Tim01
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-05-09 08:40 AM
Response to Original message |
| 18. Guns will get the democrats thrown out of washington. |
|
I can just about guarantee that.
When Clinton passed the last AWB there was a political backlash. But gun owners hadn't really taken the potential ban seriously.
Now there are LOTS more gun owners, LOTS more gun owning democrats and gun owners are now well organized and prepared for a political fight over guns.
This is a whole new ball game compared to last time. Even Remington has a hunting rifle based on the AR15 platform.
Gun owners won't be playing around this time. There will be communication, money, and votes. It's already started.
It is a choice between the 2nd amendment and Republicans.
|
| -Gun control - Should no longer be considered a "side burner issue" |
Hellataz |
Apr-05-09 03:39 AM |
#0 |
 -
I appreciate all the thought in that post, but I believe that I disagree. |
Political Heretic |
Apr-05-09 04:10 AM |
#1 |
  -
You have a point, there should be some test studies done. |
Hellataz |
Apr-05-09 05:49 AM |
#7 |
| -
Interesting intent.. logistics? |
X_Digger |
Apr-05-09 01:18 PM |
#20 |
| -
I agree. We need a new assault weapons ban, Also a ban on bullet proof vests. nt |
cabluedem |
Apr-05-09 04:11 AM |
#2 |
| -
Why do we need another "assault weapons" ban? |
ManiacJoe |
Apr-05-09 08:49 PM |
#29 |
| -
Seems like another wedge issue |
me b zola |
Apr-05-09 04:50 AM |
#3 |
| -
I think if it saved lives it wold help dems. |
Hellataz |
Apr-05-09 06:20 AM |
#11 |
| -
Unless and until you ban all guns.. |
X_Digger |
Apr-05-09 01:22 PM |
#21 |
| -
The danger of economic dislocation -- or even the threat of such dislocation . . . |
MrModerate |
Apr-05-09 05:06 AM |
#4 |
| -
But this started not because of the economy, but because of who got elected. |
Hellataz |
Apr-05-09 05:59 AM |
#8 |
| -
Stupid seemingly has no bottom . . . |
MrModerate |
Apr-05-09 04:53 PM |
#25 |
| -
If you think gun ownership under the Constitution is a privilege |
cali |
Apr-05-09 05:14 AM |
#5 |
| -
Then Maybe i don't if it means thinking any criminal and psycho has the right to bare arms |
Hellataz |
Apr-05-09 05:43 AM |
#6 |
| -
But, I really, really need to buy six guns a week... |
rfranklin |
Apr-05-09 06:06 AM |
#9 |
| -
I really don't understand the need to stockpile weapons, it screams "devious motive" |
Hellataz |
Apr-05-09 06:17 AM |
#10 |
| -
I know many folks with multiple guns |
cali |
Apr-05-09 06:25 AM |
#13 |
| -
I'm glad to hear that, it must feel safe for you to live there. |
Hellataz |
Apr-05-09 06:48 AM |
#15 |
| -
It's your money; spend it as you wish. |
ManiacJoe |
Apr-05-09 08:53 PM |
#31 |
| -
exactly, criminals and "psychos" don't have the right to bear arms. under the law |
cali |
Apr-05-09 06:23 AM |
#12 |
| -
I said "with ease" because i knew "cars" would be brought up |
Hellataz |
Apr-05-09 06:46 AM |
#14 |
| -
There Is No Proof |
Possumpoint |
Apr-05-09 07:42 AM |
#16 |
| -
Then TN must be up to no good.... |
poboyross |
Apr-05-09 06:17 PM |
#27 |
| -
It's not an absolute right. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Apr-05-09 08:43 PM |
#28 |
| -
If gun ownership is a privilege, then so is free speech. One is as |
old mark |
Apr-05-09 07:53 AM |
#17 |
| -
Maybe the poster thinks . . . as many of us do . . . |
MrModerate |
Apr-05-09 04:55 PM |
#26 |
| -
Guns will get the democrats thrown out of washington. |
Tim01 |
Apr-05-09 08:40 AM |
#18 |
| -
Your post was kind of all over the place. |
NewMoonTherian |
Apr-05-09 08:46 AM |
#19 |
| -
your post is filled with ignorance |
bossy22 |
Apr-05-09 01:38 PM |
#22 |
| -
You're a chicken little. |
aikoaiko |
Apr-05-09 02:19 PM |
#23 |
| -
So why won't drug dealers and smugglers just switch to guns? |
friendly_iconoclast |
Apr-05-09 04:04 PM |
#24 |
| -
Your right.. Not a side burner |
virginia mountainman |
Apr-05-09 08:50 PM |
#30 |
| -
Some points. |
gorfle |
Apr-05-09 09:15 PM |
#32 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread