Atypical Liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-11 02:44 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. "All it takes is one gun carrier to ignore the collective." |
|
This will be the argument used against you. That all it takes is one gun owner who doesn't consider the collective, and that is sufficient excuse to disarm all the ones who do.
|
| -Having a CCW and carrying a gun does NOT make me a "rugged individualist." |
GreenStormCloud |
Jan-27-11 02:40 PM |
#0 |
 -
Pleased to meet you. K&R |
patrice |
Jan-27-11 02:43 PM |
#1 |
| -
"All it takes is one gun carrier to ignore the collective." |
Atypical Liberal |
Jan-27-11 02:44 PM |
#2 |
  -
Some don't. They are often called "stret criminals". N/T |
GreenStormCloud |
Jan-27-11 03:02 PM |
#9 |
| -
Is this a parody of CCW people or are you serious? |
KansasVoter |
Jan-27-11 02:44 PM |
#3 |
| -
I have had a CHL for years. |
GreenStormCloud |
Jan-27-11 03:01 PM |
#7 |
| -
I moved it to spring. And for some reason that pissed off people here. |
KansasVoter |
Jan-27-11 03:01 PM |
#8 |
| -
No one was pissed off at you. Most thought pewhaps you had made it up, considering... |
cleanhippie |
Jan-28-11 10:16 AM |
#31 |
| -
"many progressives fear that when a person gets a gun for self-defense that they have abandoned ..." |
Kolesar |
Jan-27-11 02:45 PM |
#4 |
| -
The question might well be, "Can the group protect me in case I am attacked?" |
spin |
Jan-27-11 02:51 PM |
#5 |
| -
No, that not what OP GreenCloud said |
Kolesar |
Jan-27-11 03:03 PM |
#10 |
| -
"spin" was kind of close. |
GreenStormCloud |
Jan-27-11 09:19 PM |
#26 |
| -
You see it often in items written against guns. |
GreenStormCloud |
Jan-27-11 02:59 PM |
#6 |
| -
"the fear that guns are a gateway drug to becoming a conservative." |
Kolesar |
Jan-27-11 03:05 PM |
#11 |
| -
Spend enough time on this board and you'll see how pro-2A |
shadowrider |
Jan-27-11 03:33 PM |
#16 |
| -
gateway drug? |
Kolesar |
Jan-27-11 05:05 PM |
#20 |
| -
Owning a firearm is a very liberal and progressive idea ... |
spin |
Jan-27-11 03:10 PM |
#12 |
| -
When we have posters saying that an individual should rely on the police for protection.. |
X_Digger |
Jan-27-11 03:11 PM |
#13 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Jan-27-11 03:26 PM |
#14 |
| -
Here in NH... |
Tesha |
Jan-27-11 03:28 PM |
#15 |
| -
Your post brings two questions to mind: |
friendly_iconoclast |
Jan-27-11 09:31 PM |
#27 |
| -
that you have to ask... |
Tesha |
Jan-28-11 10:55 AM |
#33 |
| -
I was open carrying at one of Rep. Giffords events two years ago. |
PavePusher |
Jan-29-11 12:53 PM |
#36 |
| -
I don't understand your question n/t |
Tesha |
Jan-29-11 02:55 PM |
#37 |
| -
You wrote: |
PavePusher |
Jan-29-11 07:37 PM |
#39 |
| -
No, you misread NH |
Tesha |
Jan-30-11 11:45 AM |
#41 |
| -
And Dems have said worse, about other Dems. n/t |
oneshooter |
Jan-30-11 11:47 AM |
#42 |
| -
Its one thing |
Tesha |
Jan-30-11 11:55 AM |
#43 |
| -
I was born there (Hanover). |
PavePusher |
Jan-30-11 03:20 PM |
#44 |
| -
If all you knew was |
Tesha |
Jan-30-11 05:17 PM |
#46 |
| -
Yep, HB 0437 is stupid and mean, no argument there. |
PavePusher |
Jan-30-11 07:16 PM |
#47 |
| -
"So why do you think I want to keep some places gun free?" It's obvious. |
friendly_iconoclast |
Jan-29-11 05:14 PM |
#38 |
| -
now, why didn't I think of that? |
Tesha |
Jan-30-11 04:55 PM |
#45 |
| -
It is a non-problem. You are hand-wringing over nothing. |
GreenStormCloud |
Jan-28-11 03:44 AM |
#28 |
| -
gosh... thanks for your help n/t |
Tesha |
Jan-28-11 10:45 AM |
#32 |
| -
The individual is dead. Long live the collective. |
one-eyed fat man |
Jan-27-11 03:56 PM |
#17 |
| -
Me either |
guitar man |
Jan-27-11 03:57 PM |
#18 |
| -
Gee, someone who can embrace the laws about gun and gun owner |
flamin lib |
Jan-27-11 04:20 PM |
#19 |
| -
Not so rare here on DU, methinks. |
benEzra |
Jan-27-11 06:34 PM |
#21 |
| -
+1000 |
guitar man |
Jan-27-11 08:04 PM |
#23 |
| -
Too bad the dozen or so "outspoken" RKBA born-agains drown |
flamin lib |
Jan-27-11 08:39 PM |
#24 |
| -
Well, support for reasonable restrictions goes only as far as *reasonable* restrictions. |
benEzra |
Jan-28-11 12:04 PM |
#34 |
| -
the collective itself doesn't want to issue CCWs |
lawodevolution |
Jan-27-11 07:38 PM |
#22 |
| -
I am using "collective" in a sort of idealized sense. |
GreenStormCloud |
Jan-27-11 09:12 PM |
#25 |
| -
Hmmm. |
Callisto32 |
Jan-28-11 09:06 AM |
#29 |
| -
Well said. You just raised the bar here. |
rrneck |
Jan-28-11 10:04 AM |
#30 |
| -
Wish I could Rec this, but I'm late...thanks for the OP anyway!!! nt |
old mark |
Jan-29-11 12:40 PM |
#35 |
| -
Some folks have to be "rugged individualists"... |
beevul |
Jan-29-11 07:48 PM |
#40 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread