Edweird
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-11 05:38 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. Those diabolical Austrians and their polymers! |
|
Edited on Sat Jan-08-11 05:52 PM by Edweird
|
| -Congresswoman Giffords and other victims were shot with 9MM Glock! |
Harry Hope |
Jan-08-11 05:32 PM |
#0 |
-
Well, at this point, I don't think the caliber and make of the weapon is very important. |
ret5hd |
Jan-08-11 05:34 PM |
#1 |
 -
It is, actually, and she's lucky. |
Cassandra |
Jan-08-11 06:46 PM |
#21 |
-
Do you actually think that a brand name designates caliber? |
ret5hd |
Jan-08-11 07:01 PM |
#23 |
 -
I told my friend that it was a glock... |
Cassandra |
Jan-08-11 07:13 PM |
#24 |
-
My question stands. |
ret5hd |
Jan-08-11 07:15 PM |
#25 |
-
9mm is 9mm, regardless of brand. |
benEzra |
Jan-08-11 07:16 PM |
#27 |
-
That's rather an urban legend. |
TheWraith |
Jan-08-11 08:08 PM |
#35 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-08-11 09:53 PM |
#53 |
-
Sure, if you go out of your way |
AtheistCrusader |
Jan-08-11 11:48 PM |
#57 |
 -
Also hollow point bullets makes a big difference in tissue damage. |
Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel |
Jan-09-11 09:13 AM |
#59 |
-
You need special cold-loaded sub-sonic .223 ammo to make it silent. |
TheWraith |
Jan-09-11 06:37 PM |
#60 |
-
goddamn, let's play 'count the untrue gun canards'. |
AtheistCrusader |
Jan-08-11 08:31 PM |
#39 |
-
The friend who told me that... |
Cassandra |
Jan-08-11 09:41 PM |
#52 |
-
I'm guessing 'no' to both questions. |
AtheistCrusader |
Jan-08-11 11:45 PM |
#56 |
-
wtf???? would a Smith & Wesson have been better? wtf? |
GSLevel9 |
Jan-08-11 05:35 PM |
#2 |
-
Can you explain the significance of this? (nt) |
enough |
Jan-08-11 05:36 PM |
#3 |
 -
exactly... why the exclamation point as to type of gun? |
hlthe2b |
Jan-08-11 05:36 PM |
#4 |
-
I was wondering how 17 people were injured with a handgun |
justiceischeap |
Jan-08-11 05:37 PM |
#5 |
 -
Reloading a semi auto handgun takes 3 seconds. How does that make the "popo" look bad? |
Edweird |
Jan-08-11 05:39 PM |
#7 |
  -
3 seconds would be quite slow, actually. (n/t) |
benEzra |
Jan-08-11 07:18 PM |
#28 |
  -
With practice you can swap magazines far faster than 3 seconds. (n/t) |
spin |
Jan-08-11 07:52 PM |
#34 |
  -
3 seconds? Try maybe half a second |
DissedByBush |
Jan-08-11 11:10 PM |
#55 |
 -
I'm thinking 'random crazy guy' not world class USPSA competitor. |
Edweird |
Jan-09-11 12:14 AM |
#58 |
 -
He had an extended clip, according to witnesses. Did not reload. nt |
RaleighNCDUer |
Jan-08-11 05:40 PM |
#8 |
 -
Magazines for 33 rounds are readily available... |
rfranklin |
Jan-08-11 05:40 PM |
#9 |
 -
The richochet factor. |
Sonoman |
Jan-08-11 05:43 PM |
#11 |
 -
do you understand the meaning of "shotting fish in a barrell"? |
TorchTheWitch |
Jan-08-11 06:07 PM |
#17 |
 -
Could have been a brace of LeMats |
Katya Mullethov |
Jan-08-11 06:07 PM |
#18 |
 -
There were no police there, no armed guards, and apparently no armed civilians. |
TheWraith |
Jan-08-11 08:12 PM |
#36 |
 -
As far as I can tell... |
PavePusher |
Jan-08-11 09:06 PM |
#45 |
 -
according to one witness |
one-eyed fat man |
Jan-08-11 09:08 PM |
#46 |
-
Those diabolical Austrians and their polymers! |
Edweird |
Jan-08-11 05:38 PM |
#6 |
-
Better question. How did he get it or did someone |
Cleita |
Jan-08-11 05:41 PM |
#10 |
 -
Your point is well taken |
Harry Hope |
Jan-08-11 05:49 PM |
#15 |
-
Oh, I think this is extraordinarily important! |
CTyankee |
Jan-08-11 05:43 PM |
#12 |
 -
What is the "significant point"? (n/t) |
benEzra |
Jan-08-11 07:23 PM |
#30 |
  -
that he had a weapon with significant ammunition ability.... |
CTyankee |
Jan-08-11 08:24 PM |
#38 |
 -
That doesn't have anything to do with it being a Glock, though. |
benEzra |
Jan-08-11 08:46 PM |
#41 |
 -
Did the job, didn't it? |
CTyankee |
Jan-08-11 08:49 PM |
#43 |
 -
My point is just that this was an ordinary civilian pistol, not some out-of-the-mainstream racegun. |
benEzra |
Jan-08-11 09:14 PM |
#47 |
 -
Hey, ok, ok...I know it's really important to have a fast reload by a top notch |
CTyankee |
Jan-08-11 09:19 PM |
#48 |
 -
Sorry, don't mean to overwhelm... |
benEzra |
Jan-08-11 09:22 PM |
#50 |
 -
yeah, well, heh, heh. have another drink....we're cool... |
CTyankee |
Jan-08-11 09:24 PM |
#51 |
 -
The 'extended ability' can be made by hand for a few cents in most people's garages. |
AtheistCrusader |
Jan-08-11 08:36 PM |
#40 |
-
The sidearm of choice of (or assignment to) most police officers. |
Pancho Sanza |
Jan-08-11 05:44 PM |
#13 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-08-11 05:47 PM |
#14 |
 -
I wouldn't flatter myself so if I were you Harry |
The Midway Rebel |
Jan-08-11 05:59 PM |
#16 |
 -
because it's about as significant as what shoes he was wearing n/t |
TorchTheWitch |
Jan-08-11 06:09 PM |
#19 |
 -
No, just inane attempts to use a tragedy as an excuse to push a pet prohibition. |
benEzra |
Jan-08-11 07:28 PM |
#31 |
-
And his use of a Glock instead of a Ruger or a S&W is significant because...why? |
benEzra |
Jan-08-11 06:43 PM |
#20 |
-
I love the cheesy manner in which you implicate the NRA |
jazzhound |
Jan-08-11 06:51 PM |
#22 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-08-11 07:15 PM |
#26 |
 -
Are you denouncing my sexuality ? |
Katya Mullethov |
Jan-08-11 07:37 PM |
#32 |
-
FWIW, that's a Glock 17 on the top right, not a G19. They're similar, but the G19 is smaller. |
benEzra |
Jan-08-11 07:22 PM |
#29 |
-
Congresswoman Giffords and other victims were shot with 9MM Glock! |
jazzhound |
Jan-08-11 07:48 PM |
#33 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-08-11 08:23 PM |
#37 |
 -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Jan-08-11 09:22 PM |
#49 |
-
Why did you post a FN 5.7, and the wrong glock, anyway? |
AtheistCrusader |
Jan-08-11 08:46 PM |
#42 |
-
So. What. What is your point? n/t |
PavePusher |
Jan-08-11 09:03 PM |
#44 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-08-11 09:59 PM |
#54 |