Reply #49: Clear?

[Joe Steel]

OP asked "Do you gun guys really believe you could resist a serious effort to disarm you?"

My answer was "Do you anti-gun guys and gals really believe the majority of LEO and military would support you?"

You then replied "Doesn't make any difference."

What do you mean by your OP question and subsequent posts in this thread.

Assume a number of persons who are not employed as law enforcement officers or military own guns. If those individuals were made subject to a law prohibiting gun possession and requiring any guns they possess to be delivered to to the government, would they do it?

The cooperation of law enforement officers and would not matter. If they didn't cooperate, they would be replaced.

Clear?

I've browsed an adequate sample of your posts since December 2008 and found them to without substance and laced with phrases apparently intended to inflame a rational, reasonable discussion of the natural, inherent, inalienable/unalienable or pre-existing right to keep and bear arms for self-defense.

What is your intent with your post since it does not appear to be to debate RKBA?

If you've honestly come to that conclusion, you're not fit to post here. My opinions have been developed over a number of years and represent a fair analysis of the relevant material. Obviously, your opinions are unsophisticated and simplistic and are insult to intelligence of anyone who wastes time reading them. Apparently, you wish to do nothing more than waste your readers' time.