You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Lawyers Target Gun Control's Legal Rationale (WSt.Journal) [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
skippythwndrdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 04:39 PM
Original message
Bush Lawyers Target Gun Control's Legal Rationale (WSt.Journal)
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Fri Jan-07-05 04:41 PM by skippythwndrdog
http://online.wsj.com/public/article/0,,SB1105058569506...


This is bizarre, I'm actually agreeing whole heartedly with the bush administration on something. It must mean the apocalypse is near. I think some apocalypso music is in order. On edit: Could this be payback for gun owners?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Bush Lawyers Target Gun Control's Legal Rationale (WSt.Journal) skippythwndrdog  Jan-07-05 04:39 PM   #0 
  - Typical gun nut legal reasoning  Sandpiper   Jan-07-05 04:42 PM   #1 
  - The Bush position is unnecessary because SCOTUS had two perfect  jody   Jan-07-05 04:53 PM   #2 
  - You misread it!  vpigrad   Jan-07-05 04:58 PM   #3 
  - I believe the thread author read it correct. Many DU members support  jody   Jan-07-05 05:11 PM   #4 
  - Self-select and non-random polls  Spinzonner   Jan-07-05 06:01 PM   #5 
     - I should have said over 60% of the respondents support RKBA.  jody   Jan-07-05 09:19 PM   #8 
        - Oh heck let's just let "respondants" speak for us  Lefty48197   Jan-09-05 01:44 AM   #22 
           - Touché re spelling of "respondants".  jody   Jan-09-05 06:48 AM   #23 
  - Read it perfectly.  skippythwndrdog   Jan-07-05 06:20 PM   #6 
  - We sure as heck don't have "nearly unrestricted access"  benEzra   Jan-08-05 08:11 AM   #15 
  - I dont see anything wrong with...  Jack_DeLeon   Jan-09-05 02:43 PM   #24 
  - So, I am confident we won't hear a peep from all the RKBA crowd  Wickerman   Jan-07-05 08:33 PM   #7 
  - I don't understand your point. Please clarify. n/t  jody   Jan-07-05 09:20 PM   #9 
  - We have had a number of folks post this week saying gun rights should  Wickerman   Jan-07-05 09:28 PM   #10 
     - State rights position taken by Tribe in his book on constitutional law.  jody   Jan-07-05 09:40 PM   #11 
     - And at Yale  Wickerman   Jan-07-05 10:03 PM   #12 
        - But the 5th circuit in U.S. v. Emerson, held it was an individual right.  jody   Jan-08-05 12:41 AM   #14 
        - Senator Kerry said that the 2ndA protects an individual right  benEzra   Jan-08-05 09:11 AM   #16 
     - seems consistent to me...  aikoaiko   Jan-08-05 10:08 AM   #18 
        - I read it as the 2nd option  Wickerman   Jan-08-05 11:11 AM   #19 
           - aight.  aikoaiko   Jan-08-05 11:20 AM   #20 
           - Thinking about it some more...  skippythwndrdog   Jan-08-05 06:58 PM   #21 
  - The individual rights interpretation is not inconsistent...  benEzra   Jan-08-05 09:20 AM   #17 
  - The WSJ headline is misleading  hansberrym   Jan-08-05 12:38 AM   #13 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC