Reply #73: yawn

[medienanalyse]

Petgoat,

Do you really not realise how weak your standpoint is ? How construed your arguments are ?

Sample 1:
“Your approach is pure phantasy.
Radio control is no fantasy.”
Is this the way you argue ?”

That was my question and I illustrated it with the TITANIC-bullshit. And your answer is AGAIN.
“The assertion that radio control is impossible is absurd on its face.”

So I will tell you again, for the slow reader:
1. bombs exist in this world.
2. radio control is a fact in this world.
3. Bullshit is a weak and stinking material in this world.
BUT: bombs are not responsible for every destruction, radioing does not necessarily incite every bomb, and bullshit might sink ships, but very rarely.

GET INTO YOUR HEAD: you argue with possibilities and not with facts. I do not deny the possibility of a controlled demolition, of explosives on lift cars and of radio ignition. Not. I do NOT doubt possibilities. You must not tell me what MIGHT have happened. PROVE it and do not bore people by endless reiterations and pics and Silverstone “pull-down” quotes.


Sample 2:
“Many of the floors were vacant. The morning shift workers do not commonly inspect the elevator shafts or the space above the suspended ceiling.”

Yes, the vacant floors were used weekly for aorgies with naked women and shaved sheep. Loads of honey and strawberries were spread over the flesh and in some rooms they used even machines to do their black Sabbath. All transported in the night on top of the lift cars. Aaaahaaaam, except in 9/10: they changed the programme to make boom boom. Cavemen from Tora Bora came in and broght 1 ton of TNT or butter (which melts !!!).



Samplle 3:
I asked “How could he ever KNOW about the impact of a plane when sitting in the basement.”
Your queer answer was:
”… he said … that he heard the plane strike.”

I know what he SAID. I know about the noise. We know about the shudder.

But HE COULD NOT KNOW if it was a plane or a bomb AT THAT TIME. And this is important because he was so eager to tell the public in the last month that he could distinguish clearly generator boom from Bomb from plane crash from gas eclosion from falling platforms from falling lift cars from igniting kerosin.

Rodriguez Superstar SAYS a lot. Like you.

Sample 4:
“Don't have a lab, don't have a sample, and lack experience in exposives analysis.”

So obviously the New York “physical evidence” community is unable to obtain some grams from those hundredthousands which were spread over New York ? Unable to get access to a mass spectrometer ? Not even this famous “Dr. Jones?”
You would IMMEDIATELY be able to prove your case. You could send sample to tha Malaysians and any other laboratory of the world.


Petgoat: I end the discussion here. It makes no sense to discuss with a child who wants an ice cream to tell there is no ice cream available.
You want ice cream, you want, you want, you want.
“apparently <…not…>a claim plausible to the Great Silent Majority of structural engineers who never disputed it”
The cild is loud, and others are silent. Yes.

Get adult.