Reply #40: iverglas, iverglas

[TPaine7]

There will be no repercussions, huh? Is there something you'd like to tell us, iverglas? Have you purchased DU? Do you have a deal with Skinner or the moderators? Or do you think that any reply you can muster qualifies as a "repercussion"?

And I love your challenge. I must name you as being in one school or you will understand that I am assigning you to another? Understand what you will, iverglas. I am sure that 99% of the readers have a clear understanding of your status and did before I posted the OP.

You have named yourself. Public opinion follows your lead. Recognition of reality is not the strange, dark art that you imagine it to be.



Naturally, you probably think that the OP was about you, don't you, "Goddess of Truth and Beauty"? And you claim I'm a narcissist!

Here's a free clue. Joe Blow may be a pathetic fool, but that does not mean that every time someone discusses pathetic fools they have Joe Blow in mind. There are other pathetic fools. There are people who talk about pathetic fools who don't even know that Joe Blow exists. But if Joe Blow is a narcissist as well as a pathetic fool, he will assume that they all have him, personally, in mind.



When I choose to unmask you, I never require your consent. When you offer your consent, it will not induce me to unmask you.

To put it bluntly, your consent is inconsequential.