You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #48: right, well I was finally bored enough to "watch" them [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #37
48. right, well I was finally bored enough to "watch" them

"Watching", of course, consists, in the first instance, of looking at a bunch of thoroughly icky verbal propaganda, and in the second, of a hokey enactment (I don't say re-enactment, because it is plainly not an honest representation of the event).

So the first one: "you can hear her very real fear filled call." No, I can't. I hear several minutes of her quite calmly conversing with the 911 operator. Very calmly, and with no indication of any fear at all, to my ear. It seems that the woman knows quite well who the individual is, and I'm never sure why all the retailing of this tale never includes the sort of details that would provide some context for this incident.

I'm having a hard time telling exactly when she fired at the other individual, but it seems to be at the precise moment she starts yelling at him.

Evidently the police/judicial response to the earlier problems was inadequate. Isn't that kind of a problem? Are gun militants everywhere joining with women's advocates and anybody else handy to demand reforms in how problems of this sort are addressed by police and the courts? Not seeing it, myself.

Also not seeing any reason to believe that the woman in question would have been killed or seriously injured before the police arrived if she had not killed the man who broke into her home ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -time for another "defensive gun use" thread iverglas  Jul-09-09 08:17 PM   #0 
  - ...  xchrom   Jul-09-09 08:25 PM   #1 
  - you didn't understand that at all, did you?  iverglas   Jul-09-09 08:30 PM   #3 
  - thanks for the survey  provis99   Jul-09-09 08:26 PM   #2 
  - forgive my snickering  iverglas   Jul-09-09 08:48 PM   #4 
  - What did you expect?  LAGC   Jul-10-09 08:23 PM   #33 
  - As a lifelong gun owner, may I say that this thread is about as useful as a JPEG of popcorn?  Richard Steele   Jul-09-09 09:06 PM   #5 
  - Serious question.  Statistical   Jul-09-09 09:27 PM   #6 
  - Do you think the sample size might be too small?  TXRAT2   Jul-09-09 09:40 PM   #7 
  - a re-re-incarnation??  iverglas   Jul-09-09 10:21 PM   #8 
  - It was the defensive gun use I was questioning.  TXRAT2   Jul-11-09 10:26 PM   #35 
     - and I was, obscurely,  iverglas   Jul-14-09 07:13 PM   #38 
  - Belated Welcome to DU!  Strong Atheist   Jul-10-09 03:06 PM   #30 
  - what was Kleck's sample size?  iverglas   Jul-09-09 10:29 PM   #10 
     - Why were the police, security guards and military excluded?  Fire_Medic_Dave   Jul-09-09 10:36 PM   #13 
     - LOL  TPaine7   Jul-10-09 03:02 PM   #29 
        - you don't understand this stuff, do you?  iverglas   Jul-14-09 07:32 PM   #40 
           - Wow.. you must be off your game tonight..  X_Digger   Jul-14-09 08:03 PM   #47 
           - your problem isn't mine  iverglas   Jul-14-09 08:45 PM   #49 
           - Good point iverglas!!!  TPaine7   Jul-14-09 10:43 PM   #51 
  - Great, meaningless surveys to go along with my meaningless anecdotes.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Jul-09-09 10:22 PM   #9 
  - you go ahead and unrecommend it now, Dave  iverglas   Jul-09-09 10:30 PM   #11 
     - Surely you must know me better than that. Stifling debate in that way is downright un-American.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Jul-09-09 10:33 PM   #12 
  - The most interesting part...  spin   Jul-10-09 12:10 AM   #14 
  - interesting to anybody who's been living under a rock, I guess  iverglas   Jul-10-09 12:18 AM   #15 
  - Oops, the statement was...  spin   Jul-10-09 12:36 AM   #17 
  - well I can't recommend it ;)  iverglas   Jul-10-09 01:06 AM   #19 
     - Rebooted and tried again...  spin   Jul-10-09 02:01 AM   #25 
  - There are two forms of it.  AtheistCrusader   Jul-10-09 01:06 AM   #18 
  - oh, let's not start (ed)  iverglas   Jul-10-09 01:10 AM   #21 
     - correct on both counts  AtheistCrusader   Jul-10-09 01:35 AM   #23 
  - "Obviously, all of that applies in spades to Kleck"  TPaine7   Jul-10-09 03:11 PM   #31 
  - fyi  iverglas   Jul-10-09 12:21 AM   #16 
     - The sample size is too small to determine...  spin   Jul-10-09 01:07 AM   #20 
        - and once again  iverglas   Jul-10-09 01:17 AM   #22 
           - I think you will agree that...  spin   Jul-10-09 01:56 AM   #24 
              - I think we're pretending the survey was something it wasn't  iverglas   Jul-10-09 02:02 AM   #26 
  - This looks to be the first "less than zero" thread here in the Gungeon  ProgressiveProfessor   Jul-10-09 11:34 AM   #27 
  - It was a very strong entry in the "less than zero" category.  TPaine7   Jul-10-09 03:13 PM   #32 
  - sorry, I beat you to that  iverglas   Jul-14-09 07:35 PM   #41 
  - Yawn...  TPaine7   Jul-10-09 02:49 PM   #28 
  - "Hemenway--isn't he the guy who compared defensive gun uses to alien abductions?"  iverglas   Jul-14-09 07:37 PM   #42 
     - Yawn...  TPaine7   Jul-14-09 09:43 PM   #50 
        - "Apparently he didn't compare DGUs to alien abductions but to alien encounters. "  iverglas   Jul-15-09 10:09 AM   #53 
           - How's your nose, iverglas?  TPaine7   Jul-15-09 03:49 PM   #54 
              - not impeding my view of the pixels, unlike yours?  iverglas   Jul-15-09 05:02 PM   #56 
                 - You are so confused  TPaine7   Jul-15-09 11:31 PM   #58 
  - Does the method section say whether or not the respondents were told their stories  aikoaiko   Jul-10-09 11:18 PM   #34 
  - you'd have to read that  iverglas   Jul-14-09 07:38 PM   #43 
  - To what fruitation does this survey lend itself?  OneTenthofOnePercent   Jul-13-09 08:47 AM   #36 
  - ya got me there  iverglas   Jul-14-09 07:39 PM   #44 
  - best I can do on that first bit  iverglas   Jul-14-09 07:42 PM   #45 
  - This is all I need to know about defensive gun use.  gorfle   Jul-13-09 09:43 AM   #37 
     - Wow, deciding public policy on the basis of two videos  jgraz   Jul-14-09 07:15 PM   #39 
     - and a hokey one at that  iverglas   Jul-14-09 07:53 PM   #46 
        - But she didn't get to shoot anybody!!!!1111  jgraz   Jul-14-09 11:11 PM   #52 
     - right, well I was finally bored enough to "watch" them  iverglas   Jul-14-09 08:07 PM   #48 
     - Some people are having trouble understanding the difference between  TPaine7   Jul-15-09 03:56 PM   #55 
        - actually  iverglas   Jul-15-09 05:05 PM   #57 
           - I fully recognize the relationship  TPaine7   Jul-16-09 12:14 AM   #59 
              - dang, I missed this  iverglas   Jul-19-09 04:18 PM   #60 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC