You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #24: Need proof? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Need proof?
Tell us what happened in the Navegar suit to overturn the ban...(They lost, and the Supreme Court didn't bother to hear the appeal).

What happened in the Olympic Arms suit to overturn the ban? They lost again.

Worth noting that both of these suits were brought under the grounds that the ban violated the Commerce and Equal Protection clauses. Neither plaintiff even pretended the second amendment forbade the ban, and the second amendment wasn't brought up by either plaintiff.

Tell us, with, why didn't the NRA sue to overturn the ban on second amendment grounds? Why didn't the GOA sue? Answer: They knew the AWB was nno more unconstitutional than it was mint-flavored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC