PavePusher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-19-10 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
|
almost as much fun as Ivory-Crystal.
|
| -My answer to the gun show "loophole" |
tburnsten |
Apr-19-10 05:20 PM |
#0 |
-
Good idea.. |
virginia mountainman |
Apr-19-10 05:28 PM |
#1 |
 -
Fred Meyer here sells .38 specials in pink and lavendar. i asked |
roguevalley |
Apr-19-10 11:24 PM |
#58 |
-
You will still need the NICS check. |
PavePusher |
Apr-20-10 11:07 AM |
#67 |
-
He probably didn't bother explaining the 4473 and NICS check |
tburnsten |
Apr-20-10 11:16 AM |
#69 |
-
That is what you need to bring to the store, yes |
Euromutt |
Apr-20-10 07:50 PM |
#82 |
-
I can hear it now... |
DAMANgoldberg |
Apr-19-10 05:30 PM |
#2 |
 -
So far none of the gun owners on DU have an issue with that approach |
tburnsten |
Apr-19-10 05:52 PM |
#10 |
 -
Or just make the system open to the public and free of charge. n/t |
PavePusher |
Apr-19-10 10:26 PM |
#46 |
  -
Free ? |
Katya Mullethov |
Apr-20-10 09:07 PM |
#87 |
 -
Free would be bad. |
ManiacJoe |
Apr-20-10 11:56 PM |
#99 |
 -
What the OP proposes is more sweeping than a "gun show loophole closure"... |
SteveM |
Apr-22-10 10:15 AM |
#133 |
-
A gun show is simply a breeding ground for the next Timothy McVeigh. |
onehandle |
Apr-19-10 05:35 PM |
#3 |
 -
I shouldn't be surprised that you completely missed the point |
tburnsten |
Apr-19-10 05:44 PM |
#6 |
  -
Nothing wrong with a mandatory, inexpensive registered transfer |
safeinOhio |
Apr-19-10 06:32 PM |
#17 |
 -
I'm not aware of that issue having ever been taken up by the courts |
tburnsten |
Apr-19-10 06:38 PM |
#18 |
 -
Filling out a 4473 isn't "registration". |
jeepnstein |
Apr-20-10 08:40 AM |
#61 |
 -
SO we should ban gun shows, guns, or Diesel Fuel and Fertilizer. |
Pavulon |
Apr-19-10 05:45 PM |
#8 |
 -
P.S. |
tburnsten |
Apr-19-10 05:53 PM |
#12 |
 -
Your bigotry seems to be "open carry". n/t |
PavePusher |
Apr-19-10 10:27 PM |
#47 |
  -
Tell it like it is, Rosa Parks! nt |
onehandle |
Apr-20-10 08:41 AM |
#62 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Apr-20-10 07:53 AM |
#60 |
  -
Gun ownership is a Constitutionally protected right |
tburnsten |
Apr-20-10 09:51 AM |
#63 |
   -
Well, maybe it's time to change the Constitution |
h9socialist |
Apr-20-10 12:37 PM |
#75 |
  -
Well ownership of weapons has historically |
tburnsten |
Apr-20-10 12:43 PM |
#77 |
  -
Yeah, good luck with that. |
proteus_lives |
Apr-21-10 12:35 AM |
#103 |
  -
Any thirteen states can block a Constitutional amendment. |
GreenStormCloud |
Apr-22-10 10:31 AM |
#136 |
  -
What would be wrong with a left-wing insurrection, if needed? |
PavePusher |
Apr-20-10 11:09 AM |
#68 |
 -
Not 3rd Grade . . . just accurate . . . |
h9socialist |
Apr-20-10 12:32 PM |
#74 |
 -
Gandhi did not proscribe ownership or use of firearms in self-defense. n/t |
PavePusher |
Apr-20-10 05:53 PM |
#79 |
  -
Which was the point I was trying to make . . . |
h9socialist |
Apr-21-10 07:38 AM |
#108 |
 -
Oops, my bad. Sorry for the misunderstanding. n/t |
PavePusher |
Apr-21-10 07:01 PM |
#110 |
 -
No problem . . . |
h9socialist |
Apr-22-10 02:53 PM |
#148 |
 -
Wow, you should read Gandhi more closely... |
SteveM |
Apr-22-10 10:28 AM |
#135 |
 -
It is important to understand |
Katya Mullethov |
Apr-21-10 12:16 AM |
#102 |
 -
And how many people have visited gun shows in the intervening 15 years? |
Euromutt |
Apr-21-10 07:36 AM |
#107 |
 -
The meteorologist has spoken with... mixed wildlife metaphors? nt |
SteveM |
Apr-22-10 10:20 AM |
#134 |
-
Anyone can buy a gun at a gun show without a background check. That's called a loophole. |
baldguy |
Apr-19-10 05:36 PM |
#4 |
 -
One day of the month people sell guns at shows |
hack89 |
Apr-19-10 05:41 PM |
#5 |
 -
Then they can sell it at the Dennys parking lot across the street from the gunshow. |
Statistical |
Apr-19-10 05:44 PM |
#7 |
 -
What if you are an active duty military member who is suddenly mobilized? |
tburnsten |
Apr-19-10 05:48 PM |
#9 |
 -
False as to fact |
ProgressiveProfessor |
Apr-19-10 06:51 PM |
#22 |
 -
There is no loophole. |
ManiacJoe |
Apr-19-10 09:13 PM |
#42 |
 -
It is not a loophole. |
PavePusher |
Apr-19-10 10:29 PM |
#49 |
 -
You're just adjusting the existing reporting/licensing requirement. |
AtheistCrusader |
Apr-20-10 10:33 AM |
#64 |
 -
I love how "complying with the law" has become a "loophole." |
Callisto32 |
Apr-20-10 10:55 AM |
#65 |
 -
A loophole is generally accidental. |
NewMoonTherian |
Apr-20-10 06:57 PM |
#81 |
 -
Correction... |
SteveM |
Apr-22-10 10:35 AM |
#137 |
-
Apparently I can't rec my own threads |
tburnsten |
Apr-19-10 05:53 PM |
#11 |
 -
No, but I can and did rec it. I wonder who is un-recommending this thread... |
spin |
Apr-19-10 06:05 PM |
#14 |
-
Why on Earth would anyone have a problem with this approach? |
tburnsten |
Apr-19-10 06:15 PM |
#16 |
-
Some who post here talk about "sensible" gun control law ... |
spin |
Apr-19-10 06:45 PM |
#19 |
-
Lately they've given up on subtlety |
tburnsten |
Apr-19-10 06:49 PM |
#20 |
-
Sometimes when I come here, I just shake my head in disbelief... |
spin |
Apr-19-10 06:54 PM |
#24 |
 -
Still at zero recs |
tburnsten |
Apr-19-10 06:57 PM |
#25 |
-
Give it 24 hours ... |
spin |
Apr-19-10 07:01 PM |
#26 |
-
I just figured out how to do the recommend thingy...was reading in General Posts earlier some scary |
Mother Smuckers |
Apr-19-10 07:05 PM |
#27 |
-
Damnit man, I can only rec once! |
PavePusher |
Apr-19-10 10:34 PM |
#51 |
-
You wouldn't be referring to this former DU member would you? |
Hoopla Phil |
Apr-19-10 08:38 PM |
#38 |
 -
Nope, not this time |
tburnsten |
Apr-19-10 08:44 PM |
#40 |
-
Smurfette... |
PavePusher |
Apr-19-10 10:32 PM |
#50 |
-
Ahh, another old hand |
tburnsten |
Apr-19-10 10:46 PM |
#54 |
-
Yeah...I don't think it was much of an attempt communication, actually. |
Callisto32 |
Apr-20-10 11:03 AM |
#66 |
-
You have nailed her I see |
tburnsten |
Apr-20-10 11:21 AM |
#70 |
-
My current approach to selling firearms ... |
spin |
Apr-19-10 06:04 PM |
#13 |
 -
The idea has come up before here, I am positive it did not originate with me |
tburnsten |
Apr-19-10 06:12 PM |
#15 |
  -
In some states, you have to display a special license tag ... |
spin |
Apr-19-10 06:52 PM |
#23 |
 -
A problem with private access to the database |
DissedByBush |
Apr-19-10 07:06 PM |
#28 |
  -
But doesn't the database only contain names of those who have already forfeited some part of |
Mother Smuckers |
Apr-19-10 07:11 PM |
#30 |
   -
If it were totally open |
DissedByBush |
Apr-19-10 07:55 PM |
#35 |
  -
A personal appearance at a ffl dealer |
pipoman |
Apr-19-10 08:13 PM |
#36 |
  -
There are a few states, Texas is one |
oneshooter |
Apr-19-10 07:23 PM |
#32 |
 -
Interesting. I didn't know that. (n/t) |
spin |
Apr-19-10 10:41 PM |
#53 |
 -
I just don't sell guns to anyone. |
one-eyed fat man |
Apr-22-10 12:26 PM |
#147 |
-
There is opposition to your excellent suggestion from those who do not really want a simple solution |
Mother Smuckers |
Apr-19-10 06:50 PM |
#21 |
 -
The opposition I have seen here and elsewhere |
pipoman |
Apr-19-10 08:19 PM |
#37 |
 -
Or want only one particular response to the "problem" |
Euromutt |
Apr-20-10 06:14 PM |
#80 |
-
Yes Yes |
jaksavage |
Apr-19-10 07:07 PM |
#29 |
 -
No, no, no! We need separate boxes for those and more for |
Mother Smuckers |
Apr-19-10 07:13 PM |
#31 |
-
Have the public schools gotten so bad |
ManiacJoe |
Apr-19-10 09:19 PM |
#44 |
-
K & R |
GreenStormCloud |
Apr-19-10 07:37 PM |
#33 |
-
The answer to the problem is simple |
pipoman |
Apr-19-10 07:44 PM |
#34 |
-
Unrec |
katandmoon |
Apr-19-10 08:42 PM |
#39 |
 -
For what reason? |
tburnsten |
Apr-19-10 08:47 PM |
#41 |
 -
Oh. You again... n/t |
PavePusher |
Apr-19-10 10:39 PM |
#52 |
-
k&r n/t |
appal_jack |
Apr-19-10 09:16 PM |
#43 |
-
LOL! Yeah. Gunbaggers would love having their driver's licenses 'marked.' |
onehandle |
Apr-19-10 09:30 PM |
#45 |
 -
So do you have a solution to the problem? (n/t) |
spin |
Apr-19-10 10:29 PM |
#48 |
  -
What's funny is that |
tburnsten |
Apr-19-10 10:52 PM |
#56 |
 -
What does this even mean? |
tburnsten |
Apr-19-10 10:47 PM |
#55 |
  -
She was fun to debate ... |
spin |
Apr-19-10 11:24 PM |
#57 |
  -
"What does this post mean?" |
jazzhound |
Apr-20-10 02:02 AM |
#59 |
 -
Solution: Mark everyone's |
gorfle |
Apr-20-10 12:04 PM |
#71 |
 -
aaand there's the second poster confirming that some do not *want* a solution. |
friendly_iconoclast |
Apr-20-10 12:28 PM |
#73 |
 -
You know there's a digital mark in State Patrol DB's showing drivers with CPL's right? |
AtheistCrusader |
Apr-20-10 03:35 PM |
#78 |
-
My opinion on this system. |
gorfle |
Apr-20-10 12:13 PM |
#72 |
 -
Only change I'd make is telephone instead of visiting an FFL/PD. n/t |
X_Digger |
Apr-20-10 12:42 PM |
#76 |
  -
Can't see it. |
gorfle |
Apr-20-10 08:50 PM |
#84 |
 -
My problem with visiting an FFL/PD is that.. |
X_Digger |
Apr-20-10 09:05 PM |
#86 |
 -
I don't trust the government not to keep it. |
gorfle |
Apr-20-10 09:09 PM |
#88 |
 -
Now you're talking. (Post office / dmv) |
X_Digger |
Apr-20-10 09:25 PM |
#90 |
 -
A post office is a federal office |
pipoman |
Apr-20-10 10:00 PM |
#91 |
 -
My rural post office was also a general store. :) |
X_Digger |
Apr-20-10 10:05 PM |
#92 |
  -
I suppose there are |
pipoman |
Apr-20-10 10:26 PM |
#93 |
 -
DMV is pretty accessible in the states I've lived in. |
X_Digger |
Apr-20-10 10:30 PM |
#94 |
 -
Why not just use NICS? |
pipoman |
Apr-20-10 10:43 PM |
#95 |
 -
No need to go to a third party. |
ManiacJoe |
Apr-21-10 12:00 AM |
#100 |
  -
You just made a federal firearms registry. |
gorfle |
Apr-21-10 09:03 PM |
#113 |
 -
Gun data is not included in the NICS check. Buyer data only. |
ManiacJoe |
Apr-22-10 01:18 AM |
#127 |
 -
Incorrect. |
gorfle |
Apr-22-10 10:56 AM |
#141 |
 -
Form 4473 is not NICS. |
ManiacJoe |
Apr-22-10 08:29 PM |
#155 |
 -
Err.. not sure about that.. |
X_Digger |
Apr-22-10 08:34 PM |
#156 |
 -
No one is proposing getting rid of NICS. |
gorfle |
Apr-21-10 09:03 PM |
#112 |
 -
I'm still not seeing the utility |
pipoman |
Apr-21-10 10:36 PM |
#119 |
 -
Well that's becasue the idea is to not restrict private sales |
tburnsten |
Apr-21-10 11:34 PM |
#121 |
  -
You don't have places which sell guns in your area? |
pipoman |
Apr-21-10 11:42 PM |
#123 |
 -
Yes, there are reasonably priced FFLs in my region |
tburnsten |
Apr-22-10 12:49 AM |
#125 |
 -
That has always been part of the solution IMO, |
pipoman |
Apr-22-10 06:41 AM |
#128 |
 -
Sometimes I forget what it's like to have a real conversation on the intarwebz |
tburnsten |
Apr-22-10 06:56 AM |
#129 |
 -
I do believe we agree that this issue |
pipoman |
Apr-22-10 07:43 AM |
#132 |
 -
Thanks. I feel the same as well. Good discussion. nt |
SteveM |
Apr-22-10 10:54 AM |
#140 |
 -
WHAT EXPENSE!?!? |
gorfle |
Apr-22-10 10:53 AM |
#139 |
 -
There isn't a federal registry now |
pipoman |
Apr-22-10 08:21 PM |
#153 |
 -
Another thing. |
gorfle |
Apr-21-10 09:04 PM |
#114 |
 -
So then, |
pipoman |
Apr-22-10 07:32 AM |
#131 |
 -
Criminal records are already a matter of public record. |
gorfle |
Apr-22-10 11:02 AM |
#142 |
 -
A matter of public record if you |
pipoman |
Apr-22-10 08:16 PM |
#152 |
 -
It's trivial to look up. |
gorfle |
Apr-23-10 04:54 PM |
#157 |
 -
I simply can't figure out why we need to |
pipoman |
Apr-20-10 08:06 PM |
#83 |
-
What's hard about it? |
gorfle |
Apr-20-10 08:52 PM |
#85 |
-
There is no federal registry |
pipoman |
Apr-20-10 09:15 PM |
#89 |
-
One downside to FOID cards and DL markers is |
ManiacJoe |
Apr-20-10 11:55 PM |
#97 |
 -
I get what you're saying |
tburnsten |
Apr-21-10 12:02 AM |
#101 |
  -
Do you see the unnecessary cost and |
pipoman |
Apr-21-10 07:06 AM |
#105 |
 -
Again, no one is proposing eliminating NICS. |
gorfle |
Apr-21-10 09:18 PM |
#116 |
 -
I am only going to bother with the last question now. |
pipoman |
Apr-21-10 11:54 PM |
#124 |
 -
Well, with additional funding and assistance from |
tburnsten |
Apr-22-10 12:54 AM |
#126 |
  -
And I am saying that the question will be 'why?' |
pipoman |
Apr-22-10 07:14 AM |
#130 |
 -
Why. |
gorfle |
Apr-22-10 11:41 AM |
#145 |
 -
Again we disagree on this aspect of this debate, we likely agree on more than we disagree |
pipoman |
Apr-22-10 08:12 PM |
#151 |
 -
This is not hard. |
gorfle |
Apr-22-10 11:22 AM |
#144 |
 -
This isn't about the records |
pipoman |
Apr-22-10 08:28 PM |
#154 |
 -
I don't think so. |
gorfle |
Apr-23-10 04:59 PM |
#158 |
 -
No, |
pipoman |
Apr-23-10 07:14 PM |
#159 |
 -
Well, they do have an electronic version of NICS |
X_Digger |
Apr-23-10 07:26 PM |
#160 |
 -
I really don't know exactly how NICS works |
pipoman |
Apr-24-10 06:46 AM |
#161 |
 -
How could you be surprised? |
gorfle |
Apr-24-10 01:20 PM |
#162 |
 -
Well, I'm pretty sure my conversations about the |
pipoman |
Apr-24-10 04:46 PM |
#163 |
 -
I agree |
pipoman |
Apr-21-10 06:41 AM |
#104 |
 -
Not a problem. |
gorfle |
Apr-21-10 09:06 PM |
#115 |
-
No, assets are not automatically seized nor should they be. |
pipoman |
Apr-21-10 11:35 PM |
#122 |
-
If you can no longer own firearms. |
gorfle |
Apr-22-10 11:19 AM |
#143 |
-
I do not believe the records are purged. |
gorfle |
Apr-21-10 09:01 PM |
#111 |
-
Whew!! Let's catch our breath... |
pipoman |
Apr-21-10 11:26 PM |
#120 |
-
Responses. |
gorfle |
Apr-22-10 10:49 AM |
#138 |
-
You and I will have to agree to disagree |
pipoman |
Apr-22-10 08:04 PM |
#150 |
-
Perhaps a yellow star or a pink triangle? NNTO |
Travis Coates |
Apr-20-10 11:35 PM |
#96 |
 -
Well that's the whole idea behind having a universal marking |
tburnsten |
Apr-20-10 11:56 PM |
#98 |
-
But instead |
pipoman |
Apr-21-10 07:13 AM |
#106 |
-
This is why you encrypt the scarlet letter. |
gorfle |
Apr-21-10 09:21 PM |
#117 |
-
Many have correctly pointed out problems with stigmatizing peoples' ID cards with negative info |
slackmaster |
Apr-21-10 10:27 AM |
#109 |
 -
There is no problem if the information is encrypted. |
gorfle |
Apr-21-10 09:22 PM |
#118 |
-
I had an idea where one corner of a DL was marked... |
krispos42 |
Apr-22-10 11:45 AM |
#146 |
-
Yep, and because of that |
pipoman |
Apr-22-10 07:56 PM |
#149 |