Porterhouse
(131 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-15-11 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 4. BATFE and Executive can't make laws |
|
only the Congress can EPIC FAIL
|
| -Why Congress Should Ban High-Volume Ammo Clips |
jpak |
Feb-15-11 12:15 PM |
#0 |
-
"weapons of mass destruction" -- lol |
X_Digger |
Feb-15-11 12:22 PM |
#1 |
 -
"weapons of mass destruction"- yup |
jpak |
Feb-15-11 12:30 PM |
#2 |
  -
So Bush was right about Iraq, then? Lots of 30-round AK mags were found there. |
friendly_iconoclast |
Feb-15-11 01:04 PM |
#17 |
   -
Bush is an asshole - large cap mags suck |
jpak |
Feb-15-11 01:25 PM |
#24 |
  -
More like posts of mass ignorance. |
cleanhippie |
Feb-16-11 10:29 AM |
#109 |
  -
Thank you for conceding |
derby378 |
Feb-16-11 06:06 PM |
#113 |
 -
Is it also 19 slaughtered in Tucson, LOL? |
damntexdem |
Feb-15-11 12:56 PM |
#10 |
-
I laugh at the knee-jerk legislative wharrgarble that is divorced from reality. |
X_Digger |
Feb-15-11 01:01 PM |
#14 |
 -
"Divorce from reality" is to ignore mass murder in Tuscon wrought by high cap mags |
jpak |
Feb-15-11 01:27 PM |
#25 |
-
Well I guess I learned something new today |
Porterhouse |
Feb-15-11 01:31 PM |
#28 |
-
*stomp* *stomp* *stomp* -- woops, got some blood on your pantleg. n/t |
X_Digger |
Feb-15-11 01:34 PM |
#30 |
-
It's awesome when a person with such a motto calls others authoritarians. |
Callisto32 |
Feb-15-11 01:37 PM |
#34 |
-
To equate mass murder with high cap mags is a divorce from reality |
DissedByBush |
Feb-16-11 09:20 PM |
#120 |
-
Are you another Bush apologist, then? |
friendly_iconoclast |
Feb-15-11 01:08 PM |
#20 |
-
The magazines used in the shootings were legal |
YllwFvr |
Feb-15-11 01:09 PM |
#21 |
 -
No they weren't - they were limited to 10 rounds |
jpak |
Feb-15-11 02:24 PM |
#59 |
-
Yes they were legal |
Porterhouse |
Feb-15-11 02:33 PM |
#64 |
 -
Yes - it was a bad law in that respect - it should have banned them |
jpak |
Feb-15-11 03:03 PM |
#72 |
-
I actually agree with you |
Porterhouse |
Feb-15-11 03:08 PM |
#75 |
-
How do you get around the pesky Fifth amendment? |
one-eyed fat man |
Feb-15-11 08:34 PM |
#97 |
-
Derp derp derp. |
X_Digger |
Feb-15-11 02:37 PM |
#66 |
-
You have no idea what you are talking about. The way you display your ignorance is awesome! |
cleanhippie |
Feb-16-11 10:30 AM |
#110 |
-
Are you saying mine were illegal? |
AtheistCrusader |
Feb-20-11 07:48 PM |
#125 |
-
You mean "six slaughtered," surely? |
Euromutt |
Feb-15-11 09:13 PM |
#98 |
-
Math isn't your strong suit, is it? |
AtheistCrusader |
Feb-20-11 07:49 PM |
#126 |
-
Don't wait on Congress. ATF and the Executive should do the necessary. |
sharesunited |
Feb-15-11 12:32 PM |
#3 |
 -
BATFE and Executive can't make laws |
Porterhouse |
Feb-15-11 12:47 PM |
#4 |
-
Someone actually killed a Fed with an "assault rifle " in December |
Katya Mullethov |
Feb-15-11 12:49 PM |
#5 |
 -
I see nutzingk, I hear nutzingk.. |
X_Digger |
Feb-15-11 12:52 PM |
#7 |
-
2nd Amendment |
Porterhouse |
Feb-15-11 12:50 PM |
#6 |
-
wow |
guitar man |
Feb-15-11 12:53 PM |
#8 |
 -
I said that yesterday and the (sarcastic) response I got was |
shadowrider |
Feb-15-11 12:59 PM |
#12 |
-
That I *have to read! Got a link? |
friendly_iconoclast |
Feb-15-11 01:02 PM |
#16 |
-
And ban the assault weapons themselves. |
damntexdem |
Feb-15-11 12:55 PM |
#9 |
 -
And then ban shoulder things that go up, amirite? |
friendly_iconoclast |
Feb-15-11 12:59 PM |
#11 |
 -
So tell me |
Porterhouse |
Feb-15-11 01:01 PM |
#15 |
  -
I'll tell you a brilliant strategy... It worked in 94... |
Glassunion |
Feb-15-11 01:28 PM |
#26 |
 -
You are absolutely right |
Porterhouse |
Feb-15-11 01:34 PM |
#32 |
 -
If they are banned, and surrendered, would you be willing |
oneshooter |
Feb-15-11 01:13 PM |
#23 |
 -
Please, what is your definition of an "assault weapon"? |
PavePusher |
Feb-16-11 01:14 AM |
#106 |
-
I found 19 loaded phrases and 1 huge omission in the article. |
Glassunion |
Feb-15-11 01:00 PM |
#13 |
 -
The sad part |
YllwFvr |
Feb-15-11 01:13 PM |
# |
-
Cops need to massacre? |
kudzu22 |
Feb-15-11 01:05 PM |
#18 |
 -
Yeah, that's an argument I've never understood either |
Euromutt |
Feb-15-11 09:30 PM |
#99 |
-
There are millions and millions of hi-cap and extended magazines ... |
spin |
Feb-15-11 01:08 PM |
#19 |
 -
psst.. 'standard' capacity. Don't let them frame it on their irrational terms. n/t |
X_Digger |
Feb-15-11 01:13 PM |
#22 |
  -
Good point. (n/t) |
spin |
Feb-15-11 01:39 PM |
#36 |
 -
One year of amnesty - turn 'em in |
jpak |
Feb-15-11 01:31 PM |
#29 |
-
So of course, you would let violent criminals out of prison ... |
spin |
Feb-15-11 01:39 PM |
#35 |
 -
No - all *law abiding* gun owners would turn them in you see |
jpak |
Feb-15-11 01:42 PM |
#37 |
-
In effect you would be creating criminals ... |
spin |
Feb-15-11 01:53 PM |
#42 |
 -
No Obama would win - the majority of Americans support sensible gun laws that protect them |
jpak |
Feb-15-11 02:06 PM |
#49 |
-
A ban on hi-cap magazines has a small chance of passing ... |
spin |
Feb-15-11 03:06 PM |
#74 |
-
In the 2010 election the NRA won big. |
GreenStormCloud |
Feb-15-11 04:42 PM |
#83 |
 -
BT - Before Tuscon |
jpak |
Feb-15-11 06:34 PM |
#88 |
-
Somebody died- BAN EVERYTHING |
Brilliantrocket |
Feb-16-11 01:07 PM |
#111 |
-
You realize there are post-Tuscon shooting polls that peg opposition to a ban |
AtheistCrusader |
Feb-20-11 07:52 PM |
#127 |
-
See results of poll attached to your article. |
Hangingon |
Feb-15-11 08:11 PM |
#96 |
-
Making a High capacity magazine |
Riftaxe |
Feb-15-11 02:35 PM |
#65 |
 -
You mean that even he could make them? WOW!!! n/t |
oneshooter |
Feb-15-11 07:31 PM |
#91 |
-
So everything Bush did in office was, by your definition, legal? |
DonP |
Feb-15-11 05:03 PM |
#85 |
 -
Not to mention it would be a 'taking' under the 5th amendment-- and would require compensation. n/t |
X_Digger |
Feb-15-11 05:14 PM |
#86 |
-
Bring the fines up to 40000 dollars and a lifetime felony. They'd be off the streets pronto. nt |
right2bfree |
Feb-20-11 07:25 PM |
#124 |
-
Maybe "law abiding", but not "Law abiding." |
Callisto32 |
Feb-15-11 01:42 PM |
#38 |
 -
Break the law - go to jail |
jpak |
Feb-15-11 01:46 PM |
#39 |
-
Grammar, it's fundamental. |
Callisto32 |
Feb-15-11 02:16 PM |
#53 |
-
and pay a *BIG* fine to cover the cost of their incarceration |
rl6214 |
Feb-15-11 03:10 PM |
#76 |
-
Quite the authoritarian aren't you? |
Porterhouse |
Feb-15-11 01:50 PM |
#40 |
 -
Passing and enforcing gun laws is not authoritarian - law abiding mag owners have nothing to fear |
jpak |
Feb-15-11 01:57 PM |
#44 |
-
Once again |
Porterhouse |
Feb-15-11 02:08 PM |
#51 |
 -
Really was the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act overturned by the SCOTUS? |
jpak |
Feb-15-11 02:17 PM |
#55 |
-
And as Bill Clinton said himself |
Porterhouse |
Feb-15-11 02:28 PM |
#62 |
 -
Nope - it was the fact that Bill Clinton was elected president in the first place |
jpak |
Feb-15-11 02:53 PM |
#69 |
-
So your saying that Bill Clinton is lying |
Porterhouse |
Feb-15-11 03:02 PM |
#71 |
-
Con -stee - too- shunal |
rl6214 |
Feb-15-11 03:12 PM |
#77 |
-
When they don't have any facts.. attack the opponent. n/t |
X_Digger |
Feb-15-11 03:38 PM |
#81 |
-
"If they have done nothing wrong, they have nothing to fear". Sounds familiar.... |
friendly_iconoclast |
Feb-15-11 02:25 PM |
#60 |
-
Law abiding* gun owners would comply. |
RSillsbee |
Feb-15-11 01:53 PM |
#43 |
 -
Jpak's head as Palin is sworn in |
Porterhouse |
Feb-15-11 01:59 PM |
#46 |
  -
Your Palin fantasy is stupid and wrong - no one wants that gun idolater in the WH |
jpak |
Feb-15-11 02:01 PM |
#48 |
   -
Nope |
Porterhouse |
Feb-15-11 02:12 PM |
#52 |
  -
When the GOP Congress allowed the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act |
jpak |
Feb-15-11 02:20 PM |
#57 |
   -
Dems helped it expire, and pro-gun/anti-AWB Dems helped turn the Senate blue. |
benEzra |
Feb-16-11 03:35 PM |
#112 |
  -
Did Bill Clinton sign the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act of 1994? |
jpak |
Feb-15-11 02:22 PM |
#58 |
  -
Yup |
Porterhouse |
Feb-15-11 02:26 PM |
#61 |
  -
Wanna hear it from his own mouth? (well fingers..) |
X_Digger |
Feb-15-11 02:43 PM |
#67 |
  -
But Clinton got reelected - Palin won't defeat Obama no matter what |
jpak |
Feb-15-11 02:57 PM |
#70 |
  -
Your just all over the map aren't you? |
Porterhouse |
Feb-15-11 03:05 PM |
#73 |
  -
Perhaps you'd like to review the subthread you've been posting in? |
X_Digger |
Feb-15-11 03:33 PM |
#79 |
  -
IDK if you are a "Bones" fan |
RSillsbee |
Feb-15-11 02:31 PM |
#63 |
 -
No, they wouldn't - gun extremists are in the minority and cannot wag the Dog of Liberty |
jpak |
Feb-15-11 01:59 PM |
#47 |
-
And the constitutional authority for that is.... |
kudzu22 |
Feb-15-11 01:59 PM |
#45 |
 -
9th and 10th Amendments - individual freedom from gun tyranny |
jpak |
Feb-15-11 02:08 PM |
#50 |
-
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight |
Porterhouse |
Feb-15-11 02:16 PM |
#54 |
-
Lol! Now I'm convinced you're actually pro gun rights. |
Union Scribe |
Feb-15-11 11:41 PM |
#102 |
-
You sound like Barbara Boxer there |
rl6214 |
Feb-16-11 12:10 AM |
#103 |
-
"on the campus of Virginia Tech in Blacksburg..." |
here_is_to_hope |
Feb-15-11 01:29 PM |
#27 |
-
You really aren't very good at this. |
Callisto32 |
Feb-15-11 01:34 PM |
#31 |
 -
LOL! |
jpak |
Feb-15-11 01:35 PM |
#33 |
 -
Oh he is good at this |
Porterhouse |
Feb-15-11 01:51 PM |
#41 |
  -
I should follow my own rules. |
Callisto32 |
Feb-15-11 02:18 PM |
#56 |
 -
Ever feed alka seltzers to a troll ? |
Katya Mullethov |
Feb-15-11 02:53 PM |
#68 |
 -
I'd almost pay to see that.... |
Callisto32 |
Feb-15-11 03:26 PM |
#78 |
 -
Call me crazy but I have a really strong impression there's some serious chain pulling going on here |
mediator |
Feb-15-11 03:40 PM |
#82 |
-
Indeed. |
Callisto32 |
Feb-15-11 04:52 PM |
#84 |
-
I guess I should appreciate the mental discipline it must take to maintain the facade... |
mediator |
Feb-15-11 06:31 PM |
#87 |
-
Something like that. |
Callisto32 |
Feb-16-11 06:23 AM |
#107 |
-
Question: |
Atypical Liberal |
Feb-15-11 03:34 PM |
#80 |
 -
Because they are used for mass murder |
jpak |
Feb-15-11 06:37 PM |
#89 |
-
I thought you said |
rl6214 |
Feb-15-11 07:34 PM |
#92 |
 -
The Tuscon shooter was not law enforcement, the Ft. Hood shooter was not an MP |
jpak |
Feb-15-11 07:54 PM |
#94 |
-
Wow. You didn't just move the goal-posts on that one... |
PavePusher |
Feb-16-11 01:12 AM |
#105 |
-
Hard to move the goalposts when he is not even playing the same game. |
cleanhippie |
Feb-16-11 06:30 PM |
#114 |
-
Actually, I was thinking more of one of those games involving a bunch of tribal horsemen... |
PavePusher |
Feb-16-11 07:04 PM |
#116 |
-
Ahhh, yes. |
cleanhippie |
Feb-16-11 07:09 PM |
#117 |
-
So what you are saying is... |
Atypical Liberal |
Feb-15-11 08:02 PM |
#95 |
-
So then our military shouldn't have them either? |
krispos42 |
Feb-16-11 08:27 PM |
#119 |
-
"High Voulme" ammo clips |
guitar man |
Feb-15-11 07:04 PM |
#90 |
-
Read the article and voted. |
Hangingon |
Feb-15-11 07:51 PM |
#93 |
 -
I damn near spewed coffee all over my keyboard when I saw that poll NT |
RSillsbee |
Feb-15-11 09:35 PM |
#100 |
-
75% are against the ban |
lawodevolution |
Feb-15-11 09:52 PM |
#101 |
-
The conflation of "high capacity magazines" with magazines over 10 rounds |
benEzra |
Feb-16-11 12:27 AM |
#104 |
-
Large capacity clips are dangerous. |
Remmah2 |
Feb-16-11 10:23 AM |
#108 |
-
81% against banning magazines. You lose, you fail, again. |
cleanhippie |
Feb-16-11 06:32 PM |
#115 |
-
Overall homicide rates continue to decline |
krispos42 |
Feb-16-11 08:25 PM |
#118 |
-
I wonder if Mayor Nutter's security detail consists of one guy with one ten-round mag |
Euromutt |
Feb-17-11 07:26 AM |
#121 |
 -
I hope a reporter asks him point-blank why he thinks it's appropriate |
benEzra |
Feb-17-11 09:10 AM |
#122 |
-
Tragedy = Time to curtail the People's Rights. |
Jmaxfie1 |
Feb-19-11 08:59 PM |
#123 |