Reply #72: If they're not claiming he said it was CD, and they're only

[petgoat]

claiming he said it looked like CD, then it's up to the reader to make the distinction
you're refusing to make. Frankly I'd never heard of the guy and his supposed expert
status makes no difference to me. Van Romero said it looked just like CD too.

Sound carries over water, amazingly. There have been reports of people hearing conversations
across a lake. Your invocation of 6 million non-witnesses in an attempt to refute the
testimony of twenty-thirty witnesses to explosions is not logical.

I'm not an acoustics expert. I don't know how the acoustical environment around Ground Zero
might have masked the sounds. Perhaps the sound-reflective properies of surrounding buildings
created an environment where low-frequency waves were scattered and cancelled out. it could
even be that the charges were designed to be relatively quiet.

I don't know. Maybe Rick Siegel is a liar and his audio is completely phony. But since it's
corroborated by earwitness testimony from the site, I'm inclined to accept it provisionally.
I believe news reporters spoke of secondary explosions and secondary devices on the day of
the event, but never spoke of them after.