You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

The Zionists are playing a dangerous game by scuttling Freeman’s appointment [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 07:29 AM
Original message
The Zionists are playing a dangerous game by scuttling Freeman’s appointment
Advertisements [?]

By Eric Walberg
Online Journal Contributing Writer

Mar 23, 2009, 00:21

Email this article
Printer friendly page

The remarkable hegemony of Zionists in the US and, by implication, world politics continues unabated, as demonstrated starkly by the withdrawal of Chas Freeman as United States President Barack Obama’s nominee to chair his National Intelligence Council (NIC).


Jews have more of a tradition of being liberals and supporting Democrats. But nowadays, more important than shades of pink are the Zionist colours one flaunts, and no US politician, left or right, dares to buck the Zionist tide. Whether or not Freeman -- or any other US public figure -- is Jewish is now a moot point. So it is not really so important to point out that Obama’s closest advisers are Jewish, such as his chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, his vice president’s chief of staff, Ron Klain, senior advisor David Axelrod, and his domestic cabinet members Timothy Geithner, Lawrence Summers, Paul Volker, Peter Orszag, Jason Furman and Jamie Rubin. It is more to the point to emphasise that they are Zionists one and all, including his Catholic vice president, Joseph Biden (“You don’t have to be Jewish to be a Zionist”), and Protestant Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.


Zionists are the essential second leg that Obama stands on, along with his imperial support. As Democratic Caucus chairman, Emanuel helped make sure that 60 percent of Democratic congressmen and virtually all the senators will continue to support the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan, with the possibility of an attack on Iran still on the table, despite that fact that 60 percent of Americans (80 percent of Demcrats) are against such policies. Emanuel served in the IDF during the 1990 Gulf war, which would have resulted in his arrest and the end of his political career if he had been involved in any other country’s war as a soldier. His father was a member of the terrorist organisation Irgun and no doubt murdered dozens of Palestinians fighting to protect their homeland. “Rahm-bo” also knocked on doors for AIPAC as a student in the 1980s in AIPAC’s successful effort to unseat former Republican Congressman Paul Findley just because he was for balance in US Middle East policy.


Jewish chutzpah celebrates the November 2008 US elections, where more Jews were elected than ever -- 10 percent of congressmen, four times their proportion in the population. This leaves aside the fact that more than 90 percent of congressmen and senators vote for all motions concerning Israel which are approved, if not formulated, by AIPAC.

The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, inspired by the Zionists and their stranglehold on politics and media, have led to mounting frustration, allowing occasional, if carefully modulated criticism to trickle down into the mainstream media. Time columnist Joe Klein, who supported Bush’s war against Iraq and considers himself “a strong supporter of Israel,” wrote (in a lowly blog) that the “fact that a great many Jewish neoconservatives -- people like Joe Lieberman and the crowd at Commentary -- plumped for this war , and now for an even more foolish assault on Iran, raised the question of divided loyalties.” Within a day, Abraham Foxman, head of the Anti-Defamation League, accused Klein of espousing “age-old anti-Semitic canards about a Jewish conspiracy to control and manipulate government.”


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -The Zionists are playing a dangerous game by scuttling Freeman’s appointment cali  Mar-24-09 07:29 AM   #0 
  - This is an example of anti-zionism that is indeed rooted in  cali   Mar-24-09 07:31 AM   #1 
  - So why in the hell did you post it? What kind of game are you playing?  ProgressiveMuslim   Mar-24-09 11:09 AM   #6 
  - I posted it as an example of  cali   Mar-24-09 11:19 AM   #7 
     - Do you really think we need examples of hate posted here?  ProgressiveMuslim   Mar-24-09 01:52 PM   #9 
        - Cali blew it  shira   Mar-24-09 05:31 PM   #10 
           - Oh poop! The trap was ruined. It would have been so much fun!  ProgressiveMuslim   Mar-24-09 05:41 PM   #11 
              - there was no trap, nor did I have any intention of setting one.  cali   Mar-24-09 06:30 PM   #15 
              - The poster PM was replying to made out that it was, which was pretty silly...  Violet_Crumble   Mar-25-09 05:02 AM   #20 
              - btw, what do you find wrong about the OP?  shira   Mar-24-09 08:57 PM   #16 
                 - this question applies to anyone willing to answer (besides the pro-Israel posters here).  shira   Mar-24-09 09:00 PM   #17 
                 - Oh goody! Shira, is there a new-fangled "anti-semitism" meter you're going to employ  ProgressiveMuslim   Mar-25-09 05:54 AM   #23 
                    - just asking what you or others find objectionable in the OP, since the consensus seems  shira   Mar-25-09 06:01 AM   #26 
                       - Hey Shira -- did you hear about the panel at the 92nd Street Y yesterday?  ProgressiveMuslim   Mar-25-09 06:15 AM   #29 
                          - can you answer my question first? then I'll answer you, okay?  shira   Mar-25-09 06:21 AM   #32 
                          - Actually I could care less what you think! Your POV is becoming extinct. nt  ProgressiveMuslim   Mar-25-09 06:35 AM   #39 
                             - maybe you're right.......antisemitic acts are spiking big time worldwide, not a good sign  shira   Mar-25-09 06:12 PM   #56 
                          - You know, I had a disagreement with BTA about this very topic.  Idealism   Mar-25-09 10:08 PM   #65 
                             - Consider yourself in good company in being wrong.  Behind the Aegis   Mar-25-09 11:49 PM   #67 
                                - That is your opinion and I have mine, but who is to say which is universally right?  Idealism   Mar-25-09 11:58 PM   #68 
                                - I have an opinion and you have an opinion, who is to say one isn't wrong, universally or otherwise?  Behind the Aegis   Mar-26-09 12:08 AM   #69 
                                   - Well we both can't be right, but I doubt that matters n/t  Idealism   Mar-26-09 12:09 AM   #70 
                                - So you disagree with Abe Foxman on this one?  ProgressiveMuslim   Mar-26-09 06:01 AM   #71 
  - That article's a load of crap....  Violet_Crumble   Mar-25-09 04:56 AM   #19 
  - Umph.  LeftishBrit   Mar-24-09 07:53 AM   #2 
  - Fortunately, the world is far more complex than this.  leveymg   Mar-24-09 08:13 AM   #3 
  - Unfortunately this is the message being spread across much of the Arab world  oberliner   Mar-24-09 10:21 AM   #4 
     - Cali didn't link Al Ahram. It was some online journal (I've never heard of).  ProgressiveMuslim   Mar-24-09 05:48 PM   #12 
        - Al-Ahram is not a hate site though, is it?  oberliner   Mar-24-09 06:14 PM   #13 
           - I certainly don't think it's a hate site.  ProgressiveMuslim   Mar-24-09 06:17 PM   #14 
           - See for yourself. What do ya think?  Sezu   Mar-24-09 10:23 PM   #18 
           - nah, not antisemitic  shira   Mar-25-09 05:18 AM   #22 
           - Of course it's not n/t  Violet_Crumble   Mar-25-09 05:04 AM   #21 
              - VC, c'mon. Aren't all Arabs really anti-semites? Al Ahram is Egyptian. Egypt is Arab. Ergo....  ProgressiveMuslim   Mar-25-09 05:56 AM   #24 
                 - It's incredibly ridiculous....  Violet_Crumble   Mar-25-09 06:05 AM   #27 
                    - As if Oberliner is not well aware of Al-Ahram!  ProgressiveMuslim   Mar-25-09 06:10 AM   #28 
                    - I know he is, which is why I figured the question was coz of the two diffferent places it appeared..  Violet_Crumble   Mar-25-09 06:19 AM   #30 
                       - In any case, I thought forum rules prohibited the posting of pieces which would be termed "hate."  ProgressiveMuslim   Mar-25-09 06:20 AM   #31 
                          - why is the OP hate?  shira   Mar-25-09 06:23 AM   #33 
                          - Cali said so in post #2.  ProgressiveMuslim   Mar-25-09 06:31 AM   #36 
                             - it's hate because Cali said so?  shira   Mar-25-09 03:56 PM   #51 
                          - Yeah, wondered the same thing myself...  Violet_Crumble   Mar-25-09 06:23 AM   #34 
                             - With that, I am going to do my part to let this thread die its natural death. nt  ProgressiveMuslim   Mar-25-09 06:34 AM   #38 
                                - Don't blame you. I was halfway tempted not to post in it at all after reading a few posts...  Violet_Crumble   Mar-25-09 06:39 AM   #40 
                    - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-25-09 02:11 PM   #49 
  - Walberg seems at best...  LeftishBrit   Mar-24-09 10:37 AM   #5 
  - Just seems incoherent to me.  bemildred   Mar-24-09 11:23 AM   #8 
  - I had a bit of a WTF?? moment when I tracked down Ziopedia...  Violet_Crumble   Mar-25-09 07:20 AM   #44 
     - Such a long list of "contributors" they have.  bemildred   Mar-25-09 09:18 AM   #45 
  - Trying to figure why this thread has not been locked. nt  ProgressiveMuslim   Mar-25-09 05:56 AM   #25 
  - Why should it be?  cali   Mar-25-09 06:25 AM   #35 
     - You post something and then declare it's hate.  ProgressiveMuslim   Mar-25-09 06:33 AM   #37 
        - you frequently post articles that I consider hate.  cali   Mar-25-09 06:39 AM   #41 
           - I would not dream of posting an article that I knew to be bigoted. It's against forum rules.  ProgressiveMuslim   Mar-25-09 06:48 AM   #42 
              - doesn't matter if Cali thought the OP was hateful  shira   Mar-25-09 06:59 AM   #43 
              - yes, well, what I find hateful and what you find hateful are two different things  cali   Mar-25-09 09:25 AM   #46 
                 - It's all about intention. We're not allowed to post pieces that are bigoted. To do so on purpose?  ProgressiveMuslim   Mar-26-09 06:08 AM   #72 
  - Why even bother posting obviously hateful material?  Idealism   Mar-25-09 12:35 PM   #47 
  - not at all flamebait  cali   Mar-25-09 01:15 PM   #48 
  - I think the problem is Zionism has changed in meaning for many people.  Idealism   Mar-25-09 06:28 PM   #58 
     - a bit off topic  shira   Mar-25-09 06:38 PM   #60 
        - I think the hypothetical you are describing is too off the wall to even describe.  Idealism   Mar-25-09 08:03 PM   #62 
           - can't disagree with you there, thanks!  shira   Mar-25-09 08:33 PM   #64 
  - Perhaps so that we know how the discourse is sometimes affected by hateful attitudes  LeftishBrit   Mar-25-09 02:47 PM   #50 
  - The very title of OP said it for me  azurnoir   Mar-25-09 04:08 PM   #52 
     - lol. yes, it's a conspiracy.  cali   Mar-25-09 04:10 PM   #53 
        - It was just an observation  azurnoir   Mar-25-09 04:17 PM   #54 
           - do you believe the OP is hateful?  shira   Mar-25-09 06:10 PM   #55 
              - I will leave that to your imagination n/t  azurnoir   Mar-25-09 06:17 PM   #57 
                 - no surprise there  shira   Mar-25-09 06:31 PM   #59 
                    - I stated ny case about the article in the first post I made here  azurnoir   Mar-25-09 06:47 PM   #61 
                       - really, that's it? just zionists?  shira   Mar-25-09 08:31 PM   #63 
                          - Ah yeah n/t  azurnoir   Mar-25-09 10:37 PM   #66 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC