You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #31: That's what the SUMMARY said... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. That's what the SUMMARY said...
Edited on Tue Jan-18-05 12:02 PM by benEzra
but if you read the actual text of the Kennedy amendment, that's not what it DID.

The amendment would have authorized the Attorney General to ban, and I quote,
(iii) a projectile that may be used in a handgun and that the Attorney General determines, pursuant to section 926(d), to be capable of penetrating body armor; or

(iv) a projectile for a centerfire rifle, designed or marketed as having armor piercing capability, that the Attorney General determines, pursuant to section 926(d), to be more likely to penetrate body armor than standard ammunition of the same caliber.''.


Very little ammunition would satisfy paragraph (iv). But practically all rifle calibers under .45-70 would indeed satisfy paragraph (iii); they (1) can be used in a handgun (like a Thompson-Center Contender or Encore, or an SSK single-shot), and (2) they can penetrate level II or IIIA body armor like it's not there.

Since the Attorney General could ban any rifle ammunition that satisfied paragraph (iii), the AG could ban pretty much any he/she wanted. I don't imagine you'd see .30-06 hunting loads banned, even though it would satisfy the AP definition, but I would expect that there would be strong pressure from the prohibitionists to ban .223 and 7.62x39 as having "no sporting purpose."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC