You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #64: More on the report, from Richard Silverstein [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
64. More on the report, from Richard Silverstein
Obama’s Tough Love to Bibi

Apr 16th, 2009 by Richard Silverstein | 7
H/t to M.J. Rosenberg for noting one of the most amazing newspaper reports coming out of Israel in months, if not several years. Yediot Achronot reports (quotations are taken from a translation not available online and supplied by Benor Consulting) that Rahm Emanuel astonishingly promised a major American Jewish leader that Barack Obama will see the creation of a Palestinian state before the end of his first term:

(snip)

The Obama administration has been sending clear messages lately that President Obama has no intention of waiting two years until Netanyahu crystallizes a vision on the future negotiations with the Palestinians. Senior American officials said that former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and former Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni already established an outline solution that has been accepted by the international community.

I have been waiting 40 years to see a president do what needs to be done regarding Israeli intransigence and unwillingness to negotiate an end to the conflict. While an unsourced report in an Israeli newspaper is not the most credible source, if even half of this Yediot report is true Obama will be the president of my dreams, at least regarding Israeli-Palestinian peace.

Also interesting is a U.S. linkage between resolving the Iranian nuclear issue and removing Israeli settlers and settlements from the West Bank:

Senior US administration officials are fully aware of the linkage that Prime Minister Netanyahu and Defense Minister Barak have created between Israeli willingness to make advances on the Palestinian track and their expectations of the Americans to address the Iranian threat, and senior American officials have begun to talk about “Bushehr for Yitzhar.” Namely, if you want us to help you defuse the Iranian threat, including the nuclear reactor in Bushehr, get ready to evacuate settlements in the West Bank, with Yitzhar considered to be a token of an Israeli withdrawal from West Bank territory.

While I’m in favor of using any leverage available to bring Israel to negotiate an end to this conflict, I’m not so sure that tying two such disparate issues as Iran’s nuclear capability and Israeli settlements together is wise. What if the U.S. fails to secure Iranian agreement to end its nuclear program? What if whatever agreement the U.S. does reach with Iran doesn’t satisfy Israel? There are too many ways to weasel out of this one I’m afraid. This reeks of a Bibi-Barack devised trick.

(snip)

I note also that the Israelis haven’t even secured any date to meet Obama. In other words, the president is leaving him high and dry. To not have a new prime minister attend the national Aipac conference will be a huge blow not just to Bibi, but to Aipac as well. The group prides itself as being the major power broker and liaison between American Jewry, and Israel’s and America’s political leadership. Obama is deliberately depriving them of their traditional role. There must be much gnashing of teeth in Aipac’s offices today.

When Rahm Emanuel was first appointed chief of staff many worried that he would be a pro-Israel Likudist pushover. If Shimon Shiffer’s story is any indication, this fear turns out to have been completely unfounded. I can’t tell you how pleased I am to know that my president and his chief of staff are willing to kick ass to get things done. Higiya zman (”it’s about time”)!

UPDATE: I just had a conversation with Sol Salbe about this Yediot story and he and I both agree that there is a shifting of tectonic plates both in this country’s relationship with Israel and the power of the Israel lobby. Sol is more declarative than I’m willing to be and believes that in the history of Israel the years 1948 and 1967 were landmarks. The events of those years were epoch-changing and what came afterward was nothing like what came before. And he thinks that 2009, or at least the four years of Obama’s first term will be equally historic.

(snip)

If Obama succeeds as Emanuel promises he will and there is a new Palestinian state, then there is no doubt that there will also be peace between Israel and Syria, that Lebanon will eventually normalize relations, that Hezbollah will cease being Israel’s mortal enemy, and Iran will stand down from its threatening rhetoric and actions toward Israel. And this WOULD BE the birth pangs of a new Middle East.


http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/2009/04/16/obamas-tough-love-to-bibi/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC