You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #20: The Operative Element In Ms. Bennis' Comments, Sir [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. The Operative Element In Ms. Bennis' Comments, Sir
Is that it is the best that could be negotiated in the present climate. That is true, and the strongest grounds possible for acceptance, as the climate is hardly likely to improve, and has in some ways deteriorated even since the private negotiators worked out these arrangements.

The rest of this does not really mean much. None of it would be of the slightest importance if there actually were a cessation of attacks by Arab Palestinian militant bodies against Israel and its citizens, and if these do not cease, there is not going to be peace anyway. To me, stating something gives the U.S. a 'dangerously high level of control', as if U.S. influence in this matter were a bad thing, discredits not the thing being so characterized, but rather the person employing that characterization, and inclines me to view that person as, at best, something of a crank, and that regardless of any credentials that might be mustered in her favor. An extra layer of Israeli security at crossings into Israel through a period of trust-building strikes me as quite appropriate, and complaint there is no reciprocal Arab Palestinian presence is mere formalism: the great killing problem in the situation has been the infiltration into Israel of Arab Palestinian militants bent on attacking Israelis, not any infiltration of Israelis into Palestine bent on killing Arab Palestinians; when the Israelis go in, it is as formed military forces wholly under state control, that no customs shed is going to halt. Items such as early warning stations and aerial exercises do not truely compromise sovereignty, particularly if agreed to by the hosting state. The presence of substantial Israeli military forces in the Jordan valley is more problematic in my view, and always has been in considering this formula. Insistence on it seems to disregard the likelihood that a genuine peace between Israel and Arab Palestine would greatly reduce the potential threat to Israel from the Arab world at large. Were the Geneva formula to actually be put into practice, this element certainly ought to be the object of further negotiations after a space of a few years, by which time the Israelis might well be disposed to dispense with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC