You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #64: You dont know? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
Avant Guardian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-11 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #59
64. You dont know?
GOP style madness says 'Arm everybody, everywhere, all the time, guns in schools, colleges, on airplanes...yada yada yada, and everybody will be safer! Duh! Duh Duh!'

You know, GOP style madness...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Mass gun confiscations HAVE occurred in the US....Why Gun Registration is a complete NO GO virginia mountainman  Apr-04-11 03:03 PM   #0 
  - Tough Crap  HERVEPA   Apr-04-11 03:04 PM   #1 
  - This is why my guns are NOT registered...  virginia mountainman   Apr-04-11 03:05 PM   #2 
  - so, you're NOT a law-abiding gun owner? n/t  Scout   Apr-04-11 03:08 PM   #4 
  - Actually I am in full complance with the law...  virginia mountainman   Apr-04-11 03:11 PM   #7 
  - How refreshing  Starboard Tack   Apr-04-11 10:16 PM   #45 
     - ???? n/t  PavePusher   Apr-04-11 10:55 PM   #54 
  - I believe gun registration is against the law in Florida ...  spin   Apr-04-11 04:05 PM   #25 
  - Most states do not require registration. N/T  GreenStormCloud   Apr-04-11 07:10 PM   #29 
  - And that is a good thing. nt  Mojorabbit   Apr-06-11 01:44 AM   #116 
  - Based on court law, criminals don't have to register their firearms,  lawodevolution   Apr-04-11 07:12 PM   #31 
  - Brilliant! Let anarchy rule. But I agree that  Starboard Tack   Apr-04-11 10:31 PM   #47 
     - No, guns should not be registered. The only use of such a system in the US is confiscation  lawodevolution   Apr-05-11 08:24 AM   #78 
        - Whats wrong with getting guns out of the hands of those who are unfit? nt  right2bfree   Apr-07-11 12:35 AM   #143 
           - Nothing.  beevul   Apr-07-11 01:28 AM   #146 
  - You are ignorant of the law, it seems... n/t  PavePusher   Apr-04-11 07:13 PM   #33 
  - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Apr-07-11 12:34 AM   #142 
  - Good!  mysuzuki2   Apr-04-11 03:14 PM   #9 
  - This is why NOBODY wants to talk to the gun control side  rl6214   Apr-04-11 03:35 PM   #19 
  - Eloquent!  slackmaster   Apr-04-11 03:37 PM   #20 
  - "Tough crap". Its interesting to see how progressive some really are when rights get trampled.  cleanhippie   Apr-04-11 07:09 PM   #27 
  - May I have a list of all your books and papers, please?  PavePusher   Apr-04-11 07:12 PM   #30 
  - Sounds like registration false under the "well-regulated militia" clause. nt  Deep13   Apr-04-11 03:06 PM   #3 
  - Well regulated = Properly functioning... Not control something by making it subject to rules or laws  Glassunion   Apr-04-11 03:26 PM   #12 
     - How do you make it function properly without ...  Deep13   Apr-05-11 08:11 AM   #75 
        - The militia regulates itself  slackmaster   Apr-05-11 10:32 AM   #88 
        - Look at it like this...  Glassunion   Apr-05-11 11:23 AM   #91 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-04-11 03:09 PM   #5 
  - Here is the funny thing about that.  Glassunion   Apr-04-11 03:16 PM   #10 
  - There is no federal registration.  AtheistCrusader   Apr-04-11 03:27 PM   #13 
  - Questions...  Glassunion   Apr-04-11 03:31 PM   #16 
  - To what end? To make fools accountable  Starboard Tack   Apr-04-11 10:23 PM   #46 
     - You realize they can already do that.  Glassunion   Apr-05-11 06:36 AM   #70 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-04-11 03:41 PM   #22 
  - Owners of unregistered guns should  KaoriMitsubishi   Apr-04-11 03:11 PM   #6 
  - You do realize that most states do *NOT* require the registration of all firearms...  Glassunion   Apr-04-11 03:19 PM   #11 
  - Do *NOT* require.  AtheistCrusader   Apr-04-11 03:28 PM   #14 
     - tnx... edited.  Glassunion   Apr-04-11 03:32 PM   #17 
  - Owners of cars that are stolen and used in a crime should also get life in prison  DonP   Apr-04-11 04:04 PM   #24 
  - Inventing new crimes...  PavePusher   Apr-04-11 07:15 PM   #34 
  - How does gun registration help again?  YllwFvr   Apr-04-11 03:14 PM   #8 
  - IF someone registers their gun, AND they use it in a crime, AND they leave the gun behind  AtheistCrusader   Apr-04-11 03:30 PM   #15 
  - Personally, I see many downsides that outweigh the benefit.  Glassunion   Apr-04-11 03:34 PM   #18 
  - It does not help... At all.  Glassunion   Apr-04-11 03:51 PM   #23 
  - I was aware of some of those  YllwFvr   Apr-04-11 09:27 PM   #37 
  - might check the source on the Bush quote...  Flyboy_451   Apr-04-11 09:44 PM   #41 
     - Good catch... Times change...  Glassunion   Apr-05-11 11:09 AM   #90 
  - How many billions spent in Canada ?  Katya Mullethov   Apr-05-11 07:23 AM   #73 
     - They can't point to a single arrest  YllwFvr   Apr-05-11 08:06 AM   #74 
  - Haynes v. United States, 1968... n/t  Glassunion   Apr-04-11 03:41 PM   #21 
  - Good  Avant Guardian   Apr-04-11 07:03 PM   #26 
  - Maybe we should advocate confiscating your computer to silence your speech too?  cleanhippie   Apr-04-11 07:12 PM   #32 
  - Im not typing on a military computer  Avant Guardian   Apr-04-11 09:37 PM   #38 
     - But you *could*, if so inclined, use it to commit crimes.  friendly_iconoclast   Apr-04-11 10:40 PM   #50 
     - And the number of military firearms in private hands is vanishingly small.  PavePusher   Apr-04-11 10:49 PM   #51 
     - Um, isn't the www based on a military network?  Union Scribe   Apr-05-11 03:10 AM   #67 
     - Yep. The Internet is an outgrowth of ARPANET, started by the Defense Department.  friendly_iconoclast   Apr-05-11 06:49 PM   #102 
        - Oh noes1!1!!1!11!  PavePusher   Apr-05-11 11:57 PM   #114 
        - The Internet was designed to be resistant to nuclear attacks  slackmaster   Apr-06-11 09:00 AM   #119 
     - What's a "military" computer?  Euromutt   Apr-05-11 09:52 AM   #86 
  - What "military weapons" are you talking about?  PavePusher   Apr-04-11 07:16 PM   #35 
  - All military weapons from assault rifles on up  Avant Guardian   Apr-04-11 09:38 PM   #39 
     - Your obviously not military...  virginia mountainman   Apr-04-11 09:55 PM   #42 
     - You mean the 'civilian' AR15 rifles that have turned Mexico into a violent hellhole?  Avant Guardian   Apr-04-11 10:02 PM   #43 
        - AR15s are banned for civilians in Mexico, IIRC. How's that working out?  friendly_iconoclast   Apr-04-11 10:34 PM   #48 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-04-11 10:59 PM   #57 
           - That's your second strawman argument in less than an hour.  friendly_iconoclast   Apr-04-11 11:06 PM   #59 
              - You dont know?  Avant Guardian   Apr-04-11 11:45 PM   #64 
                 - Cite to evidence, please?  PavePusher   Apr-05-11 08:15 AM   #77 
                 - You'll see clear video of a live chupacabra before you see *that* evidence n/t  friendly_iconoclast   Apr-05-11 12:08 PM   #92 
                    - **Snort**  PavePusher   Apr-05-11 06:01 PM   #99 
                       - By ass*oles with assault weapons, no less!!!1!!  burrfoot   Apr-07-11 12:50 AM   #145 
                 - Total fabrication and dishonesty in your post.  cleanhippie   Apr-05-11 09:31 AM   #84 
        - I'm not sure you know what you are talking about.  PavePusher   Apr-04-11 10:52 PM   #52 
        - That is where I got my information  Avant Guardian   Apr-04-11 11:00 PM   #58 
           - Then it seems you did not understand it. n/t  PavePusher   Apr-04-11 11:20 PM   #60 
              - I understand the part that says it was designed for military use  Avant Guardian   Apr-04-11 11:41 PM   #63 
                 - You missed this part...  Straw Man   Apr-05-11 12:09 AM   #65 
                 - I can't think of a gun  rrneck   Apr-05-11 12:12 AM   #66 
                 - What part of 'from assault rifles on up' do you not understand?  Avant Guardian   Apr-05-11 07:14 AM   #72 
                    - You need to look up the definition of "assault rifle".  PavePusher   Apr-05-11 08:14 AM   #76 
                    - You don't have a clue what you're writing about  slackmaster   Apr-05-11 08:48 AM   #80 
                    - What part of vanishingly rare do you not undetstand?  rrneck   Apr-05-11 09:52 AM   #85 
                    - You do know that "assault rifles" are fully automatic don't you?  rl6214   Apr-05-11 12:35 PM   #94 
                 - This is where we reach our impasse then.  NewMoonTherian   Apr-05-11 03:57 AM   #69 
                 - LOL  Avant Guardian   Apr-05-11 07:13 AM   #71 
                    - I didn't make myself entirely clear.  NewMoonTherian   Apr-05-11 10:07 AM   #87 
                       - Your fantasy of taking on the US military is absurd  Avant Guardian   Apr-05-11 05:44 PM   #97 
                          - It's clearly absurd.  NewMoonTherian   Apr-05-11 05:53 PM   #98 
                          - You want to pit civilians against 'We the people?'  Avant Guardian   Apr-05-11 07:21 PM   #103 
                             - Um...  rrneck   Apr-05-11 07:46 PM   #105 
                             - So, liberals are pushing for a total armed society?  Avant Guardian   Apr-05-11 07:48 PM   #106 
                                - Who here has that objective?  rrneck   Apr-05-11 07:50 PM   #107 
                                - Havent you heard the news?  Avant Guardian   Apr-05-11 10:58 PM   #110 
                                - Now, to be fair, I never advocated for a total armed society.  NewMoonTherian   Apr-05-11 11:07 PM   #111 
                                - "Now, to be fair, I never advocated for a total armed society."  Avant Guardian   Apr-06-11 10:34 AM   #121 
                                - You need to produce a quote  rrneck   Apr-05-11 11:19 PM   #112 
                                - oops  Avant Guardian   Apr-06-11 10:32 AM   #120 
                                - OK  Avant Guardian   Apr-06-11 10:35 AM   #122 
                                - Oh, sorry. You can read.  rrneck   Apr-06-11 11:03 AM   #129 
                                - I've terribly miscommunicated my position, I'm afraid.  NewMoonTherian   Apr-06-11 10:01 PM   #140 
                                - It's hard to defend hyperbole isn't it? nt  rrneck   Apr-06-11 01:27 PM   #134 
                             - Wow. You've actually given me a good bit to think about. Thanks for the post!  NewMoonTherian   Apr-05-11 10:42 PM   #109 
                          - Better tell some South-Western Asian yahoos...  PavePusher   Apr-05-11 06:03 PM   #100 
                 - All firearms were originally designed for military use  slackmaster   Apr-05-11 08:49 AM   #81 
                 - See: 'Asssault rifles on up'  Avant Guardian   Apr-05-11 07:42 PM   #104 
                    - Define "assault rifle".  rrneck   Apr-05-11 07:52 PM   #108 
                    - Military assault rifles are capable of automatic or burst fire, and are therefore strictly regulated  slackmaster   Apr-06-11 08:57 AM   #118 
                 - So was the bolt action rifle, the lever action repeater, the semi auto rifle  DonP   Apr-05-11 08:59 AM   #83 
                 - Don't forget the Brown Bess  Euromutt   Apr-06-11 07:40 PM   #139 
                 - The name "AR-15" got applied to different designs  Euromutt   Apr-05-11 05:04 PM   #96 
                 - Colt marketed the M16 to military  rl6214   Apr-06-11 12:15 AM   #115 
        - More here....  PavePusher   Apr-04-11 11:25 PM   #61 
        - You every study any history?  one-eyed fat man   Apr-05-11 08:57 AM   #82 
        - All guns were originally designed for military use.  GreenStormCloud   Apr-05-11 06:37 PM   #101 
     - Again, specifics, please...? n/t  PavePusher   Apr-04-11 10:57 PM   #55 
  - The police and military would have a hard time doing their jobs if that happened  slackmaster   Apr-04-11 08:21 PM   #36 
  - The police and military arent civilians  Avant Guardian   Apr-04-11 09:38 PM   #40 
     - Police are most definitely 'civilians'.  PavePusher   Apr-04-11 10:54 PM   #53 
     - Now you are grasping at straws  Avant Guardian   Apr-06-11 10:36 AM   #123 
        - I merely stated a fact.  PavePusher   Apr-06-11 11:08 AM   #131 
           - I state fact  Avant Guardian   Apr-06-11 12:46 PM   #133 
              - This is one of the rare instances where I must disagree with a dictionary.  PavePusher   Apr-06-11 01:29 PM   #135 
                 - Your beef isn't with me  Avant Guardian   Apr-06-11 05:12 PM   #137 
                    - Feel free to place yourself subordinate to the UCMJ at any time.  PavePusher   Apr-07-11 10:59 AM   #152 
     - Actually the police are  rl6214   Apr-04-11 10:57 PM   #56 
     - Oh dear, you are not good at this.  Union Scribe   Apr-05-11 03:11 AM   #68 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-06-11 10:38 AM   #125 
     - Goalpost move, and police are in fact civilians  slackmaster   Apr-05-11 08:39 AM   #79 
        - So, arming the cops = a 'police state?'  Avant Guardian   Apr-06-11 10:37 AM   #124 
           - Perhaps the tought  Glassunion   Apr-06-11 10:40 AM   #126 
              - Lets compromise then  Avant Guardian   Apr-06-11 10:42 AM   #127 
                 - Well what would you call it  Glassunion   Apr-06-11 10:59 AM   #128 
                    - I call it 'not anarchy'  Avant Guardian   Apr-06-11 11:04 AM   #130 
                       - It is hardly a fantasy.  Glassunion   Apr-06-11 11:22 AM   #132 
                          - Fantasy, delusion, whichever...  Avant Guardian   Apr-06-11 05:20 PM   #138 
                             - Is observation of verifyable facts defined by fantasy or delusion in your book?  Glassunion   Apr-07-11 09:09 AM   #150 
  - Seriously  RSillsbee   Apr-04-11 11:35 PM   #62 
  - Exactly. CA and NY have done a pretty good job on assault weapons. But...  right2bfree   Apr-07-11 12:39 AM   #144 
     - Why do "we need a new AW ban"?  beevul   Apr-07-11 01:32 AM   #147 
     - Don't hpld your breath waiting for an answer.  oneshooter   Apr-07-11 05:57 PM   #156 
     - Congress won't pass it. It won't even get out of committees. N/T  GreenStormCloud   Apr-07-11 09:44 AM   #151 
     - I bet you cannot even correctly DEFINE an "AW"  virginia mountainman   Apr-07-11 02:51 PM   #154 
        - .  Glassunion   Apr-07-11 02:57 PM   #155 
  - gun registration systems can't be used to solve crimes or in court due to the 5th which  lawodevolution   Apr-04-11 07:10 PM   #28 
  - So vehicle registration systems can't be used to solve crimes due to the 5th?  Avant Guardian   Apr-04-11 10:12 PM   #44 
     - And here I'd thought certain other posters had used up all the straw.  friendly_iconoclast   Apr-04-11 10:36 PM   #49 
     - link to a case in which vehicle registration was used to prosecute a criminal please  lawodevolution   Apr-05-11 12:26 PM   #93 
  - That's why people who want outright gun bans go for total registration first  WatsonT   Apr-05-11 10:46 AM   #89 
  - Yep.  cleanhippie   Apr-05-11 03:43 PM   #95 
     - And for some reason, they think we won't notice.  friendly_iconoclast   Apr-05-11 11:49 PM   #113 
        - Of course they'll always retort with:  WatsonT   Apr-06-11 03:30 PM   #136 
  - Disturbing...  Xela   Apr-06-11 08:49 AM   #117 
  - Pretty simple, folks. If you like your guns, California is not the place to go!!!  right2bfree   Apr-07-11 12:33 AM   #141 
     - That too will change.  beevul   Apr-07-11 01:34 AM   #148 
     - That's always been my philosophy.  NewMoonTherian   Apr-07-11 01:44 AM   #149 
     - Your disdain for Constitutional Rights is noted.  PavePusher   Apr-07-11 11:04 AM   #153 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC