#46 |
| -
A point or two |
KJF |
Aug-09-06 03:41 AM |
#42 |
| -
Thanks for your patient reading, Kevn. |
petgoat |
Aug-09-06 04:28 AM |
#48 |
| -
I know. He says he wasn't paid by anyone, , but I |
mirandapriestly |
Aug-10-06 12:50 AM |
#87 |
| -
A point or two. |
Carefulplease |
Aug-09-06 02:24 PM |
#60 |
| -
I'm going to try to stick very closely to the topic... |
KJF |
Aug-10-06 01:53 AM |
#91 |
| -
Also, on the 91st floor of the north tower, which was |
mirandapriestly |
Aug-10-06 01:03 AM |
#88 |
| -
Your post is factually incorrect. Was that intentional? |
Artdyst |
Aug-09-06 11:17 AM |
#52 |
| -
Is it really? |
Carefulplease |
Aug-09-06 12:58 PM |
#53 |
| -
Just because the corporate media misleads doesn't mean you should |
Artdyst |
Aug-09-06 02:08 PM |
#58 |
| -
The corporate media misleads... |
Carefulplease |
Aug-09-06 02:44 PM |
#62 |
| -
A few more examples: |
Make7 |
Aug-09-06 02:50 PM |
#64 |
| -
Self delete... (moved up) |
Carefulplease |
Aug-09-06 02:41 PM |
#61 |
| -
Your post is factually incorrect. Was that intentional? |
Make7 |
Aug-09-06 02:53 PM |
#66 |
| -
No, I mean ALL experts in common sense. Every single one. EOM |
Artdyst |
Aug-09-06 03:03 PM |
#69 |
| -
Have you seen, read, or heard the opinions of ALL of those experts? |
Make7 |
Aug-09-06 03:14 PM |
#70 |
| -
Make7... |
wildbilln864 |
Aug-09-06 03:20 PM |
#71 |
| -
Red herring. Please respect the specific topic at hand. nt |
greyl |
Aug-09-06 04:06 PM |
#75 |
| -
For one thing you're not the moderator, and for another... |
mirandapriestly |
Aug-10-06 01:13 AM |
#89 |
| -
The topic at hand is the lack of necessity for specifying "some" |
greyl |
Aug-10-06 03:29 AM |
#95 |
| -
You mean ad hominem like this? |
mirandapriestly |
Aug-11-06 04:12 AM |
#123 |
| -
No, different. |
greyl |
Aug-11-06 11:07 AM |
#127 |
| -
But do you know what ad hominem means? |
salvorhardin |
Aug-11-06 11:15 AM |
#128 |
| -
No. It's only an ad hominem attack if someone disses one of THEM. nt |
Artdyst |
Aug-11-06 12:40 PM |
#133 |
| -
Oh my |
Jazz2006 |
Aug-10-06 03:35 AM |
#96 |
| -
I wish someone would devote a thread to this post. |
HuskerDU |
Aug-11-06 02:10 AM |
#113 |
| -
None of the OCT will answer it or they say they don't want one |
mirandapriestly |
Aug-11-06 04:06 AM |
#122 |
| -
Your post is shockingly dishonest and intended to mislead. |
greyl |
Aug-11-06 11:19 AM |
#129 |
| -
Here is one right here. Please apologize. |
mirandapriestly |
Aug-11-06 12:24 PM |
#130 |
| -
Answers? Maybe that's someone else's job. Don't ask me which one. EOM |
Artdyst |
Aug-11-06 12:35 PM |
#131 |
| -
I remember that single example too, which is why |
greyl |
Aug-11-06 12:38 PM |
#132 |
| -
Which debate handbook do you use? (title and author, please) Thanks. |
Artdyst |
Aug-11-06 12:41 PM |
#134 |
| -
Why, do you need one? nt |
greyl |
Aug-11-06 12:46 PM |
#135 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread