friendly_iconoclast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-28-11 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #65 |
| 81. Yeah, but his dad is a racist, so it was OK. |
|
Edited on Fri Jan-28-11 04:47 PM by friendly_iconoclast
Or so I've been told...
|
| -Kicking the hornets nest. |
beevul |
Jan-26-11 04:06 AM |
#0 |
 -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Jan-26-11 04:23 AM |
#1 |
| -
I am not against guns |
left is right |
Jan-26-11 05:00 AM |
#2 |
 -
"I’ll take my automatic with the 30-bullet clip" |
armueller2001 |
Jan-26-11 06:49 AM |
#4 |
| -
So, you braod-brush all gun owners with the anecdote of one foolish person. |
PavePusher |
Jan-26-11 10:07 AM |
#16 |
 -
when I carry |
YllwFvr |
Jan-26-11 10:15 AM |
#18 |
| -
Thankfully, of the millions who own guns, only a handful are foolhardy enough to |
Starboard Tack |
Jan-26-11 12:26 PM |
#28 |
| -
more than likely you are around them every day |
YllwFvr |
Jan-26-11 12:35 PM |
#29 |
| -
780,595 people in Florida have concealed weapons permits ... |
spin |
Jan-27-11 12:38 PM |
#46 |
| -
I am like you |
rl6214 |
Jan-26-11 01:02 PM |
#30 |
| -
I guess its not exactly inciting violence |
liberal N proud |
Jan-26-11 06:08 AM |
#3 |
| -
Yet decades of liberalized gun carry laws have NOT created the bloodbath you seem to expect. |
Callisto32 |
Jan-26-11 07:06 AM |
#6 |
| -
What I find amazing is there are no good fact to support that either way |
liberal N proud |
Jan-26-11 08:41 AM |
#7 |
| -
The BJS has some stats, as does the CDC.. |
X_Digger |
Jan-26-11 08:46 AM |
#9 |
| -
I don't see a dramatic drop in Aggravated assaults with firearms |
liberal N proud |
Jan-26-11 10:04 AM |
#15 |
| -
But you ignore the proliferation of firearms and liberalization of laws regarding their carry. |
Callisto32 |
Jan-26-11 11:23 AM |
#23 |
| -
Look up the different years, and compare for yourself. |
Callisto32 |
Jan-26-11 09:09 AM |
#11 |
| -
Baloney. The stats you claim don't exist have been posted here many times. n/t |
PavePusher |
Jan-26-11 10:08 AM |
#17 |
| -
Never said the didn't exist |
liberal N proud |
Jan-26-11 11:18 AM |
#21 |
| -
What you said: |
PavePusher |
Jan-26-11 11:53 AM |
#25 |
| -
What he means is |
shadowrider |
Jan-26-11 11:56 AM |
#26 |
| -
Your opinion isn't backed up by fact, however.. |
X_Digger |
Jan-26-11 08:43 AM |
#8 |
| -
X_Digger, |
Callisto32 |
Jan-26-11 09:10 AM |
#12 |
| -
for example, in 2007..0.261 % of crimes were by CHLs |
X_Digger |
Jan-26-11 11:44 AM |
#24 |
| -
That's what I thought you meant. |
Callisto32 |
Jan-26-11 12:25 PM |
#27 |
| -
your scenario? |
YllwFvr |
Jan-26-11 10:17 AM |
#19 |
| -
Why is it the anti's alwasy talk about the |
rl6214 |
Jan-26-11 01:05 PM |
#31 |
| -
I see it a bit different. |
lepus |
Jan-26-11 08:10 PM |
#35 |
| -
I think you might find out that |
safeinOhio |
Jan-26-11 06:58 AM |
#5 |
| -
One issue voter? |
HelenWheels |
Jan-26-11 08:57 AM |
#10 |
| -
You are right, I am a one issue voter. |
Callisto32 |
Jan-26-11 09:12 AM |
#13 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-26-11 09:39 AM |
#14 |
| -
"Potential killers." |
Callisto32 |
Jan-26-11 11:20 AM |
#22 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Jan-26-11 01:17 PM |
#32 |
| -
im anti NRA |
YllwFvr |
Jan-26-11 10:22 AM |
#20 |
| -
Broaden it up and then it's right. |
Francis Marion |
Jan-27-11 12:10 AM |
#41 |
| -
It amazes me that gun owners can threaten politicians so subtly and get away with it |
DainBramaged |
Jan-26-11 02:25 PM |
#33 |
| -
Retribution in the form of votes against you kind of goes with the territory for politicians |
slackmaster |
Jan-26-11 02:28 PM |
#34 |
| -
Yep, pro-gunners will add to their already large weapons cache when controls are considered. |
Hoyt |
Jan-26-11 11:38 PM |
#36 |
| -
What does that tell you about pro-gunners? |
beevul |
Jan-26-11 11:44 PM |
#37 |
| -
A slight demurrer. The trouble with that is..... |
friendly_iconoclast |
Jan-27-11 12:46 AM |
#42 |
| -
What does it tell me? |
Straw Man |
Jan-26-11 11:50 PM |
#38 |
| -
If it's to make a profit, consider getting into something not related to killing people. |
Hoyt |
Jan-26-11 11:57 PM |
#39 |
| -
Not related at all to killing people. |
Straw Man |
Jan-27-11 12:06 AM |
#40 |
| -
Randy Weaver |
RSillsbee |
Jan-27-11 05:01 AM |
#44 |
| -
Now pro-gunners are defending racist survivalists (Ayran Nation) who sold illegal weapons. |
Hoyt |
Jan-27-11 12:16 PM |
#45 |
| -
Is it wrong in your opinion to buy firearms and have a firearm collection ... |
spin |
Jan-27-11 12:49 PM |
#47 |
| -
Depends on what one plans to do with them and how stable the hoarder/collector is. |
Hoyt |
Jan-27-11 07:16 PM |
#51 |
| -
So to you a "collector" is the same as a "hoarder"? n/t |
oneshooter |
Jan-27-11 08:37 PM |
#53 |
| -
A stored or carried firearm (even loaded) does not pose anything like the danger of a bomb. |
PavePusher |
Jan-28-11 01:00 PM |
#68 |
| -
Now pro restrictionists are defending the killing |
RSillsbee |
Jan-27-11 01:37 PM |
#48 |
| -
Randy Weaver frequented Aryan Nation meetings and sold illegal weapons. Apparently OK with some here |
Hoyt |
Jan-27-11 07:12 PM |
#50 |
| -
Love the association fallacy.. did you come up with that yourself? |
X_Digger |
Jan-27-11 07:27 PM |
#52 |
| -
The Second Reich invented retirement at 65. Richard Nixon founded the EPA |
friendly_iconoclast |
Jan-27-11 08:56 PM |
#54 |
| -
Lets not forget what the Gun control act of '68 is modeled after...N/T |
beevul |
Jan-27-11 09:27 PM |
#55 |
| -
I don't see anyone disagreeing |
RSillsbee |
Jan-27-11 10:13 PM |
#56 |
| -
He had equal protection. If toters shoot someone, what legal protection do they have? |
Hoyt |
Jan-27-11 11:55 PM |
#57 |
| -
The guns he sold |
RSillsbee |
Jan-28-11 03:36 AM |
#58 |
| -
So you don't think we should infiltrate racist, terrorist organizations. Interesting. |
Hoyt |
Jan-28-11 08:09 AM |
#59 |
| -
I never said that |
RSillsbee |
Jan-28-11 08:56 AM |
#60 |
| -
I have no problem "deliberately setting up" terrorists, which Weaver clearly was. |
Hoyt |
Jan-28-11 10:13 AM |
#61 |
| -
Yep, that assault baby was clearly a threat to law enforcement... |
friendly_iconoclast |
Jan-28-11 11:16 AM |
#63 |
| -
"I have no problem "deliberately setting up" terrorists, which Weaver clearly was." |
PavePusher |
Jan-28-11 12:57 PM |
#66 |
| -
He wasn't set up out of the blue. He was set up because he was a terrorist. |
Hoyt |
Jan-28-11 01:55 PM |
#70 |
| -
SO attach 'terra' to anyone, and any means is justified by the ends? |
X_Digger |
Jan-28-11 02:02 PM |
#72 |
| -
What were his alledged crimes? Please, don't dodge. n/t |
PavePusher |
Jan-28-11 02:21 PM |
#73 |
| -
You know the old saying... |
beevul |
Jan-28-11 08:52 PM |
#91 |
| -
Do you really not understand? |
RSillsbee |
Jan-28-11 12:58 PM |
#67 |
| -
I understand that Weaver had well over a year to surrender, did not, and bad things happened. |
Hoyt |
Jan-28-11 01:53 PM |
#69 |
| -
Do you not understand |
RSillsbee |
Jan-28-11 02:46 PM |
#74 |
| -
So you have no problem with cops shooting women holding children. Interesting. |
friendly_iconoclast |
Jan-28-11 11:18 AM |
#64 |
| -
Daddy Weaver should have given himself up. Instead HE put his wife in danger. |
Hoyt |
Jan-28-11 01:59 PM |
#71 |
| -
Strangely enoiugh, thats the argument the feds made in court. |
beevul |
Jan-28-11 02:54 PM |
#75 |
| -
Don't you know civil liberties only extend to people who's politics are acceptable |
RSillsbee |
Jan-28-11 03:23 PM |
#76 |
| -
Which is exactly what they did the next time. Oops. n/t |
PavePusher |
Jan-28-11 04:11 PM |
#77 |
| -
That was different |
RSillsbee |
Jan-28-11 04:22 PM |
#78 |
| -
I forget... were there any minorities at Waco? |
PavePusher |
Jan-28-11 05:41 PM |
#87 |
| -
Worse |
RSillsbee |
Jan-28-11 08:45 PM |
#89 |
| -
ROFL. N/T |
beevul |
Jan-28-11 08:49 PM |
#90 |
| -
Apparently, flying Confederate flags means it's OK for law enforcement to shoot you |
friendly_iconoclast |
Jan-28-11 04:43 PM |
#80 |
| -
But they don't have the right to transfer illegal weapons and run from trial for over a year. |
Hoyt |
Jan-28-11 05:24 PM |
#84 |
| -
Once again, your ignorance is on display. |
beevul |
Jan-28-11 05:39 PM |
#86 |
| -
Back to the Weavers, you have still not answered the question: |
PavePusher |
Jan-28-11 05:43 PM |
#88 |
| -
Why am I not surprised you followed this closely? Did you contribute to his defense fund? |
Hoyt |
Jan-28-11 05:18 PM |
#83 |
| -
It is clear you didn't. |
beevul |
Jan-28-11 05:28 PM |
#85 |
| -
That argument worked so well for the Feds, they ended up paying $3M to the Weaver family.... |
friendly_iconoclast |
Jan-28-11 04:39 PM |
#79 |
| -
I guess his wife and son were just collateral damage, eh? |
friendly_iconoclast |
Jan-28-11 11:14 AM |
#62 |
| -
Wasn'r his son the one that got shot in the back? NT |
RSillsbee |
Jan-28-11 12:46 PM |
#65 |
| -
Yeah, but his dad is a racist, so it was OK. |
friendly_iconoclast |
Jan-28-11 04:46 PM |
#81 |
| -
Amazing how that works. |
shadowrider |
Jan-28-11 04:49 PM |
#82 |
| -
False accusation of association. |
GreenStormCloud |
Jan-27-11 02:11 PM |
#49 |
| -
The same thing it tells me about pot-smokers... |
mvccd1000 |
Jan-27-11 12:51 AM |
#43 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread