Reply #85: She was assaulted but not injured or killed, so technically, the conditions weren't met.

[TPaine7]

There's a reason I address iverglas as "Your Sophistry"; I wouldn't be at all surprised to see that argument made. Also, we don't know for certain that she would have been raped, even if the perpetrator had condoms, lube and a written notes describing his intentions. The sherrif isn't absolutely sure (as in to a mathematical proof level certainty) either.

The way the challenge is worded, only God could answer it. And it would probably have to be done personally--no using signs and wonders or sending angelic messengers.

And, to be fair, while iverglas was quoting the thug's declared intentions as authority the story hadn't been updated to the place it is now (see Tejas's post below and the reply regarding the change). I tried to point out that the word of a guy with a weapon to your throat is worthless, but to no avail. Then more facts came out.

Facts and evidence are very inconvenient to devotees of the Gun Control Reality Distortion Field.