Reply #46: Is that a requiement for defending oneself from violence?

[Atypical Liberal]

Much better to just strap a gun or two on so you can shoot someone without breaking a sweat.

Why?

Why is it a requirement that people who would resist violent assault need to break a sweat to do it?

Is not their lives being in danger sufficient? Why should one need to sweat while defending themselves? In what way is someone who sweats while defending themselves from violence superior to someone who does not?

I would think that everyone, weak, strong, young, old, should have the right to defend themselves from violence using whatever means suits them best.

Sweat is optional.