You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #2: They have no legal standing to limit access to Gaza. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They have no legal standing to limit access to Gaza.
That's the point. You can sense the frantic search for some justification in the language used. "seek to forcefully block" is already tortured, a combination of passive and active. If they said they "intend to forcefully block" then they would be saying something. Instead we are told they are searching for a justification to do something they have no real right to do, but if they did it, then if would be "forceful", no dicking around.

Or, of course, they could admit Gaza is still occupied and they are responsible for it's residents and their welfare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC