Reply #195: It doesn't matter what Chomsky says about Israel Shahak - it is well known Shahak is antisemitic

[shira]

It is not simply antizionist to claim that the Talmud is a work of hate, that Jews pray to the devil, that Jewish children are taught to curse the dead at gentile cemetaries, that it's okay to make up a story about a Rabbi who on the Sabbath did nothing to save the life of a non-Jew.

No matter who apologizes for Shahak, THAT is antisemitic filth - the likes of which can be found at any ZOG hating master race website.

Do you seriously not get it?

That Chomsky celebrates Shahak speaks volumes in itself but that's another story.

--------

As for Atzmon, are you aware of what Tony Greenstein has written about him WRT his blatant outright antisemitism? Greenstein is in no way pro-zionist.

Here's Atzmon relating the killing of Palestinians to the way Jews killed Jesus:

In the film (Mel Gibson's “The Passion of Christ”) Pilate, the Roman governor of Palestine, says, 'Behold the man,” displaying the broken and bleeding Jesus to the crowd. But the high priest insists, “Crucify him.” Pilate responds, “Isn't this enough?” The mob roars, “No,” and only then does the Roman leader agree to the Crucifixion. In today's reality the world, like Pilate says, “Behold the man,” displaying the broken and bleeding Palestinians asking “isn't it enough?” But the Israeli mob roars “No” to requests for mercy. If anything, they want more persecution and misery. Evidently, the popularity of the high priest Sharon rises sharply after each killing of Palestinians. Like their biblical ancestors, the image of blood fills the Zionist with cheer.

Pure medieval shithouse libel that led to pogroms and the holocaust.

That goes WAY beyond antizionism.