You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #37: What can we learn from this? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
rrneck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #27
37. What can we learn from this?
You're not learning much apparently, since you keep trotting out that bullshit. They don't mint Morgan silver dollars any more, but they didn't stop printing money.

Of course, you may be onto something there. Money assumes the potential for greed, greed emboldens crime. So if we stop making currency, then crime will stop because there won't be any money to steal. Yeah, that's the ticket.

Don't you get tired of talking to yourself?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Gun bans and workplace violence - (Ohio State target rich environment) shadowrider  Mar-12-10 07:59 AM   #0 
  - Gun bans in conjunction with bans on retail sales of new guns and ammo.  sharesunited   Mar-12-10 09:07 AM   #1 
  - Like weed and coke, right? That one sure works.. not. n/t  X_Digger   Mar-12-10 09:09 AM   #2 
  - The kiddie porn crusade seems to be working pretty well.  sharesunited   Mar-12-10 09:14 AM   #3 
  - Ignorance again..  X_Digger   Mar-12-10 09:19 AM   #6 
     - Police are armed, shooters know it, yet they even shoot at police...  rfranklin   Mar-12-10 09:23 AM   #9 
        - The police were specifically targeted because  armueller2001   Mar-12-10 09:37 AM   #10 
        - Did you intend to respond to someone else?  X_Digger   Mar-12-10 10:06 AM   #17 
        - I don't recall  shadowrider   Mar-12-10 10:08 AM   #19 
        - That was four cops.  GreenStormCloud   Mar-12-10 11:53 AM   #36 
        - So, if firearms can't help to protect people in one instance..  PavePusher   Mar-12-10 01:39 PM   #47 
  - I wonder what Shares feels about drug prohibition? Maybe he'll answer you.  SteveM   Mar-12-10 09:19 AM   #5 
     - Drugs are consumed. Bullets are imposed. Big difference.  sharesunited   Mar-12-10 09:43 AM   #12 
        - So you support drug "prohibition" as well. Please note your own words...  SteveM   Mar-12-10 09:51 AM   #14 
        - That is clearly untrue. You can walk into a retail store and buy guns and ammo.  sharesunited   Mar-12-10 10:01 AM   #16 
           - Do you really know what is going on in our regime of prohibition?  SteveM   Mar-12-10 10:24 AM   #21 
              - You're wrong. The difficulty of obtaining crack created the ingenuity of home meth labs.  sharesunited   Mar-12-10 10:39 AM   #24 
                 - No, that won't fly...  SteveM   Mar-12-10 10:50 AM   #28 
                 - What recreational drugs could you go out and score within an hour?  sharesunited   Mar-12-10 11:08 AM   #32 
                    - Most all, but I use pot. I have. Yes. Yes.  SteveM   Mar-12-10 11:28 AM   #34 
                    - What a limited life you have, apparently..  X_Digger   Mar-12-10 12:13 PM   #41 
                    - Do you perceive any risk of arrest by doing so?  sharesunited   Mar-12-10 12:16 PM   #42 
                       - miniscule amount, and it depends on the substance / volume  X_Digger   Mar-12-10 12:30 PM   #44 
                          - Including risk from a sting? Cops posing as sellers?  sharesunited   Mar-12-10 12:36 PM   #45 
                             - rare occurence  X_Digger   Mar-12-10 12:56 PM   #46 
                    - In Tucson? Anything you care to name. n/t  PavePusher   Mar-12-10 01:41 PM   #48 
                 - Sheesh.  rrneck   Mar-12-10 12:03 PM   #39 
                    - Simple yet quite profound...  Glassunion   Mar-13-10 12:08 AM   #87 
        - So,  rrneck   Mar-12-10 12:07 PM   #40 
  - Which does nothing but make us more defense less.  ProgressiveProfessor   Mar-12-10 09:17 AM   #4 
  - For a professor you seem to lack debating skills...  rfranklin   Mar-12-10 09:19 AM   #7 
  - SU is a one trick pony...many are tired of his nonsense...  ProgressiveProfessor   Mar-12-10 09:42 AM   #11 
     - How is it any more simplistic than always saying More Guns Good?  sharesunited   Mar-12-10 09:46 AM   #13 
        - Your flawed approach would make the weak and defenseless subject to the violent  ProgressiveProfessor   Mar-12-10 10:00 AM   #15 
        - Your approach simply makes your students more likely to get shot.  sharesunited   Mar-12-10 10:08 AM   #18 
           - Oh jeez  shadowrider   Mar-12-10 10:12 AM   #20 
           - Do you remember this story?  sharesunited   Mar-12-10 10:25 AM   #22 
              - The correct answer is that the man who shot them should not have had a gun.  shadowrider   Mar-12-10 10:31 AM   #23 
              - Halt the retail sale of all new guns and ammo. Immediately turn what's out there into collectibles.  sharesunited   Mar-12-10 10:46 AM   #27 
                 - Immediately turn what's out there into collectibles.  shadowrider   Mar-12-10 10:54 AM   #29 
                 - It's not clear who has a dimmer view of the public.  sharesunited   Mar-12-10 10:58 AM   #30 
                    - Yes it is...your pollyanna views endanger the rest of us...take your solipsism and...  ProgressiveProfessor   Mar-12-10 11:00 AM   #31 
                    - In other words: Carry On Dying Y'all!  sharesunited   Mar-12-10 11:26 AM   #33 
                       - We are too busy carrying on living.  GreenStormCloud   Mar-12-10 12:03 PM   #38 
                    - "unfit"  PavePusher   Mar-12-10 01:51 PM   #52 
                       - A free society does not mean a free fire zone.  sharesunited   Mar-12-10 05:15 PM   #61 
                          - Specious - There is no evidence that lawful personal ownership of weapons results in free fire zones  ProgressiveProfessor   Mar-12-10 05:52 PM   #66 
                             - I will amend only to say free fire zones in the eyes of a shooter who decides to open fire.  sharesunited   Mar-12-10 06:25 PM   #68 
                                - Since a true free fire zone would be illegal, then legal usage would be fine by you?  ProgressiveProfessor   Mar-12-10 06:57 PM   #72 
                                   - No. My idea of a free fire zone is one  sharesunited   Mar-12-10 07:15 PM   #73 
                                   - I see, you are back to your solipsism where you can make things up to be what you want  ProgressiveProfessor   Mar-12-10 08:02 PM   #76 
                                   - Me? No I will take a finder of fact's word for it. But a shooter is making their decision  sharesunited   Mar-12-10 09:00 PM   #85 
                 - What can we learn from this?  rrneck   Mar-12-10 11:56 AM   #37 
                 - hmmm, if your idea were workable  one-eyed fat man   Mar-12-10 03:55 PM   #58 
              - Consider the home invasion scenario  ProgressiveProfessor   Mar-12-10 10:40 AM   #25 
              - Nah... actually if I may venture a guess  armueller2001   Mar-12-10 11:44 AM   #35 
                 - How does their choice to be armed change the story?  sharesunited   Mar-12-10 12:21 PM   #43 
           - Well, except for the inconvenient fact that the DOJ/FBI shows that...  PavePusher   Mar-12-10 01:48 PM   #51 
              - i have an anecdote  paulsby   Mar-12-10 02:07 PM   #54 
        - I don't think anyone is saying that as an absolutism.  PavePusher   Mar-12-10 01:46 PM   #49 
           - iow, that's while correlation does not imply causation  paulsby   Mar-12-10 01:59 PM   #53 
  - An exaggerated "need" for which the "cure" is worse for us than the disease.  sharesunited   Mar-12-10 09:22 AM   #8 
     - Go visit the next gay bashing victim from your community in the hospital and try to tell him/her  ProgressiveProfessor   Mar-12-10 10:42 AM   #26 
  - Self delete  spin   Mar-12-10 01:47 PM   #50 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-12-10 03:09 PM   #55 
     - Goons, now thats not very nice...  ProgressiveProfessor   Mar-12-10 03:15 PM   #56 
     - But the law FEELS good! Only a meanie would point out problems with it.  friendly_iconoclast   Mar-12-10 04:16 PM   #59 
     - Its not about feeling good. Its about protecting people by limiting weapons to those needed for ...  cabluedem   Mar-12-10 05:06 PM   #60 
        - The U.S. does not have a Department of Need Determination.  GreenStormCloud   Mar-12-10 05:36 PM   #62 
        - It has never been about hunting...  ProgressiveProfessor   Mar-12-10 05:51 PM   #65 
        - I havent said a word about sniper guns, Those DC snipers were using an assault rifle to kill people  cabluedem   Mar-12-10 06:27 PM   #69 
           - Keep talking, you make yourself look sillier every time :)  X_Digger   Mar-12-10 06:38 PM   #70 
           - You have never proven that these assault rifles are CA legal.  cabluedem   Mar-12-10 07:52 PM   #75 
           - You can not prove a negative...though those of us who understand the law clearly know that they are  ProgressiveProfessor   Mar-12-10 08:03 PM   #77 
           - LOL!! Let me educate you..  X_Digger   Mar-12-10 08:16 PM   #81 
           - It would seem there is a schism in the Church of Gun Control!  friendly_iconoclast   Mar-12-10 08:06 PM   #79 
           - Education is a good thing, you might try and get some on this topic before you further embarrass  ProgressiveProfessor   Mar-12-10 06:56 PM   #71 
           - The current US rifle rounds started life as civilian hunting rounds  Euromutt   Mar-12-10 11:53 PM   #86 
           - Well, point by point...  PavePusher   Mar-12-10 08:27 PM   #82 
        - Please tell me where it is legal to hunt with a 30-rnd magazine?  PavePusher   Mar-12-10 08:37 PM   #83 
     - Isn't it amazing that so many of the gun-control advocates here seem...  GreenStormCloud   Mar-12-10 05:43 PM   #63 
     - They'll just have to drive to Oregon, Nevada, or Arizona to buy it...  friendly_iconoclast   Mar-12-10 03:30 PM   #57 
        - Have you ever seen I-15 northbound from LA on a Friday night?  GreenStormCloud   Mar-12-10 05:46 PM   #64 
           - Yabut the new law DOES something about people buying ammo in CA!  friendly_iconoclast   Mar-12-10 08:13 PM   #80 
  - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Mar-12-10 06:21 PM   #67 
  - Victims of "gun free zones" need to be able to sue  oneshooter   Mar-12-10 07:24 PM   #74 
     - I like it, but it will never happen  ProgressiveProfessor   Mar-12-10 08:03 PM   #78 
        - Maybe it might. Maybe if the law firm of Dewey, Cheatem & Howe...  GreenStormCloud   Mar-12-10 08:49 PM   #84 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC