jody
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-05-10 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 9. The quote I gave is from D.C. v. Heller decided June 26, 2008 |
| -The controversial, individual right to self defense by use of a firearm... |
Glassunion |
Mar-05-10 02:53 PM |
#0 |
 -
Pennsylvania's is my personal favorite, too, since I live here. |
old mark |
Mar-05-10 03:00 PM |
#1 |
 -
I did love it when |
Glassunion |
Mar-05-10 03:04 PM |
#3 |
 -
It is probably illegal, too, but the ACLU won't do 2nd amendment cases- |
old mark |
Mar-05-10 03:56 PM |
#15 |
| -
I'm actually more surprised that the local |
Glassunion |
Mar-05-10 04:03 PM |
#17 |
| -
Central PA, born and raised. |
Callisto32 |
Mar-06-10 07:29 AM |
#28 |
| -
You are not Will Smith are you? |
Glassunion |
Mar-08-10 04:07 PM |
#36 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Mar-05-10 03:04 PM |
#2 |
| -
The HUMAN right to self defense |
shadowrider |
Mar-05-10 03:05 PM |
#4 |
| -
The problem is... |
Glassunion |
Mar-05-10 03:09 PM |
#6 |
| -
SCOTUS says "in United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U. S. 542, 553 (1876), '[t]his is not a |
jody |
Mar-05-10 03:09 PM |
#7 |
| -
problem is that Cruikshank |
qazplm |
Mar-05-10 03:33 PM |
#8 |
| -
The quote I gave is from D.C. v. Heller decided June 26, 2008 |
jody |
Mar-05-10 03:38 PM |
#9 |
| -
yes but the Court is deciding the application of the 2nd amendment |
qazplm |
Mar-05-10 03:46 PM |
#11 |
| -
How can SCOTUS ignore Cruikshank but retain Heller if the statement that RKBA is a preexisting right |
jody |
Mar-05-10 03:52 PM |
#12 |
| -
because they are pulling bits and pieces |
qazplm |
Mar-05-10 04:38 PM |
#20 |
| -
We'll have to wait a few more weeks until SCOTUS rules on the McDonald case. n/t |
jody |
Mar-05-10 04:49 PM |
#22 |
| -
But, but BUT...Stare Decisis. |
Callisto32 |
Mar-06-10 07:32 AM |
#29 |
| -
Of course it is. The founders view was that rights exists. The Bof R simply protects those rights. |
Statistical |
Mar-05-10 06:13 PM |
#23 |
| -
you don't need a gun for that. |
cabluedem |
Mar-07-10 02:27 AM |
#33 |
| -
It's not a question of need. |
Glassunion |
Mar-07-10 07:15 AM |
#34 |
| -
They're certainly the most effective means currently in existence |
Euromutt |
Mar-07-10 08:57 AM |
#35 |
| -
You know your summary |
one-eyed fat man |
Mar-10-10 07:46 AM |
#40 |
| -
On the matter of need - |
Mike K |
Mar-08-10 05:50 PM |
#38 |
| -
Interesting summary. You might like to browse the DU post below. |
jody |
Mar-05-10 03:06 PM |
#5 |
| -
Great post! |
Glassunion |
Mar-05-10 03:56 PM |
#14 |
| -
My position as a civil libertarian (not a member of the LP) is that all rights exist by default |
slackmaster |
Mar-05-10 03:40 PM |
#10 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Mar-05-10 03:56 PM |
#13 |
| -
California is heading that way |
slackmaster |
Mar-05-10 04:02 PM |
#16 |
| -
But it does make for some snappy flowcharts... |
Glassunion |
Mar-05-10 04:11 PM |
#18 |
| -
Damn, California's flowchart reminds me of this... |
spin |
Mar-06-10 08:10 PM |
#32 |
| -
What's wrong with that? nt |
cabluedem |
Mar-05-10 08:33 PM |
#25 |
| -
It's completely contradictory to our basic system of laws |
slackmaster |
Mar-05-10 09:22 PM |
#26 |
| -
I'll take it one further. |
Callisto32 |
Mar-06-10 07:34 AM |
#30 |
| -
Quite so |
Euromutt |
Mar-06-10 05:46 PM |
#31 |
| -
Oneshooter has never had a problem with breathing |
oneshooter |
Mar-05-10 04:31 PM |
#19 |
| -
I never doubted your respratory situation. |
Glassunion |
Mar-05-10 04:40 PM |
#21 |
| -
Good for my own state. |
proteus_lives |
Mar-05-10 06:38 PM |
#24 |
| -
Ditto for my |
cowman |
Mar-05-10 11:29 PM |
#27 |
| -
Virginia may not have it expressed...but.. |
backwoodsbob |
Mar-08-10 05:24 PM |
#37 |
| -
I have had a hard time finding anything... But... |
Glassunion |
Mar-09-10 10:55 AM |
#39 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread