You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #6: I'm putting them all on ignore, one by one. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I'm putting them all on ignore, one by one.
I don't care what they have to say any more. They're all irrational.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Amen Rachel. tridim  Jan-11-11 08:13 PM   #0 
  - Re-setting Cheney's vote to NOT ban plastic, un-detectable guns!  bullwinkle428   Jan-11-11 08:14 PM   #1 
  - Undetectable plastic guns have never been manufactured or sold in the US  slackmaster   Jan-11-11 08:21 PM   #14 
  - Where do they come up with this insane shit? A plastic gun. ROFL  Statistical   Jan-11-11 08:34 PM   #25 
  - I think it's rooted in the fact that there are guns, like Glocks, that have polymer frames  slackmaster   Jan-11-11 08:36 PM   #29 
  - Not to mention those pesky things called barrels  shedevil69taz   Jan-11-11 09:04 PM   #34 
     - Do you know that we have plastics now that are stronger than titanium?  tridim   Jan-12-11 10:02 AM   #41 
        - Stronger isn't the issue.  Statistical   Jan-12-11 12:28 PM   #53 
        - We don't have any plastics that are suitable for making a barrel for a repeating firearm  slackmaster   Apr-05-11 05:50 PM   #67 
        - Plastics harder than copper, that withstand 1000+ degrees and 35,000-60,000 psi *at the same time*,  benEzra   Apr-06-11 08:11 AM   #79 
        - Assuming  gejohnston   Apr-08-11 07:28 PM   #80 
  - "In the Line of Fire," I suspect  Euromutt   Apr-06-11 06:42 AM   #77 
     - It was made of wood NT  RSillsbee   Apr-08-11 09:11 PM   #81 
     - I saw the movie a couple of weeks ago on cable  krispos42   Apr-09-11 12:20 AM   #96 
        - He was sitting by the lake whittling the damn thing  RSillsbee   Apr-09-11 05:47 AM   #98 
     - Die Hard 2 was the original source, IIRC.  AtheistCrusader   Apr-08-11 11:46 PM   #84 
  - then if they don't exist, you should have no problem banning them  CreekDog   Jan-12-11 11:56 AM   #51 
     - Govt authority to ban things doesn't work that way.  Statistical   Jan-12-11 12:28 PM   #54 
        - so if they existed you would support banning them?  CreekDog   Jan-12-11 04:28 PM   #55 
           - In fact...  Straw Man   Jan-12-11 04:42 PM   #56 
              - you are, but not the person I asked  CreekDog   Jan-12-11 05:02 PM   #57 
                 - Too bad you didn't know they were already illegal, huh?  AtheistCrusader   Apr-08-11 11:47 PM   #85 
  - And ban those super-duper photon cannons!  X_Digger   Jan-11-11 08:35 PM   #26 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-11-11 08:14 PM   #2 
  - I'm putting them all on ignore, one by one.  tridim   Jan-11-11 08:15 PM   #6 
  - oh come on, give it a shot (pun intended)  Skittles   Jan-11-11 08:18 PM   #9 
  - What you mean is, you don't want to have your beliefs corrected by facts.  TheWraith   Jan-11-11 08:22 PM   #20 
  - "6.I'm putting them all on ignore, one by one. "  lawodevolution   Jan-12-11 10:06 AM   #43 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-11-11 08:22 PM   #19 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-12-11 10:10 AM   #45 
  - I love how she used the Gipper (Reagan) as examples of gun control legislation  justiceischeap   Jan-11-11 08:15 PM   #3 
  - Have no fear  malaise   Jan-11-11 08:18 PM   #10 
     - Not only deliberate but smart  justiceischeap   Jan-11-11 08:21 PM   #17 
  - 'xept that if this man  nadinbrzezinski   Jan-11-11 08:15 PM   #4 
  - "We do live in a sick culture."  DeSwiss   Jan-11-11 08:16 PM   #7 
  - I think it's our job as humans to heal our sick culture.  tridim   Jan-11-11 08:18 PM   #11 
  - Or at least to try to heal our sick culture.  DeSwiss   Jan-11-11 08:33 PM   #23 
  - "And more guns is not the answer. Not even close."  lawodevolution   Jan-12-11 10:22 AM   #48 
  - That is sad and a good reason to control guns. Are gun-obsessed arming up to shoot 220 Million who  Hoyt   Apr-05-11 03:55 PM   #60 
     - Are the anti-gun obssed infringing on the constitutional rights  rl6214   Apr-05-11 04:00 PM   #61 
  - Says you.  AtheistCrusader   Apr-08-11 11:53 PM   #87 
     - You have stated the attitude of 99.9%  DWC   Apr-21-11 09:19 AM   #102 
  - Why is it that policy makers  nadinbrzezinski   Jan-11-11 08:27 PM   #22 
     - If I had to sum it up.....  DeSwiss   Jan-11-11 08:35 PM   #27 
        - I guess my perspective is formed  nadinbrzezinski   Jan-11-11 08:52 PM   #31 
           - So your solution would be gun control? How's the gun ban working out in Nigeria, Mexico, Jamaica,  lawodevolution   Jan-12-11 10:26 AM   #49 
           - And the 60,000+ people the US Department of Justice cites as using firearms lawfully  AtheistCrusader   Apr-08-11 11:55 PM   #88 
  - "we do live in a sick culture," in which angry bigoted people,who don't understand the culture and  lawodevolution   Jan-12-11 10:19 AM   #47 
  - Had nothing to do with gun shows.  AtheistCrusader   Apr-08-11 11:50 PM   #86 
  - A brilliant opening segment  malaise   Jan-11-11 08:15 PM   #5 
  - Too bad that's not true  slackmaster   Jan-11-11 08:17 PM   #8 
  - "Our side needs to tone down the rhetoric" ,,, oh puhleez!  upi402   Jan-11-11 08:19 PM   #12 
  - Oh Goody. Here Comes Another "Hate Rachel" Thread In The Guns Forum (n/t)  Paladin   Jan-11-11 08:21 PM   #13 
  - oh, you are late, darlin'  Skittles   Jan-11-11 08:22 PM   #18 
  - I love Rachel.  AtheistCrusader   Apr-08-11 11:56 PM   #89 
  - I'm loving the Chris Rock replay. One of my favs. nt  Ilsa   Jan-11-11 08:21 PM   #15 
  - beat me to it...  Volaris   Jan-11-11 08:21 PM   #16 
  - She debates her opponents brilliantly with words, not rhetorical brainwashing. nt  Ilsa   Jan-11-11 08:23 PM   #21 
  - Apparently she's debating her opponents with lies  DissedByBush   Jan-11-11 09:12 PM   #35 
  - Too bad ideas are what matter.  Callisto32   Apr-05-11 05:22 PM   #64 
  - She'd be better off with actual facts.  PavePusher   Apr-05-11 06:07 PM   #69 
  - Explain that to Cho. n/t  Statistical   Jan-11-11 08:34 PM   #24 
  - 'cept if he'd carried a second gun.  X_Digger   Jan-11-11 08:36 PM   #28 
  - Apparently you don't get it.  tridim   Jan-11-11 08:45 PM   #30 
  - google New York Reload..  X_Digger   Jan-11-11 08:53 PM   #32 
  - I swear, if they pass a ban, I'm going to buy a second 1911...  PavePusher   Jan-11-11 09:47 PM   #38 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-12-11 10:00 AM   #40 
     - How do I contact the "Department of Need" to ask their permission  shadowrider   Jan-12-11 10:07 AM   #44 
     - Target practice and home defense.  X_Digger   Jan-12-11 11:55 AM   #50 
     - Just because you don't know or agree with my reasons  PavePusher   Jan-12-11 12:18 PM   #52 
     - You don't need anything other than the few minor requirements to sustain life.  Callisto32   Apr-05-11 05:24 PM   #65 
     - wow if you hate the 20 rounder  timo   Apr-05-11 10:57 PM   #74 
     - Nice dodge. OH SHIT A FACT, better attack the messenger.  AtheistCrusader   Apr-08-11 11:58 PM   #90 
     - Why would anyone bother with a 20 round extended?  burrfoot   Apr-09-11 04:49 AM   #97 
  - Two words: Patrick Sherrill  Euromutt   Apr-06-11 06:38 AM   #76 
  - The panic mongers prefer moral posturing. And as you see, they get quite hostile...  friendly_iconoclast   Jan-11-11 08:54 PM   #33 
  - Complete, and utter  Rincewind   Jan-11-11 09:34 PM   #36 
  - "She gets it."  PavePusher   Jan-11-11 09:41 PM   #37 
  - Garbage thread full of bigotry and hate. KKK and neo NAZIs also feel that  lawodevolution   Jan-11-11 09:51 PM   #39 
  - Too bad it is not true. nt  hack89   Jan-12-11 10:05 AM   #42 
  - We just don't know that to be true.  aikoaiko   Jan-12-11 10:16 AM   #46 
  - So true. Rachel does get it. nt  onehandle   Apr-05-11 03:07 PM   #58 
  - No she doesn't. High capacity mags were legal back then too.  GreenStormCloud   Apr-05-11 03:23 PM   #59 
  - She knows that. I heard her say it once on her show.  krispos42   Apr-08-11 11:38 PM   #83 
     - If she acknowledges they were legal to buy during the ban  AtheistCrusader   Apr-09-11 12:01 AM   #91 
        - Um...  krispos42   Apr-09-11 12:02 AM   #92 
           - I want to rage at you...  AtheistCrusader   Apr-09-11 12:04 AM   #94 
              - Thanks!  krispos42   Apr-09-11 12:18 AM   #95 
  - Not even close  rl6214   Apr-05-11 04:03 PM   #62 
  - You are so right, onehandle.  onehandle   Apr-05-11 07:41 PM   #70 
  - Talking to yourself again?  Straw Man   Apr-05-11 10:30 PM   #73 
  - You're scaring me.  rrneck   Apr-05-11 11:14 PM   #75 
  - Rachel is absolutely clueless on this issue  DissedByBush   Apr-05-11 08:07 PM   #72 
  - Wait, did you seriously necro this thread?  AtheistCrusader   Apr-09-11 12:03 AM   #93 
  - Objection, Your Honor....  Callisto32   Apr-05-11 05:12 PM   #63 
  - BTW, it was Congress that declined to renew the failed, expired "AW" ban  slackmaster   Apr-05-11 05:48 PM   #66 
  - Over-10-round magazines were *NEVER* illegal. Read the law.  benEzra   Apr-05-11 06:04 PM   #68 
  - Rachel does not get it.  Remmah2   Apr-06-11 07:34 AM   #78 
  - She gets it all right.  rrneck   Apr-05-11 08:01 PM   #71 
  - Yeah, he would have.  krispos42   Apr-08-11 11:37 PM   #82 
  - Good reason to monitor what folks acquire . At some point, mental illness has to be considered.  Hoyt   Apr-20-11 07:39 PM   #100 
  - I'm glad this thread got revived. It shows that lies & distortions no longer dictate new gun laws  aikoaiko   Apr-09-11 07:52 AM   #99 
  - Most of us agree with the "Fuck NRA" and "Fuck GOP" part.  Logical   Apr-20-11 07:54 PM   #101 
  - True, Logical!  David West   Apr-22-11 04:25 AM   #104 
  - Link please?  Atypical Liberal   Apr-21-11 09:40 AM   #103 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC