Reply #16: LOL

[tinnypriv]

A geographically tailored barb. I love it. :D

As for the "interpretation", I'll wager all the money in my pockets, for all the money in your pockets, that it is an accurate representation of your views.

Of course, you've stated that "the settlements have to go", but I'm not taking that seriously. That is the standard boilerplate everybody adds.

bemildred laid out some specific proposals which make a great deal of sense. You responded with waffle. The only reasonable conclusion is that you don't want to discuss specifics.

So, either you:

1. Support removal of the settlements but do not wish to lay out any specific means to achieve that goal.

or, (more likely):

2. You do not support removal of the settlements.

If (2) is true, then de facto you support expansion of the settlements and expansion of settlement infrastructure in the occupied territories. This is because natural growth requires both.