Reply #103: Answer the question, or run away, ... please do what suits you best.

[hansberrym]

Question:
If there were NO individual right to own ANY firearm as The Collective Rights crowd dishonestly claims, why would the Supreme court have sent the case back for further proceedings?



(from Miller)
In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a ‘shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length’ at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument. Certainly it is not within judicial notice that this weapon is any part of the ordinary military equipment or that its use could contribute to the common defense. Aymette v. State of Tennessee, 2 Humph., Tenn., 154, 158.


(Also from Miller)
The cause will be remanded for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded. (end quotes from Miller)