You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #18: Ben-Gurion should have placed saving Jews from Hitler first, before the fixation with establishing [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Ben-Gurion should have placed saving Jews from Hitler first, before the fixation with establishing
Edited on Tue Jun-02-09 03:29 AM by Ken Burch
A "Jewish state".

(BTW, since Hitler would simply have carpet bombed such a state if it had existed during World War II, and since we can assume that no one at all would have stopped him from doing so, such a state could never have protected Jews from Nazism.)

And working to get Jewish refugees to safety in the U.S. and Canada(where they could easily have been absorbed)would not have either harmed the Zionist cause nor interfered with the ability of those Jewish people who wished to settle in what became Israel if they wished to do so. And after the war, a lot of Jewish refugees were essentially forced to become Israelis, whether they had actually wanted to be or not. Having narrowly survived one war, they were forced to take up arms in another, whether or not they had even supported Zionism or not.

And the U.S. should and could have been pressed to relent and take those refugees in. It was not impossible to have changed the U.S. position. Ben-Gurion, however, was far more interested in forcing the European Jewish community to be partisans of the Zionist cause, whether they wished to be or not. There were good people within the Diaspora who backed Zionism and equally good people who
opposed it.

And the fact that the Israeli government has chosen to put recent immigrants into those settlements does not mean that was the only place in Israel they could have been sent to live. There was and is plenty of room in Israel proper.

The settlements serve no truly positive or necessary purpose. They are there for one reason: to make it impossible for Palestinians to form a viable state. And continuing to expand those settlements in the Nineties sabotaged the peace process, making it impossible for Palestinians to trust the Israeli government or to have any confidence that they'd actually get self-determination. And as the events of the post-1967 era have shown, Palestinians have no hope of a decent life unless they get a state.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC