louis-t
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-30-11 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
| 22. Ah, the Ted Nugent argument. |
|
Edited on Wed Mar-30-11 04:07 PM by louis-t
The good guys are always perfect in their assessment of the situation, always hit their target with one shot (right between the eyes, I believe), and I think they always blow the smoke from the barrel when they're done, don't they? You were making excuses for why the law 'biden cit-zen didn't take out the shooter (because he got there after the fact). We make fun of the rhetoric (If only there had been...) especially when an unarmed, little old lady disarmed the guy by grabbing the full clip away from him when he went to reload (she 'assessed' the situation pretty well, don't you think?). Another unarmed citizen tackled the guy while a third unarmed guy grabbed the weapon. The only armed guy in the crowd came by after the fact, took a bead on the wrong guy (he DIDN'T assess the situation very well now, did he?) and damned near shot him. Any other stupid questions?
|
| -If only President Ronald Reagan and James Brady had been protected by guns 30 years ago today. |
onehandle |
Mar-30-11 02:59 PM |
#0 |
 -
Yeah, but EVERYONE didn't have a gun. That would have helped. |
buddysmellgood |
Mar-30-11 03:00 PM |
#1 |
| -
Armed secret service couldn't prevent... |
hlthe2b |
Mar-30-11 03:02 PM |
#2 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Mar-30-11 03:03 PM |
#4 |
| -
and your typical tactic to resort to ad hominem attacks is likewise |
hlthe2b |
Mar-30-11 03:04 PM |
#5 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Mar-30-11 03:08 PM |
#8 |
| -
Even in the gungeon you don't get to call out Duers simply reporting |
hlthe2b |
Mar-30-11 03:09 PM |
#9 |
| -
You didn't report facts. |
PavePusher |
Mar-30-11 03:20 PM |
#13 |
| -
back at you. |
hlthe2b |
Mar-30-11 03:23 PM |
#14 |
| -
The facts? |
Straw Man |
Mar-30-11 03:23 PM |
#15 |
| -
You need to check who you are responding to. |
hlthe2b |
Mar-30-11 03:25 PM |
#16 |
| -
Responding to you AND the OP. |
Straw Man |
Mar-30-11 03:59 PM |
#20 |
| -
That is damned ridiculous. |
hlthe2b |
Mar-30-11 04:06 PM |
#21 |
| -
Not at all. You were defending the OP. I made an error... |
Straw Man |
Mar-30-11 07:07 PM |
#36 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Mar-30-11 11:00 PM |
#41 |
| -
And he almost shot the wrong guy. |
louis-t |
Mar-30-11 03:05 PM |
#6 |
| -
Since he never even drew his gun.... |
PavePusher |
Mar-30-11 03:07 PM |
#7 |
| -
Had his hand on the weapon, ready to draw. |
louis-t |
Mar-30-11 03:12 PM |
#10 |
| -
Had the shooter still been armed, it wouldn't have taken much deliberating to determine the threat. |
PavePusher |
Mar-30-11 03:18 PM |
#12 |
| -
Ah, the Ted Nugent argument. |
louis-t |
Mar-30-11 04:06 PM |
#22 |
| -
FALSE. |
GreenStormCloud |
Mar-30-11 04:32 PM |
#24 |
| -
"took a bead" meaning had his eyes on him. |
louis-t |
Mar-30-11 06:06 PM |
#31 |
| -
Perhaps you should check a phrase dictionary. |
GreenStormCloud |
Mar-30-11 06:30 PM |
#35 |
| -
You still have not proven the gun was "jammed' |
louis-t |
Mar-31-11 02:46 PM |
#42 |
| -
Nope; bead sights are typically found on shotguns |
Euromutt |
Apr-01-11 04:55 AM |
#43 |
| -
There are more cases where an "armed citizen" perpetrated a massacre. |
Hoyt |
Apr-01-11 09:53 AM |
#46 |
| -
Yep, old unarmed folks came to rescue. But the pro-gun boys will be ready next time. |
Hoyt |
Apr-01-11 09:48 AM |
#45 |
| -
"Almost shot" is exactly the same thing as "didn't shoot" |
slackmaster |
Mar-30-11 05:10 PM |
#29 |
| -
Again, the only people selling CCW as a magic shield against all forms of attack under all condition |
AtheistCrusader |
Mar-30-11 04:17 PM |
#23 |
| -
Odd, but I don't recall anyone ever saying... |
PavePusher |
Mar-30-11 03:02 PM |
#3 |
| -
You sick? |
elleng |
Mar-30-11 03:18 PM |
#11 |
| -
So true. +100 |
applegrove |
Mar-30-11 03:30 PM |
#17 |
| -
LOL! Yeah, and if only JFK had had a Glock in a shoulder holster in Dallas that day. |
damntexdem |
Mar-30-11 03:38 PM |
#18 |
| -
Clearly, therefore we should dissolve the Secret Service. And the Army. |
TheWraith |
Mar-30-11 03:42 PM |
#19 |
| -
This post is pure flamebait. |
cleanhippie |
Mar-30-11 04:48 PM |
#25 |
| -
Ya think? |
RSillsbee |
Mar-30-11 06:11 PM |
#33 |
| -
Makes me wonder why some get locked and others allowed? |
cleanhippie |
Mar-30-11 08:14 PM |
#38 |
| -
If someone is determined to murder you, and is willing to sacrifice themselves to do it... |
GreenStormCloud |
Mar-30-11 04:51 PM |
#26 |
| -
No defense is perfect. |
Atypical Liberal |
Mar-30-11 05:07 PM |
#27 |
| -
Auto-Unrec and Nuke for flame-bait straw man post |
slackmaster |
Mar-30-11 05:10 PM |
#28 |
| -
Why don't the Secret Service go unarmed then? |
Atypical Liberal |
Mar-30-11 05:36 PM |
#30 |
| -
Guns worked pretty well in defending Truman in 1950. N/T |
GreenStormCloud |
Mar-30-11 06:11 PM |
#32 |
| -
Ban Jodie Foster it's the only way to be safe NT |
RSillsbee |
Mar-30-11 06:13 PM |
#34 |
| -
Been a number of assassination attempts on U.S. Presidents--a few were successful but most were not |
Kennah |
Mar-30-11 07:38 PM |
#37 |
| -
stupid thread |
lawodevolution |
Mar-30-11 10:30 PM |
#39 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Mar-30-11 10:31 PM |
#40 |
| -
If only handguns had in effect been illegal in D.C. at the time |
Euromutt |
Apr-01-11 05:27 AM |
#44 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread