You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #55: Sterm Kever? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #46
55. Sterm Kever?
It's really not THAT hard to check the spelling of foreign language words or to comprehend the difference between a semiautomatic and an automatic firearm. One would expect that an allegedly major newspaper would take a moment or two to check the facts before they publish something that makes them look stupid.

LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Anti gunners force John Kerry to cosponsor extreme gun ban funkyflathead  Nov-24-03 01:43 PM   #0 
  - Too too funny....  MrBenchley   Nov-24-03 01:54 PM   #1 
  - They must jumped all over him  funkyflathead   Nov-24-03 02:19 PM   #5 
     - Yeah, surrrrrrrrrre....  MrBenchley   Nov-24-03 02:59 PM   #11 
  - Well, that guarantees....  DoNotRefill   Nov-24-03 01:56 PM   #2 
  - Does He Pass Your Himmler Test?  Paladin   Nov-24-03 05:21 PM   #17 
  - meanwhile the fascist police state is creeping up on us  el_gato   Nov-24-03 01:58 PM   #3 
  - No shit  1a2b3c   Nov-24-03 05:53 PM   #18 
  - "radical"? S 1431 bans assault weapons  ima_sinnic   Nov-24-03 02:13 PM   #4 
  - These times call for gun ownership.  funkyflathead   Nov-24-03 02:20 PM   #6 
  - Can you define "assault weapon" for us please?  slackmaster   Nov-24-03 03:49 PM   #15 
  - "Anti gunners force John Kerry ..."  iverglas   Nov-24-03 02:31 PM   #7 
  - Mr Benchley already asked n/t  funkyflathead   Nov-24-03 02:37 PM   #8 
  - nooooo  iverglas   Nov-24-03 02:40 PM   #9 
  - btw  iverglas   Nov-24-03 02:52 PM   #10 
  - I was tempted to...  MrBenchley   Nov-24-03 03:00 PM   #12 
  - Here is the Law as it is today.  happyslug   Nov-24-03 04:01 PM   #16 
  - Here S-1431  happyslug   Nov-24-03 03:46 PM   #13 
  - Here is S-1034  happyslug   Nov-24-03 03:48 PM   #14 
  - Kerry  solinvictus   Nov-24-03 09:00 PM   #19 
  - Both proposed laws and the current law is Unconstitutional  Withergyld   Nov-25-03 10:38 AM   #20 
  - Taken to its conclusion the NFA is unconstitutional as well  slackmaster   Nov-25-03 10:40 AM   #21 
  - Hahahahahahaha...  MrBenchley   Nov-25-03 10:46 AM   #22 
  - Mr B you claim I am wrong but offer no proof???  Withergyld   Nov-25-03 10:49 AM   #23 
     - Need proof?  MrBenchley   Nov-25-03 11:02 AM   #24 
        - red herring  Withergyld   Nov-25-03 11:04 AM   #25 
        - Nope...  MrBenchley   Nov-25-03 11:38 AM   #27 
           - In post 24  Withergyld   Nov-25-03 01:03 PM   #35 
              - Too frigging funny for words...  MrBenchley   Nov-25-03 01:25 PM   #36 
                 - Corporations are not natural persons therefore lack standing  slackmaster   Nov-25-03 01:27 PM   #38 
                    - Who the hell are you trying to kid, slack?  MrBenchley   Nov-25-03 01:41 PM   #41 
                       - Red Herring  slackmaster   Nov-25-03 01:45 PM   #43 
                          - Too frigging funny for words, slack....  MrBenchley   Nov-25-03 02:06 PM   #45 
                             - You're the one who's statements are funny, Benchley  slackmaster   Nov-25-03 03:58 PM   #58 
                                - Not even close to true....  MrBenchley   Nov-25-03 04:15 PM   #60 
                                   - Corporate speech is protected by the First Amendment  slackmaster   Nov-25-03 04:21 PM   #62 
                                      - Dream on, slack....  MrBenchley   Nov-25-03 04:29 PM   #66 
        - There's no need to sue to overturn the AWB  slackmaster   Nov-25-03 11:05 AM   #26 
           - Just like David Duke and Larry Pratt want...  MrBenchley   Nov-25-03 11:44 AM   #28 
              - No, like a Democratically controlled Congress passed in 1994  slackmaster   Nov-25-03 12:25 PM   #30 
                 - Well, slack  MrBenchley   Nov-25-03 01:00 PM   #33 
                    - The ban is not going to be "lifted"  slackmaster   Nov-25-03 01:01 PM   #34 
                       - You and Ted Nugent keep telling yourself that...  MrBenchley   Nov-25-03 01:26 PM   #37 
                       - What does Ted Nugent have to do with anything?  slackmaster   Nov-25-03 01:27 PM   #39 
                          - You and Larry Pratt and Tom DeLay  MrBenchley   Nov-25-03 01:36 PM   #40 
                             - Ridiculous propaganda piece written by an ignoramus  slackmaster   Nov-25-03 01:44 PM   #42 
                             - Gee, count on the RKBA crowd to be up on their Nazi trivia  MrBenchley   Nov-25-03 02:07 PM   #46 
                                - Sterm Kever?  slackmaster   Nov-25-03 03:28 PM   #55 
                             - More lies  demsrule4life   Nov-25-03 01:52 PM   #44 
                                - Dems, all you do is peddle more lies...  MrBenchley   Nov-25-03 02:09 PM   #47 
                                   - Mr B it is a real easy fucking test  demsrule4life   Nov-25-03 02:16 PM   #49 
                                      - Dems, let's test for truth...  MrBenchley   Nov-25-03 02:32 PM   #52 
                                         - But we are not talking about full automatic weapons  demsrule4life   Nov-25-03 02:41 PM   #53 
                                            - Facts mean nothing to the gun-grabber crowd, dems  slackmaster   Nov-25-03 03:41 PM   #57 
                                            - Deleted message  Name removed   Nov-25-03 04:29 PM   #65 
                                            - Who the hell are you trying to kid, dems?  MrBenchley   Nov-25-03 04:28 PM   #64 
                                               - And which ones would those be?  demsrule4life   Nov-25-03 04:46 PM   #68 
                                               - The ones sold at gun shows, dems...  MrBenchley   Nov-25-03 05:04 PM   #69 
                                               - MrBenchley is telling fairy tales again  slackmaster   Nov-25-03 05:17 PM   #70 
                                               - Gee slack....  MrBenchley   Nov-25-03 05:21 PM   #71 
                                               - Only a truly dishonest person...  slackmaster   Nov-25-03 05:26 PM   #73 
                                               - Gee, slack...  MrBenchley   Nov-25-03 05:36 PM   #75 
                                               - Straw Man  slackmaster   Nov-25-03 06:07 PM   #76 
                                               - I wouldn't know  demsrule4life   Nov-25-03 06:15 PM   #77 
                       - No offense  Deaner1971   Nov-25-03 02:21 PM   #51 
                          - Why?  slackmaster   Nov-25-03 04:00 PM   #59 
                             - What "absence"?  Deaner1971   Nov-25-03 04:26 PM   #63 
                                - You just blew my opinion of how well you understand the subject  slackmaster   Nov-25-03 05:24 PM   #72 
                                   - Sorry  Deaner1971   Nov-26-03 07:54 AM   #78 
                                      - With a large-capacity magazine you don't have to change mags as often  slackmaster   Nov-26-03 08:35 AM   #80 
                                         - Agreed  Deaner1971   Nov-26-03 08:49 AM   #81 
                                            - I agree with your analysis of where the 10 round limit came from  slackmaster   Nov-26-03 08:56 AM   #82 
                                               - Good discussion  Deaner1971   Nov-26-03 03:05 PM   #84 
  - Question  Deaner1971   Nov-25-03 12:18 PM   #29 
     - US v. Miller established Constitutionality of the tax provisions of the NF  slackmaster   Nov-25-03 12:27 PM   #31 
     - look at the basis of thier reasoning  Withergyld   Nov-25-03 12:55 PM   #32 
        - You can't look at "reasoning"  Deaner1971   Nov-25-03 02:20 PM   #50 
           - they considered three factors in their decision  Withergyld   Nov-25-03 03:00 PM   #54 
              - OK  Deaner1971   Nov-25-03 04:21 PM   #61 
                 - A debate without name calling is refreshing!  Withergyld   Nov-25-03 05:35 PM   #74 
                    - I agree, good debate  Deaner1971   Nov-26-03 08:23 AM   #79 
                       - Lets go through this point by point :)  Withergyld   Nov-26-03 10:21 AM   #83 
                          - We are getting too organized in our discussions  Deaner1971   Nov-26-03 03:16 PM   #85 
                             - Organized is good  Withergyld   Nov-26-03 03:32 PM   #86 
  - So we're still waiting to find out  MrBenchley   Nov-25-03 02:10 PM   #48 
     - Lobbying against him  funkyflathead   Nov-25-03 03:36 PM   #56 
        - And of course  MrBenchley   Nov-25-03 04:30 PM   #67 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC