villager
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-29-09 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #41 |
| 45. Uh, not really -- you've just quoted yet another rightwing editorial page |
| -EDITORIAL: The feds take a shot at guns... |
spin |
Oct-24-09 01:10 AM |
#0 |
 -
ah, quoting a Washington Times Moonie "editorial" now are, we? |
villager |
Oct-24-09 01:18 AM |
#1 |
 -
Typical anti. If you can't dispute the argument, attack the source. |
GreenStormCloud |
Oct-24-09 02:28 AM |
#2 |
| -
Normally I would agree with you. However.... |
krispos42 |
Oct-24-09 02:34 AM |
#4 |
| -
I am a bit new to DU. |
GreenStormCloud |
Oct-24-09 02:50 AM |
#5 |
| -
Certain sites are banned, but I wasn't implying that the WT is. |
krispos42 |
Oct-24-09 02:59 AM |
#6 |
 -
A scant few thoughts as well |
Katya Mullethov |
Oct-24-09 08:30 AM |
#12 |
| -
So treat it with the skepticism it deserves, but address the arguments |
Euromutt |
Oct-24-09 04:22 AM |
#7 |
| -
Typical apologist. Run a verbatim rightwing editorial and expect everyone on DU to swallow it. |
villager |
Oct-25-09 02:28 AM |
#20 |
| -
Here's a novel idea: how about we *discuss* its flaws and merits... |
Euromutt |
Oct-25-09 05:42 AM |
#21 |
| -
Still name calling, I see. Try discussion instead. N/T |
GreenStormCloud |
Oct-25-09 08:32 AM |
#23 |
| -
I agree. The use of "typical anti" was name-calling, and an indicator that "conversation" |
villager |
Oct-26-09 12:18 AM |
#32 |
| -
Come off it, villager, you're not occupying the moral high ground here |
Euromutt |
Oct-26-09 08:03 AM |
#33 |
| -
Ah, "my terms aren't perjorative -- but yours are!" |
villager |
Oct-26-09 12:11 PM |
#34 |
| -
I think you missed my post #21 |
Euromutt |
Oct-26-09 07:24 PM |
#35 |
| -
and since I've never been impressed by you and your snark, I'd say we're square! |
villager |
Oct-27-09 02:09 AM |
#36 |
| -
You've largely answered your own question |
Euromutt |
Oct-27-09 10:07 PM |
#37 |
| -
And yet a collective word like "anti" -- to describe a whole group of people -- you don't have any |
villager |
Oct-28-09 02:39 AM |
#38 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-28-09 03:02 AM |
#39 |
| -
Well, "asshole," you have once again proven exactly what and who you are |
villager |
Oct-29-09 11:22 AM |
#42 |
| -
Oh, diddums! |
Euromutt |
Oct-29-09 05:49 PM |
#43 |
| -
Welcome to the club! We meet on every 3rd Tuesday. n/t |
X_Digger |
Oct-29-09 07:06 PM |
#44 |
| -
So what short term do you prefer to refer to those on your side. |
GreenStormCloud |
Oct-28-09 08:25 AM |
#40 |
| -
I have started a thread using a different source. |
GreenStormCloud |
Oct-28-09 08:39 AM |
#41 |
| -
Uh, not really -- you've just quoted yet another rightwing editorial page |
villager |
Oct-29-09 11:05 PM |
#45 |
| -
Still refusing to discuss the topic, I see. |
GreenStormCloud |
Nov-01-09 09:35 PM |
#49 |
| -
When all else fails, invoke the "genetic fallacy" . |
friendly_iconoclast |
Nov-02-09 09:08 AM |
#51 |
| -
One thing that you have to understand... |
spin |
Oct-24-09 02:30 AM |
#3 |
| -
"left wing newspapers and organizations do not often publish pro-gun articles or editorials. " |
divideandconquer |
Oct-24-09 06:36 AM |
#8 |
| -
Hmmm. So Dianne Feinstein is a liberal and Russ Feingold isn't. Who knew? (n/t) |
benEzra |
Oct-24-09 07:42 AM |
#9 |
| -
More kneejerk cluelessness |
ProgressiveProfessor |
Oct-24-09 08:10 AM |
#10 |
| -
Could you please point out some progressive editorial news sites that are also pro RKBA? |
GreenStormCloud |
Oct-24-09 08:25 AM |
#11 |
| -
Who put you in charge of defining what it is to be liberal? |
slackmaster |
Oct-24-09 09:22 AM |
#13 |
| -
Well, thank goodness you are here to dictate the rules to us. n/t |
PavePusher |
Oct-24-09 10:24 AM |
#15 |
| -
D&C has been a really bozo, here and elsewhere, not to mention anti union |
ProgressiveProfessor |
Oct-24-09 06:54 PM |
#18 |
| -
Liberal should mean strong support for civil rights |
hack89 |
Oct-24-09 10:37 AM |
#16 |
| -
Umm, not really... |
SteveM |
Oct-25-09 10:14 AM |
#25 |
| -
"Being liberal is to be pro strong gun regulation" Oh, *really*? |
friendly_iconoclast |
Oct-25-09 03:22 PM |
#27 |
| -
Friendly correction: Zora Neale was a life-long Taftian Republican... |
SteveM |
Nov-01-09 09:01 PM |
#48 |
| -
Wrong! |
proteus_lives |
Oct-25-09 10:12 PM |
#31 |
| -
Very good points. Thanks |
Hoopla Phil |
Oct-24-09 09:38 AM |
#14 |
| -
Frankly the CDC got into this mess all by themselves... |
SteveM |
Oct-25-09 10:07 AM |
#24 |
| -
So now can we discuss the points of the editoral instead of the WT itself? |
GreenStormCloud |
Oct-24-09 12:50 PM |
#17 |
| -
That article is total garbage |
Taitertots |
Oct-24-09 07:34 PM |
#19 |
| -
Another anti who refuses to discuss specific points. |
GreenStormCloud |
Oct-25-09 08:31 AM |
#22 |
| -
You couldn't fail any worse |
Taitertots |
Oct-25-09 03:05 PM |
#26 |
| -
It *is* a newspaper editorial, not a research paper |
Euromutt |
Oct-25-09 06:33 PM |
#28 |
| -
Claiming there are journals without listing them is bad even in an editorial page |
Taitertots |
Oct-25-09 07:21 PM |
#29 |
| -
In principle, I don't disagree |
Euromutt |
Oct-25-09 07:32 PM |
#30 |
| -
Why ban legitimate research? |
radiotube |
Nov-01-09 05:36 PM |
#46 |
| -
If it were legitimate, no issue.. |
X_Digger |
Nov-01-09 05:50 PM |
#47 |
| -
Check out what the CDC says about "intervention strategies" re: gun control |
SteveM |
Nov-02-09 12:46 AM |
#50 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread