X_Digger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-10 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 27. Not in your lifetime :) n/t |
| -Justices Rule That 2nd Amendment Also Governs State and Local Gun Laws |
BridgeTheGap |
Jun-28-10 09:44 AM |
#0 |
 -
Republican ruled court shoves guns down the throats of cities that don't want them. |
Walk away |
Jun-28-10 10:16 AM |
#1 |
 -
Yeah cities should have the power to violate Constitutional rights. |
Statistical |
Jun-28-10 10:21 AM |
#2 |
| -
Oh goody, another states rights fan. |
DonP |
Jun-28-10 10:30 AM |
#3 |
| -
Yeah, those Civil Rights are so last century... |
PavePusher |
Jun-28-10 10:34 AM |
#5 |
| -
So, you prefer downtown Chicago to Montpelier or Minneapolis/St. Paul? |
benEzra |
Jun-28-10 10:43 AM |
#8 |
| -
Yeah, rights and choices suck, huh? |
proteus_lives |
Jun-28-10 11:10 AM |
#12 |
| -
Were you opposed to Lawrence v. Texas, as well? |
friendly_iconoclast |
Jun-28-10 11:21 AM |
#13 |
| -
"Cities" don't have a say in the matter |
slackmaster |
Jun-28-10 11:23 AM |
#14 |
| -
Have you thought of joining your nieces? You should. n/t |
TPaine7 |
Jun-28-10 12:02 PM |
#18 |
| -
The criminal element of Chicago seems to have no problem getting guns |
Travis Coates |
Jun-28-10 12:51 PM |
#23 |
| -
Are you aware that Europe has much higher violent crime rates... |
GreenStormCloud |
Jun-28-10 01:00 PM |
#24 |
 -
Just like it shoved Civil Rights down the throats of cities that don't want them. |
gorfle |
Jun-29-10 05:18 PM |
#67 |
| -
I cannot find a scrutiny level in the ruling. Is there one? |
Bold Lib |
Jun-28-10 10:30 AM |
#4 |
| -
Its not in there, but you can forget about a rational basis standard |
Pullo |
Jun-28-10 10:37 AM |
#6 |
| -
In reading it seems to set the groundwork for Strict scrutiny without saying it. This part . . . |
Bold Lib |
Jun-28-10 10:41 AM |
#7 |
| -
Interesting |
Pullo |
Jun-28-10 10:55 AM |
#10 |
| -
Strict scrutiny I guess |
DissedByBush |
Jun-28-10 06:40 PM |
#28 |
| -
intermediate scrutiny. |
Statistical |
Jun-29-10 12:30 PM |
#49 |
| -
We'll get a more liberal Supreme Court pretty soon. |
Major Hogwash |
Jun-28-10 10:53 AM |
#9 |
| -
they said the same thing about Roe V Wade |
bossy22 |
Jun-28-10 11:02 AM |
#11 |
| -
Did you get your J.D. degree out of a box of Corn Flakes? |
Major Hogwash |
Jun-28-10 07:47 PM |
#30 |
| -
Over 70% of the U.S. electorate views the 2ndA as protecting an individual right. |
benEzra |
Jun-29-10 10:11 AM |
#44 |
| -
What did I say about a 5-4 Supreme Court? |
Major Hogwash |
Jun-29-10 04:11 PM |
#58 |
| -
I don't. You don't. But Otis McDonald does... |
benEzra |
Jun-29-10 04:30 PM |
#62 |
| -
And that's why the NRA shoehorned their way into this case, huh? |
Major Hogwash |
Jun-29-10 04:33 PM |
#64 |
| -
"The other 70%". |
Statistical |
Jun-29-10 12:32 PM |
#51 |
| -
Unfortunately, so is "Slaughterhouse" |
Euromutt |
Jun-28-10 08:03 PM |
#34 |
| -
So choices and rights are "douchebag decisions" to you? |
proteus_lives |
Jun-28-10 11:31 AM |
#16 |
| -
So what is the 9th amendment? |
Major Hogwash |
Jun-28-10 07:53 PM |
#32 |
| -
So if I live in the tri-state area of NYC, I should have fewer rights ... |
spin |
Jun-28-10 11:54 PM |
#41 |
| -
Speaking of which, |
HockeyMom |
Jun-29-10 10:00 AM |
#43 |
| -
24% own guns in Florida |
HockeyMom |
Jun-29-10 10:15 AM |
#45 |
| -
Much depends on where you live ... |
spin |
Jun-29-10 12:31 PM |
#50 |
| -
Comparing the violence level of different areas or cities ... |
spin |
Jun-29-10 12:22 PM |
#47 |
| -
The point I was really trying to make |
HockeyMom |
Jun-29-10 01:04 PM |
#53 |
| -
Wyoming is basically a rural state ... |
spin |
Jun-29-10 01:53 PM |
#55 |
| -
This isn't about hunting really |
HockeyMom |
Jun-29-10 02:07 PM |
#56 |
| -
I was trying to explain the difference in firearm ownership ... |
spin |
Jun-29-10 02:23 PM |
#57 |
| -
A gun is no guarantee of safety. |
gorfle |
Jun-29-10 05:29 PM |
#69 |
| -
Not in your lifetime :) n/t |
X_Digger |
Jun-28-10 02:20 PM |
#27 |
| -
Oh, sure. It's easy. Only need 1 conservative to replace, and that won't even take 4 more years. |
Major Hogwash |
Jun-28-10 07:43 PM |
#29 |
| -
Is that the same 70%.. |
X_Digger |
Jun-28-10 07:51 PM |
#31 |
| -
Don't be offended, we're talking about guns, weapons, firearms. Things that kill people. |
Major Hogwash |
Jun-28-10 07:57 PM |
#33 |
| -
Should cities also be able to ban gay marriage? Abortions? |
X_Digger |
Jun-28-10 08:48 PM |
#35 |
| -
So, what's your take on Loving v. Virginia? |
friendly_iconoclast |
Jun-28-10 08:53 PM |
#36 |
| -
Hrmm.. no response to either of our questions.. |
X_Digger |
Jun-28-10 11:15 PM |
#39 |
| -
You're the little train that can't quite pull it up the hill. I believe in mixed-race marriages. |
Major Hogwash |
Jun-29-10 04:24 PM |
#60 |
| -
900 new handgun owners in DC would disagree. |
X_Digger |
Jun-29-10 04:44 PM |
#66 |
| -
I doubt you'll get a direct answer, but thanks for trying. |
friendly_iconoclast |
Jun-29-10 07:24 PM |
#72 |
| -
That's hilarious. |
Major Hogwash |
Jun-30-10 06:54 AM |
#74 |
| -
So, you're comparing mixed-race marriages to owning guns??!!!! |
Major Hogwash |
Jun-29-10 12:18 PM |
#46 |
| -
You misidentified the troll. Of course the right to arms is more fundamental than the right to marry |
TPaine7 |
Jun-29-10 12:29 PM |
#48 |
| -
That's what lead to shotgun weddings. Hahahahahaha!!!!!! |
Major Hogwash |
Jun-29-10 04:17 PM |
#59 |
| -
"gawd given right" |
gorfle |
Jun-29-10 05:37 PM |
#70 |
| -
"They take guns away from psychos and felons" |
TPaine7 |
Jun-29-10 06:23 PM |
#71 |
| -
I am , it's just like the Texas GOP wanting to override Lawrence v. Texas |
friendly_iconoclast |
Jun-29-10 01:35 PM |
#54 |
| -
Ummm... |
Recursion |
Jun-29-10 12:36 PM |
#52 |
| -
Hmmm..... |
Major Hogwash |
Jun-29-10 04:27 PM |
#61 |
| -
Nothing much will change. |
one-eyed fat man |
Jun-30-10 09:40 AM |
#75 |
| -
Fairy tales can come true |
cowman |
Jun-28-10 10:47 PM |
#38 |
| -
Check out these polls... |
spin |
Jun-29-10 12:08 AM |
#42 |
| -
"If you did succeed in getting more liberal judges appointed to the court" |
Major Hogwash |
Jun-29-10 04:30 PM |
#63 |
| -
Never underestimate your opponent ... |
spin |
Jun-29-10 05:22 PM |
#68 |
| -
Yeah, but you're quoting from REPUBLICANS. |
Major Hogwash |
Jun-30-10 06:48 AM |
#73 |
| -
Pretty soon? |
cowman |
Jun-28-10 09:46 PM |
#37 |
| -
Chances are that the Supreme Court will not take up another case ... |
spin |
Jun-28-10 11:47 PM |
#40 |
| -
You sound like a broken record now. That's the same response the last time. |
Major Hogwash |
Jun-29-10 04:35 PM |
#65 |
| -
So can I take my gun into Disney World now? That's when the fun really starts. |
Kablooie |
Jun-28-10 11:24 AM |
#15 |
| -
You probably should read the decision before making such statements and assumptions. |
Bold Lib |
Jun-28-10 11:58 AM |
#17 |
| -
Yes, ... if Disney World is in your home in Chicago you certainly can! |
DonP |
Jun-28-10 12:03 PM |
#19 |
| -
Yes. I decided to make a condescending snarky comment out of sheer ignorance. |
Kablooie |
Jun-28-10 12:19 PM |
#20 |
| -
"How did you know?" Because you show a propensity to do just that. |
Bold Lib |
Jun-28-10 12:25 PM |
#21 |
| -
It's not the first time you've done that, and I doubt that it will be the last time |
slackmaster |
Jun-28-10 01:17 PM |
#26 |
| -
Disney land is private property. |
Statistical |
Jun-28-10 12:45 PM |
#22 |
| -
If you don't know anything about the subject, why do you start by making ridiculous assumptions? |
AtheistCrusader |
Jun-28-10 01:07 PM |
#25 |
| -
Try taking one in and I'll watch the "fun" start with you. nt |
SteveM |
Jun-30-10 10:03 AM |
#76 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread