shira
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-08-11 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #37 |
| 38. That's about all they have when they're trying to avoid answering simple questions. n/t |
| -Scary US views |
shira |
Dec-07-11 12:37 PM |
#0 |
-
Israel frequently causes their own problems, mostly with their unwillingness to cooperate. |
chrisa |
Dec-07-11 12:39 PM |
#1 |
-
Not sure what's "Scary" about the opinions stated in |
RT Atlanta |
Dec-07-11 12:43 PM |
#2 |
 -
Read on in the article for what's scary... |
shira |
Dec-07-11 01:13 PM |
#6 |
-
I'd say 'frightening' is in the eye of the beholder... |
HereSince1628 |
Dec-07-11 12:44 PM |
#3 |
-
I don't see where it says they should just start making concessions |
AmericaIsGreat |
Dec-07-11 12:52 PM |
#4 |
-
Both Panetta and Gutman were given their posts by Barack Obama |
azurnoir |
Dec-07-11 12:53 PM |
#5 |
 -
Can't say I know WTF is going on, but this is easy pickings for Repukes like Romney and Gingrich. |
shira |
Dec-07-11 01:16 PM |
#7 |
  -
Really easy pickings? you think Republcans will win on Israel alone? |
azurnoir |
Dec-07-11 01:38 PM |
#8 |
 -
These 3 remarks WRT Israel in the past few days look really amateurish. The Repukes don't need... |
shira |
Dec-07-11 01:54 PM |
#10 |
 -
I'm sure they don't at least where some are concerned but for most Democrats |
azurnoir |
Dec-07-11 02:07 PM |
#13 |
 -
Gutman apologized 100% |
King_David |
Dec-07-11 03:17 PM |
#17 |
-
you mean whether or not his apology is accepted? n/t |
azurnoir |
Dec-07-11 09:41 PM |
#31 |
-
Nah you missed the point |
King_David |
Dec-07-11 11:35 PM |
#32 |
-
Did he say he was wrong or that he was 'taken' wrong? |
azurnoir |
Dec-08-11 12:45 AM |
#34 |
-
The irony is rich: |
Jefferson23 |
Dec-07-11 01:50 PM |
#9 |
 -
Israel could go back to the strict 1949 armistice lines and it wouldn't matter one bit to the MB... |
shira |
Dec-07-11 01:58 PM |
#11 |
-
According to the shill/apologist who wrote the OP you posted, yea. |
Jefferson23 |
Dec-07-11 02:06 PM |
#12 |
-
Oh yeah? Show me where the MB, its affiliates, or supporters endorse 2 states. NT |
shira |
Dec-07-11 02:15 PM |
#14 |
-
The Muslm Brotherhood is preventing Bibi from a two state solution.. |
Jefferson23 |
Dec-07-11 02:23 PM |
#15 |
-
WTF? No. Have you ever once seen the MB stating they'd agree to a peaceful 2 state solution? |
shira |
Dec-07-11 02:34 PM |
#16 |
-
The Muslim Brotherhood is preventing Bibi? Otherwise your question |
Jefferson23 |
Dec-07-11 05:12 PM |
#19 |
-
This isn't about Bibi. What makes you think a Meretz run government could make Hamas and friends... |
shira |
Dec-07-11 05:16 PM |
#21 |
-
This has everything to do with Bibi and his Likud buddies. |
Jefferson23 |
Dec-07-11 05:24 PM |
#22 |
-
Nice try. Not even Meretz could work out a peace deal with Hamas, Iran, or the MB. |
shira |
Dec-07-11 07:13 PM |
#23 |
-
No, that is your opinion, offer the as you well know nonsense to someone else. |
Jefferson23 |
Dec-07-11 07:18 PM |
#24 |
-
Can you provide evidence demonstrating that either Hamas, the MB, or Iran will recognize Israel.. |
shira |
Dec-07-11 07:23 PM |
#25 |
-
Ridiculous questions, ask the guy you called a clown on all things I/P. |
Jefferson23 |
Dec-07-11 07:27 PM |
#26 |
-
That means 'No'. So you have zero evidence of Hamas, Iran, and the MB wanting to make peace... |
shira |
Dec-07-11 07:30 PM |
#27 |
-
You answer my questions for me, why bother to ask me at all shira. |
Jefferson23 |
Dec-07-11 07:37 PM |
#28 |
-
You had your shot. You've got nothing. Thanks for playing. n/t |
shira |
Dec-07-11 07:38 PM |
#29 |
-
Oh come on, write Panetta, the Secretary of Defense..ask him |
Jefferson23 |
Dec-07-11 07:41 PM |
#30 |
-
But I'm asking you. Why don't you just admit you can't defend what you're arguing in favor of? NT |
shira |
Dec-08-11 04:39 PM |
#46 |
-
Panetta engaged in the classic of blaming the victim |
vminfla |
Dec-07-11 03:50 PM |
#18 |
-
lol, ok. More support for the shill/apologist that authored the OP. n/t |
Jefferson23 |
Dec-07-11 05:14 PM |
#20 |
-
actually you avoid direct questions.... |
pelsar |
Dec-08-11 12:22 AM |
#33 |
 -
ah Pelsar you should check the comment your referring to |
azurnoir |
Dec-08-11 01:23 AM |
#35 |
 -
You're confused pelsar. I am not the poster you are referring to. |
Jefferson23 |
Dec-08-11 05:44 AM |
#36 |
-
oops..sorry... |
pelsar |
Dec-08-11 10:29 PM |
#49 |
 -
No problem pelsar..hope springs eternal for us both. |
Jefferson23 |
Dec-09-11 12:30 PM |
#50 |
-
You still avoided the question |
vminfla |
Dec-10-11 11:57 AM |
#51 |
-
This logical fallacy is called "attacking the messenger" |
vminfla |
Dec-08-11 08:18 AM |
#37 |
-
That's about all they have when they're trying to avoid answering simple questions. n/t |
shira |
Dec-08-11 08:27 AM |
#38 |
 -
Don't forget recycling past memes |
vminfla |
Dec-08-11 09:09 AM |
#39 |
-
The content is bullshit and the author is a shill...no need to separate the two. |
Jefferson23 |
Dec-08-11 01:37 PM |
#40 |
-
Would it be out of line to tell the USA to get to the damn table with al-Qaeda? n/t |
shira |
Dec-08-11 02:47 PM |
#41 |
 -
The Palestinians and a terrorist group all the same to you. |
Jefferson23 |
Dec-08-11 03:02 PM |
#42 |
-
Hamas is a terror group that the PA is trying to form a coalition gov't with.... |
shira |
Dec-08-11 04:36 PM |
#45 |
-
I think most people reading your posts can figure out what is, as you say, "pretty obvious". n/t |
Jefferson23 |
Dec-08-11 05:15 PM |
#47 |
-
Yep, using empirical evidence & logic is obviously a zionist trick.... |
shira |
Dec-08-11 05:24 PM |
#48 |
-
This logical fallacy is called a Argumentum ad Nauseum |
vminfla |
Dec-08-11 03:06 PM |
#43 |
-
lol, sure thing champ. n/t |
Jefferson23 |
Dec-08-11 03:07 PM |
#44 |