Reply #94: Why do you contradict yourselves all the time?

[PhillySane]

First you say they aren't military weapons, then you say they are ALL military weapons. Which is right? Look, I know that most guns were originally designed for military use. The gun YOU picture is a Ruger Mini-14, which is a distant cousin of the M-1 Garrand. As time progresses, these weapons have more capacity, lightness, portability etc. If you want, you can soup it up with a better barrel, trigger group, telescopic sights, laser sights, la-la-la. The point is, even the Mini-14 you show, is probably a better military weapon in some ways than the original M-1.

But, you don't need it to shoot deer. It's better for shooting people. And if you're crazy, you can take out a lot of unarmed people with it. That's my point.

And yes, if you're that determined, a Glock with a 30 round clip is a better choice. But you guys contradict yourselves there too. I can't really tell if you're for 30 round clips for Glocks or not?

Why is all of this so necessary for you to exercise your freedom? I've heard the term "ridiculously" low capacity clips used here. What about ridiculously high? Is that term in your vernacular? You can't accept that there might be too much of something?