Hellataz
(804 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-05-09 06:17 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 10. I really don't understand the need to stockpile weapons, it screams "devious motive" |
|
Edited on Sun Apr-05-09 06:21 AM by Hellataz
My friend has like 16 guns, I cannot fathom having that many if you only want them for home security. His answer is he likes to target shoot at the range. JMO but that seems like a dangerous and pointless hobbie.
|
| -Gun control - Should no longer be considered a "side burner issue" |
Hellataz |
Apr-05-09 03:39 AM |
#0 |
-
I appreciate all the thought in that post, but I believe that I disagree. |
Political Heretic |
Apr-05-09 04:10 AM |
#1 |
 -
You have a point, there should be some test studies done. |
Hellataz |
Apr-05-09 05:49 AM |
#7 |
-
Interesting intent.. logistics? |
X_Digger |
Apr-05-09 01:18 PM |
#20 |
-
I agree. We need a new assault weapons ban, Also a ban on bullet proof vests. nt |
cabluedem |
Apr-05-09 04:11 AM |
#2 |
 -
Why do we need another "assault weapons" ban? |
ManiacJoe |
Apr-05-09 08:49 PM |
#29 |
-
Seems like another wedge issue |
me b zola |
Apr-05-09 04:50 AM |
#3 |
 -
I think if it saved lives it wold help dems. |
Hellataz |
Apr-05-09 06:20 AM |
#11 |
-
Unless and until you ban all guns.. |
X_Digger |
Apr-05-09 01:22 PM |
#21 |
-
The danger of economic dislocation -- or even the threat of such dislocation . . . |
MrModerate |
Apr-05-09 05:06 AM |
#4 |
 -
But this started not because of the economy, but because of who got elected. |
Hellataz |
Apr-05-09 05:59 AM |
#8 |
-
Stupid seemingly has no bottom . . . |
MrModerate |
Apr-05-09 04:53 PM |
#25 |
-
If you think gun ownership under the Constitution is a privilege |
cali |
Apr-05-09 05:14 AM |
#5 |
 -
Then Maybe i don't if it means thinking any criminal and psycho has the right to bare arms |
Hellataz |
Apr-05-09 05:43 AM |
#6 |
  -
But, I really, really need to buy six guns a week... |
rfranklin |
Apr-05-09 06:06 AM |
#9 |
   -
I really don't understand the need to stockpile weapons, it screams "devious motive" |
Hellataz |
Apr-05-09 06:17 AM |
#10 |
    -
I know many folks with multiple guns |
cali |
Apr-05-09 06:25 AM |
#13 |
   -
I'm glad to hear that, it must feel safe for you to live there. |
Hellataz |
Apr-05-09 06:48 AM |
#15 |
   -
It's your money; spend it as you wish. |
ManiacJoe |
Apr-05-09 08:53 PM |
#31 |
  -
exactly, criminals and "psychos" don't have the right to bear arms. under the law |
cali |
Apr-05-09 06:23 AM |
#12 |
   -
I said "with ease" because i knew "cars" would be brought up |
Hellataz |
Apr-05-09 06:46 AM |
#14 |
  -
There Is No Proof |
Possumpoint |
Apr-05-09 07:42 AM |
#16 |
  -
Then TN must be up to no good.... |
poboyross |
Apr-05-09 06:17 PM |
#27 |
  -
It's not an absolute right. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Apr-05-09 08:43 PM |
#28 |
 -
If gun ownership is a privilege, then so is free speech. One is as |
old mark |
Apr-05-09 07:53 AM |
#17 |
 -
Maybe the poster thinks . . . as many of us do . . . |
MrModerate |
Apr-05-09 04:55 PM |
#26 |
-
Guns will get the democrats thrown out of washington. |
Tim01 |
Apr-05-09 08:40 AM |
#18 |
-
Your post was kind of all over the place. |
NewMoonTherian |
Apr-05-09 08:46 AM |
#19 |
-
your post is filled with ignorance |
bossy22 |
Apr-05-09 01:38 PM |
#22 |
-
You're a chicken little. |
aikoaiko |
Apr-05-09 02:19 PM |
#23 |
-
So why won't drug dealers and smugglers just switch to guns? |
friendly_iconoclast |
Apr-05-09 04:04 PM |
#24 |
-
Your right.. Not a side burner |
virginia mountainman |
Apr-05-09 08:50 PM |
#30 |
-
Some points. |
gorfle |
Apr-05-09 09:15 PM |
#32 |