You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #6: 2nd Amendment [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
Porterhouse Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. 2nd Amendment
is not about hunting. When will you anti's learn about history? In the meantime, keep flailing around, it's entertaining as hell to watch the anti's make complete fools of themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Why Congress Should Ban High-Volume Ammo Clips jpak  Feb-15-11 12:15 PM   #0 
  - "weapons of mass destruction" -- lol  X_Digger   Feb-15-11 12:22 PM   #1 
  - "weapons of mass destruction"- yup  jpak   Feb-15-11 12:30 PM   #2 
  - So Bush was right about Iraq, then? Lots of 30-round AK mags were found there.  friendly_iconoclast   Feb-15-11 01:04 PM   #17 
  - Bush is an asshole - large cap mags suck  jpak   Feb-15-11 01:25 PM   #24 
  - More like posts of mass ignorance.  cleanhippie   Feb-16-11 10:29 AM   #109 
  - Thank you for conceding  derby378   Feb-16-11 06:06 PM   #113 
  - Is it also 19 slaughtered in Tucson, LOL?  damntexdem   Feb-15-11 12:56 PM   #10 
     - I laugh at the knee-jerk legislative wharrgarble that is divorced from reality.  X_Digger   Feb-15-11 01:01 PM   #14 
     - "Divorce from reality" is to ignore mass murder in Tuscon wrought by high cap mags  jpak   Feb-15-11 01:27 PM   #25 
        - Well I guess I learned something new today  Porterhouse   Feb-15-11 01:31 PM   #28 
        - *stomp* *stomp* *stomp* -- woops, got some blood on your pantleg. n/t  X_Digger   Feb-15-11 01:34 PM   #30 
        - It's awesome when a person with such a motto calls others authoritarians.  Callisto32   Feb-15-11 01:37 PM   #34 
        - To equate mass murder with high cap mags is a divorce from reality  DissedByBush   Feb-16-11 09:20 PM   #120 
     - Are you another Bush apologist, then?  friendly_iconoclast   Feb-15-11 01:08 PM   #20 
     - The magazines used in the shootings were legal  YllwFvr   Feb-15-11 01:09 PM   #21 
     - No they weren't - they were limited to 10 rounds  jpak   Feb-15-11 02:24 PM   #59 
        - Yes they were legal  Porterhouse   Feb-15-11 02:33 PM   #64 
        - Yes - it was a bad law in that respect - it should have banned them  jpak   Feb-15-11 03:03 PM   #72 
           - I actually agree with you  Porterhouse   Feb-15-11 03:08 PM   #75 
           - How do you get around the pesky Fifth amendment?  one-eyed fat man   Feb-15-11 08:34 PM   #97 
        - Derp derp derp.  X_Digger   Feb-15-11 02:37 PM   #66 
        - You have no idea what you are talking about. The way you display your ignorance is awesome!  cleanhippie   Feb-16-11 10:30 AM   #110 
        - Are you saying mine were illegal?  AtheistCrusader   Feb-20-11 07:48 PM   #125 
     - You mean "six slaughtered," surely?  Euromutt   Feb-15-11 09:13 PM   #98 
     - Math isn't your strong suit, is it?  AtheistCrusader   Feb-20-11 07:49 PM   #126 
  - Don't wait on Congress. ATF and the Executive should do the necessary.  sharesunited   Feb-15-11 12:32 PM   #3 
  - BATFE and Executive can't make laws  Porterhouse   Feb-15-11 12:47 PM   #4 
  - Someone actually killed a Fed with an "assault rifle " in December  Katya Mullethov   Feb-15-11 12:49 PM   #5 
  - I see nutzingk, I hear nutzingk..  X_Digger   Feb-15-11 12:52 PM   #7 
  - 2nd Amendment  Porterhouse   Feb-15-11 12:50 PM   #6 
  - wow  guitar man   Feb-15-11 12:53 PM   #8 
  - I said that yesterday and the (sarcastic) response I got was  shadowrider   Feb-15-11 12:59 PM   #12 
     - That I *have to read! Got a link?  friendly_iconoclast   Feb-15-11 01:02 PM   #16 
  - And ban the assault weapons themselves.  damntexdem   Feb-15-11 12:55 PM   #9 
  - And then ban shoulder things that go up, amirite?  friendly_iconoclast   Feb-15-11 12:59 PM   #11 
  - So tell me  Porterhouse   Feb-15-11 01:01 PM   #15 
  - I'll tell you a brilliant strategy... It worked in 94...  Glassunion   Feb-15-11 01:28 PM   #26 
     - You are absolutely right  Porterhouse   Feb-15-11 01:34 PM   #32 
  - If they are banned, and surrendered, would you be willing  oneshooter   Feb-15-11 01:13 PM   #23 
  - Please, what is your definition of an "assault weapon"?  PavePusher   Feb-16-11 01:14 AM   #106 
  - I found 19 loaded phrases and 1 huge omission in the article.  Glassunion   Feb-15-11 01:00 PM   #13 
  - The sad part  YllwFvr   Feb-15-11 01:13 PM   # 
  - Cops need to massacre?  kudzu22   Feb-15-11 01:05 PM   #18 
  - Yeah, that's an argument I've never understood either  Euromutt   Feb-15-11 09:30 PM   #99 
  - There are millions and millions of hi-cap and extended magazines ...  spin   Feb-15-11 01:08 PM   #19 
  - psst.. 'standard' capacity. Don't let them frame it on their irrational terms. n/t  X_Digger   Feb-15-11 01:13 PM   #22 
  - Good point. (n/t)  spin   Feb-15-11 01:39 PM   #36 
  - One year of amnesty - turn 'em in  jpak   Feb-15-11 01:31 PM   #29 
     - So of course, you would let violent criminals out of prison ...  spin   Feb-15-11 01:39 PM   #35 
     - No - all *law abiding* gun owners would turn them in you see  jpak   Feb-15-11 01:42 PM   #37 
        - In effect you would be creating criminals ...  spin   Feb-15-11 01:53 PM   #42 
        - No Obama would win - the majority of Americans support sensible gun laws that protect them  jpak   Feb-15-11 02:06 PM   #49 
           - A ban on hi-cap magazines has a small chance of passing ...  spin   Feb-15-11 03:06 PM   #74 
           - In the 2010 election the NRA won big.  GreenStormCloud   Feb-15-11 04:42 PM   #83 
           - BT - Before Tuscon  jpak   Feb-15-11 06:34 PM   #88 
              - Somebody died- BAN EVERYTHING  Brilliantrocket   Feb-16-11 01:07 PM   #111 
              - You realize there are post-Tuscon shooting polls that peg opposition to a ban  AtheistCrusader   Feb-20-11 07:52 PM   #127 
           - See results of poll attached to your article.  Hangingon   Feb-15-11 08:11 PM   #96 
        - Making a High capacity magazine  Riftaxe   Feb-15-11 02:35 PM   #65 
        - You mean that even he could make them? WOW!!! n/t  oneshooter   Feb-15-11 07:31 PM   #91 
        - So everything Bush did in office was, by your definition, legal?  DonP   Feb-15-11 05:03 PM   #85 
        - Not to mention it would be a 'taking' under the 5th amendment-- and would require compensation. n/t  X_Digger   Feb-15-11 05:14 PM   #86 
        - Bring the fines up to 40000 dollars and a lifetime felony. They'd be off the streets pronto. nt  right2bfree   Feb-20-11 07:25 PM   #124 
     - Maybe "law abiding", but not "Law abiding."  Callisto32   Feb-15-11 01:42 PM   #38 
     - Break the law - go to jail  jpak   Feb-15-11 01:46 PM   #39 
        - Grammar, it's fundamental.  Callisto32   Feb-15-11 02:16 PM   #53 
        - and pay a *BIG* fine to cover the cost of their incarceration  rl6214   Feb-15-11 03:10 PM   #76 
     - Quite the authoritarian aren't you?  Porterhouse   Feb-15-11 01:50 PM   #40 
     - Passing and enforcing gun laws is not authoritarian - law abiding mag owners have nothing to fear  jpak   Feb-15-11 01:57 PM   #44 
        - Once again  Porterhouse   Feb-15-11 02:08 PM   #51 
        - Really was the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act overturned by the SCOTUS?  jpak   Feb-15-11 02:17 PM   #55 
           - And as Bill Clinton said himself  Porterhouse   Feb-15-11 02:28 PM   #62 
           - Nope - it was the fact that Bill Clinton was elected president in the first place  jpak   Feb-15-11 02:53 PM   #69 
              - So your saying that Bill Clinton is lying  Porterhouse   Feb-15-11 03:02 PM   #71 
           - Con -stee - too- shunal  rl6214   Feb-15-11 03:12 PM   #77 
              - When they don't have any facts.. attack the opponent. n/t  X_Digger   Feb-15-11 03:38 PM   #81 
        - "If they have done nothing wrong, they have nothing to fear". Sounds familiar....  friendly_iconoclast   Feb-15-11 02:25 PM   #60 
     - Law abiding* gun owners would comply.  RSillsbee   Feb-15-11 01:53 PM   #43 
     - Jpak's head as Palin is sworn in  Porterhouse   Feb-15-11 01:59 PM   #46 
     - Your Palin fantasy is stupid and wrong - no one wants that gun idolater in the WH  jpak   Feb-15-11 02:01 PM   #48 
     - Nope  Porterhouse   Feb-15-11 02:12 PM   #52 
        - When the GOP Congress allowed the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act  jpak   Feb-15-11 02:20 PM   #57 
        - Dems helped it expire, and pro-gun/anti-AWB Dems helped turn the Senate blue.  benEzra   Feb-16-11 03:35 PM   #112 
        - Did Bill Clinton sign the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act of 1994?  jpak   Feb-15-11 02:22 PM   #58 
           - Yup  Porterhouse   Feb-15-11 02:26 PM   #61 
           - Wanna hear it from his own mouth? (well fingers..)  X_Digger   Feb-15-11 02:43 PM   #67 
              - But Clinton got reelected - Palin won't defeat Obama no matter what  jpak   Feb-15-11 02:57 PM   #70 
                 - Your just all over the map aren't you?  Porterhouse   Feb-15-11 03:05 PM   #73 
                 - Perhaps you'd like to review the subthread you've been posting in?  X_Digger   Feb-15-11 03:33 PM   #79 
     - IDK if you are a "Bones" fan  RSillsbee   Feb-15-11 02:31 PM   #63 
     - No, they wouldn't - gun extremists are in the minority and cannot wag the Dog of Liberty  jpak   Feb-15-11 01:59 PM   #47 
     - And the constitutional authority for that is....  kudzu22   Feb-15-11 01:59 PM   #45 
     - 9th and 10th Amendments - individual freedom from gun tyranny  jpak   Feb-15-11 02:08 PM   #50 
        - Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight  Porterhouse   Feb-15-11 02:16 PM   #54 
     - Lol! Now I'm convinced you're actually pro gun rights.  Union Scribe   Feb-15-11 11:41 PM   #102 
     - You sound like Barbara Boxer there  rl6214   Feb-16-11 12:10 AM   #103 
  - "on the campus of Virginia Tech in Blacksburg..."  here_is_to_hope   Feb-15-11 01:29 PM   #27 
  - You really aren't very good at this.  Callisto32   Feb-15-11 01:34 PM   #31 
  - LOL!  jpak   Feb-15-11 01:35 PM   #33 
  - Oh he is good at this  Porterhouse   Feb-15-11 01:51 PM   #41 
  - I should follow my own rules.  Callisto32   Feb-15-11 02:18 PM   #56 
     - Ever feed alka seltzers to a troll ?  Katya Mullethov   Feb-15-11 02:53 PM   #68 
        - I'd almost pay to see that....  Callisto32   Feb-15-11 03:26 PM   #78 
  - Call me crazy but I have a really strong impression there's some serious chain pulling going on here  mediator   Feb-15-11 03:40 PM   #82 
     - Indeed.  Callisto32   Feb-15-11 04:52 PM   #84 
        - I guess I should appreciate the mental discipline it must take to maintain the facade...  mediator   Feb-15-11 06:31 PM   #87 
           - Something like that.  Callisto32   Feb-16-11 06:23 AM   #107 
  - Question:  Atypical Liberal   Feb-15-11 03:34 PM   #80 
  - Because they are used for mass murder  jpak   Feb-15-11 06:37 PM   #89 
     - I thought you said  rl6214   Feb-15-11 07:34 PM   #92 
     - The Tuscon shooter was not law enforcement, the Ft. Hood shooter was not an MP  jpak   Feb-15-11 07:54 PM   #94 
        - Wow. You didn't just move the goal-posts on that one...  PavePusher   Feb-16-11 01:12 AM   #105 
           - Hard to move the goalposts when he is not even playing the same game.  cleanhippie   Feb-16-11 06:30 PM   #114 
              - Actually, I was thinking more of one of those games involving a bunch of tribal horsemen...  PavePusher   Feb-16-11 07:04 PM   #116 
                 - Ahhh, yes.  cleanhippie   Feb-16-11 07:09 PM   #117 
     - So what you are saying is...  Atypical Liberal   Feb-15-11 08:02 PM   #95 
     - So then our military shouldn't have them either?  krispos42   Feb-16-11 08:27 PM   #119 
  - "High Voulme" ammo clips  guitar man   Feb-15-11 07:04 PM   #90 
  - Read the article and voted.  Hangingon   Feb-15-11 07:51 PM   #93 
  - I damn near spewed coffee all over my keyboard when I saw that poll NT  RSillsbee   Feb-15-11 09:35 PM   #100 
  - 75% are against the ban  lawodevolution   Feb-15-11 09:52 PM   #101 
  - The conflation of "high capacity magazines" with magazines over 10 rounds  benEzra   Feb-16-11 12:27 AM   #104 
  - Large capacity clips are dangerous.  Remmah2   Feb-16-11 10:23 AM   #108 
  - 81% against banning magazines. You lose, you fail, again.  cleanhippie   Feb-16-11 06:32 PM   #115 
  - Overall homicide rates continue to decline  krispos42   Feb-16-11 08:25 PM   #118 
  - I wonder if Mayor Nutter's security detail consists of one guy with one ten-round mag  Euromutt   Feb-17-11 07:26 AM   #121 
  - I hope a reporter asks him point-blank why he thinks it's appropriate  benEzra   Feb-17-11 09:10 AM   #122 
  - Tragedy = Time to curtail the People's Rights.  Jmaxfie1   Feb-19-11 08:59 PM   #123 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC