orpupilofnature57
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-09-11 05:11 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
Edited on Fri Dec-09-11 05:13 AM by orpupilofnature57
|
| -1,534,414 gun background checks done in November. On target for 16 million in 2011!! |
Logical |
Dec-07-11 06:07 PM |
#0 |
-
Guns ? " Good Guys " ? Assault weapons are not Guns for sport . Agreed? |
orpupilofnature57 |
Dec-07-11 06:13 PM |
#1 |
 -
I disagree... |
IamK |
Dec-07-11 06:16 PM |
#3 |
  -
I suppose. |
orpupilofnature57 |
Dec-07-11 06:47 PM |
#9 |
 -
REALLY? |
Callisto32 |
Dec-08-11 06:46 AM |
#35 |
 -
No |
orpupilofnature57 |
Dec-09-11 05:25 AM |
#82 |
 -
So you don't suppose. |
Callisto32 |
Dec-09-11 02:34 PM |
#93 |
 -
Got me |
orpupilofnature57 |
Dec-09-11 04:15 PM |
#99 |
 -
There's no substantial difference between an "assault weapon" and a "non-assault-weapon." nt |
TheWraith |
Dec-07-11 06:20 PM |
#4 |
  -
Besides intent ,capability. nt |
orpupilofnature57 |
Dec-07-11 06:45 PM |
#7 |
 -
Oh, cut the crap. |
Dr_Scholl |
Dec-07-11 07:02 PM |
#11 |
  -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Dec-07-11 07:06 PM |
#13 |
   -
Abuse, rejection of commonly used technical terms, and no answer to the question asked. |
friendly_iconoclast |
Dec-07-11 08:15 PM |
#23 |
  -
Thanks , the tea was great ,I still hate 2nd Amendment Paranoia |
orpupilofnature57 |
Dec-09-11 05:15 AM |
#79 |
  -
My AR's and mini do the same thing. the safety on the AR is much better IMHO. |
ileus |
Dec-07-11 08:11 PM |
#20 |
  -
The problem is not with the definition "assault weapon" |
Remmah2 |
Dec-08-11 08:02 AM |
#39 |
   -
I agree ,my problem is Gun Rights that are opposed to Peoples Rights |
orpupilofnature57 |
Dec-09-11 05:28 AM |
#83 |
  -
How do you figure? |
We_Have_A_Problem |
Dec-09-11 08:30 AM |
#86 |
  -
In 1791 it was a necessity ,now it's infringement on well-being. |
orpupilofnature57 |
Dec-10-11 06:05 AM |
#110 |
  -
sorry for the rant. |
orpupilofnature57 |
Dec-09-11 05:11 AM |
#78 |
 -
Difference between apathy and ignorance is easy to explain... |
We_Have_A_Problem |
Dec-09-11 08:32 AM |
#87 |
 -
Not legally available, or nonexistent in the US ? |
orpupilofnature57 |
Dec-09-11 04:15 PM |
#98 |
 -
Full auto AK's are available, price does not include the $200 tax |
oneshooter |
Dec-09-11 08:11 PM |
#103 |
 -
Thanks |
orpupilofnature57 |
Dec-10-11 05:43 AM |
#109 |
 -
As far as intent, the musket was an "assault weapon"... |
Marengo |
Dec-07-11 07:58 PM |
#19 |
  -
Which must of seemed light years ahead of the catapult ,Whats your point ? |
orpupilofnature57 |
Dec-09-11 05:30 AM |
#84 |
 -
Insubstantial terms, defined in your own head, which do not make a weapon "super extra lethal." nt |
TheWraith |
Dec-07-11 09:01 PM |
#28 |
  -
It's capability ,and who's shooting does. |
orpupilofnature57 |
Dec-09-11 05:31 AM |
#85 |
 -
Intent.... |
Callisto32 |
Dec-08-11 06:47 AM |
#36 |
 -
Intent is in the mind of the user |
We_Have_A_Problem |
Dec-08-11 08:25 AM |
#45 |
  -
I paint them with the same brush ,Toys that kill. |
orpupilofnature57 |
Dec-09-11 05:25 AM |
#81 |
 -
Well that's your problem isn't it? n/t |
We_Have_A_Problem |
Dec-09-11 08:33 AM |
#88 |
 -
Capability, there really isn't (most are somewhat less powerful than... |
SteveM |
Dec-08-11 04:28 PM |
#67 |
 -
We can't police peoples minds ,just their modes of murder. |
orpupilofnature57 |
Dec-09-11 05:23 AM |
#80 |
 -
The mode matters not a whit to the victim. Dead is dead. |
friendly_iconoclast |
Dec-09-11 11:43 AM |
#89 |
 -
And what "modes" do you propose for policing?... |
SteveM |
Dec-09-11 03:37 PM |
#95 |
 -
Shrub helped you people out there. |
orpupilofnature57 |
Dec-09-11 04:17 PM |
#100 |
 -
"you people" is who, now? |
SteveM |
Dec-09-11 06:01 PM |
#101 |
  -
You people that split hairs on WMD. |
orpupilofnature57 |
Dec-09-11 07:14 PM |
#102 |
 -
By your metric, Iraq was and is full of "WMD"- not by mine, of course. |
friendly_iconoclast |
Dec-09-11 09:50 PM |
#104 |
 -
Cling to that metric lie ,how many times a day is an ignition turned? |
orpupilofnature57 |
Dec-10-11 05:41 AM |
#108 |
 -
What bans did Bush lift? N/T |
GreenStormCloud |
Dec-10-11 06:38 AM |
#113 |
 -
How did he do that? N/T |
GreenStormCloud |
Dec-10-11 06:37 AM |
#112 |
 -
By promoting the wolf at the edge of the forest ,whilst hiding the beast in the middle |
orpupilofnature57 |
Dec-10-11 08:12 AM |
#118 |
 -
What does that non-answer have to do with assault weapons? N/T |
GreenStormCloud |
Dec-10-11 09:55 AM |
#120 |
 -
Please point out the "sport" provision in the Second Amendment. |
PavePusher |
Dec-07-11 06:47 PM |
#8 |
  -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Dec-07-11 07:03 PM |
#12 |
  -
The number of Bullets that can be fired in a 3 second span ,now before you gild that lily |
orpupilofnature57 |
Dec-10-11 06:09 AM |
#111 |
 -
Every semi auto has about the same rate of fire in 3 seconds. |
We_Have_A_Problem |
Dec-12-11 08:52 AM |
#121 |
 -
By "assault weapons" are you referring to AR-15 platforms? |
oneshooter |
Dec-08-11 08:20 AM |
#43 |
 -
Nope, not agreed. |
We_Have_A_Problem |
Dec-08-11 08:24 AM |
#44 |
  -
No I wouldn't. |
orpupilofnature57 |
Dec-10-11 08:16 AM |
#119 |
 -
Still waiting for a coherent answer. n/t |
PavePusher |
Dec-08-11 10:04 AM |
#49 |
 -
Not agreed... |
SteveM |
Dec-08-11 04:25 PM |
#65 |
 -
Still waiting..... |
PavePusher |
Dec-08-11 10:46 PM |
#77 |
-
shoot'em if you got'em...... n/t |
IamK |
Dec-07-11 06:14 PM |
#2 |
 -
RIP |
orpupilofnature57 |
Dec-07-11 07:16 PM |
#15 |
-
I'm not sure Democrats are fighting it all that much |
tularetom |
Dec-07-11 06:31 PM |
#5 |
-
I take issue with your last sentence. |
WHEN CRABS ROAR |
Dec-07-11 06:41 PM |
#6 |
 -
"Nobody is coming for your guns." |
PavePusher |
Dec-07-11 06:48 PM |
#10 |
-
National Redneck Association has always been paranoid. ,lack of socialization. |
orpupilofnature57 |
Dec-07-11 07:08 PM |
#14 |
 -
What other segment of the 99 percent do you detest? |
gejohnston |
Dec-07-11 07:26 PM |
#16 |
  -
Flea=baggers too. Who are you?you |
orpupilofnature57 |
Dec-08-11 05:09 AM |
#32 |
 -
O.K., you'll have to unpack that a bit more. Some of us have had a long day. n/t |
PavePusher |
Dec-07-11 09:25 PM |
#30 |
  -
Not too tired to push paranoia of stalinist plots or as Always, abolishing the 2nd. |
orpupilofnature57 |
Dec-08-11 05:14 AM |
#33 |
 -
I think "National Reprobate's Association" is more appropriate |
DrDan |
Dec-08-11 08:17 AM |
#42 |
  -
Thank you,, I'm a space case. |
orpupilofnature57 |
Dec-10-11 08:07 AM |
#116 |
 -
Well, I thought you might want to discuss the question you raised. Sorry.nt |
SteveM |
Dec-08-11 04:32 PM |
#68 |
-
All the evidence? But not much common sense to back that up. |
WHEN CRABS ROAR |
Dec-07-11 11:27 PM |
#31 |
-
I own guns I have a concealed carry permit I am just |
doc03 |
Dec-07-11 07:44 PM |
#17 |
 -
I am also against the NRA! They are a right wing group of nuts! |
Logical |
Dec-07-11 07:55 PM |
#18 |
  -
I don't think a week passes that one of my friends that |
doc03 |
Dec-07-11 08:11 PM |
#21 |
 -
Paranoia |
TheCowsCameHome |
Dec-07-11 08:15 PM |
#22 |
 -
Great points, and now they are saying Obama is just waiting for 2016 to ban all guns.... |
Logical |
Dec-07-11 08:17 PM |
#24 |
  -
They use the same techniques as the various Brady orgs. - but they're better at it. |
friendly_iconoclast |
Dec-07-11 08:32 PM |
#25 |
  -
That's the latest Wayne LaPierre vast left wing conspiracy |
doc03 |
Dec-07-11 08:40 PM |
#26 |
 -
So true, no message is delivered without asking for money! |
Logical |
Dec-07-11 08:54 PM |
#27 |
 -
I am a member of the NRA but I don't get those e-mails. Why not? N/T |
GreenStormCloud |
Dec-10-11 06:43 AM |
#114 |
 -
1865 SYNDROME!!!!!!! And thats it a yen for antebellum . |
orpupilofnature57 |
Dec-10-11 08:10 AM |
#117 |
 -
self delete |
gejohnston |
Dec-07-11 09:01 PM |
#29 |
-
can you please provide a link that demonstrates that the reduction in crime is due to more guns |
DrDan |
Dec-08-11 05:42 AM |
#34 |
 -
Settin up that old strawman again eh? |
Callisto32 |
Dec-08-11 06:53 AM |
#37 |
-
Fundamental Christianity has been on the rise - how do you know that is not |
DrDan |
Dec-08-11 07:44 AM |
#38 |
-
You are asking for proof to a claim THAT NO-ONE MADE. |
PavePusher |
Dec-08-11 08:08 AM |
#40 |
 -
it was certainly implied, now wasn't it |
DrDan |
Dec-08-11 08:09 AM |
#41 |
-
No it was not implied |
We_Have_A_Problem |
Dec-08-11 08:27 AM |
#46 |
 -
of couse it was implied |
DrDan |
Dec-08-11 09:32 AM |
#47 |
-
People who actually look at the data and think. n/t |
PavePusher |
Dec-08-11 10:03 AM |
#48 |
-
and what conclusion would they derive? |
DrDan |
Dec-08-11 10:12 AM |
#50 |
-
The conclusion which has been pointed out time and time again.... |
We_Have_A_Problem |
Dec-08-11 10:27 AM |
#51 |
-
could you please post a link supporting that |
DrDan |
Dec-08-11 10:28 AM |
#52 |
-
Uh - look upthread |
We_Have_A_Problem |
Dec-08-11 10:33 AM |
#53 |
-
the drop in crime is obviously based on multiple factors |
DrDan |
Dec-08-11 11:27 AM |
#56 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Dec-08-11 01:31 PM |
#61 |
-
ok - so crime is going down - gun sales are going up |
DrDan |
Dec-08-11 03:09 PM |
#62 |
-
"Show that guns are not producing more crime..." That's not what you asked originally |
friendly_iconoclast |
Dec-08-11 03:27 PM |
#63 |
 -
obviously the relationship between crime and gun sales, that |
DrDan |
Dec-08-11 03:58 PM |
#64 |
-
If a decrease has occured |
We_Have_A_Problem |
Dec-08-11 04:26 PM |
#66 |
 -
that is akin to saying |
DrDan |
Dec-08-11 04:41 PM |
#71 |
-
Not QUITE. |
We_Have_A_Problem |
Dec-09-11 04:11 PM |
#97 |
-
ok - so your claim is that |
DrDan |
Dec-10-11 04:36 AM |
#106 |
-
let me restate the calorie example like this . . . |
DrDan |
Dec-10-11 05:39 AM |
#107 |
-
now, you've implied dismissal of your own Straw Man! jeeez. nt |
SteveM |
Dec-08-11 04:36 PM |
#70 |
-
Not implied at all, just disproving the "More guns=More crimes" meme. nt |
SteveM |
Dec-08-11 04:34 PM |
#69 |
 -
"disproving"??????????????? |
DrDan |
Dec-08-11 04:43 PM |
#72 |
-
Would you prefer "the more guns=more crime" contention be manifestly unproven? |
SteveM |
Dec-09-11 03:39 PM |
#96 |
-
No, THIS IS WHAT WAS IMPLIED: |
Callisto32 |
Dec-09-11 11:44 AM |
#91 |
-
Thanks for....proving my point....while simultaneously missing it entirely. |
Callisto32 |
Dec-09-11 11:43 AM |
#90 |
-
enjoy your delusion |
DrDan |
Dec-09-11 02:29 PM |
#92 |
-
I said we can't know the cause with certainty... |
Callisto32 |
Dec-09-11 03:13 PM |
#94 |
-
let me make sure I understand your point (seriously) |
DrDan |
Dec-10-11 04:32 AM |
#105 |
-
16 million more guns! You'd think |
montanto |
Dec-08-11 11:10 AM |
#54 |
 -
Weird isn't it? It is almost like more guns do not mean more crime. Hmmmm |
Logical |
Dec-08-11 11:21 AM |
#55 |
  -
any studies to substantiate that? |
DrDan |
Dec-08-11 11:42 AM |
#57 |
   -
The proof that guns cause more crime is your deal! |
Logical |
Dec-08-11 11:52 AM |
#58 |
  -
you seem to be implying they do not raise the rate - or am I misreading your post |
DrDan |
Dec-08-11 12:40 PM |
#60 |
  -
My claim is more guns do not equal more crime. Not more guns equals less crime. |
Logical |
Dec-08-11 04:50 PM |
#73 |
  -
They don't. You didn't. |
montanto |
Dec-08-11 05:17 PM |
#76 |
  -
Certainly nothing like you'd expect fom listening to the anti- |
montanto |
Dec-08-11 05:02 PM |
#74 |
 -
The 16 million number does not necessarily |
burf |
Dec-08-11 12:24 PM |
#59 |
-
Yeah, I get that. |
montanto |
Dec-08-11 05:16 PM |
#75 |
-
In some states a CCW can be shown and no background check is needed. |
GreenStormCloud |
Dec-10-11 06:48 AM |
#115 |