You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court allows firearms in locked vehicles at work. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
gorfle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 08:57 AM
Original message
Court allows firearms in locked vehicles at work.
Advertisements [?]
"Court allows Oklahoma workers to have guns in vehicle"

http://newsok.com/court-allows-oklahoma-workers-to-have...

"The law, which allows nonfelons to lock legal guns in their vehicles while parked at work, was passed in two stages in 2004 and 2005.

The law was proposed by legislators after Weyerhauser reportedly fired eight workers who violated policy by having guns in their vehicles at a mill in southeastern Oklahoma."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Court allows firearms in locked vehicles at work. gorfle  Feb-20-09 08:57 AM   #0 
  - We have this in Florida now, as long as you hold a vaild CCW permit.  scrinmaster   Feb-20-09 09:28 AM   #1 
  - and once again  iverglas   Feb-20-09 09:51 AM   #2 
  - Could you please point out what "rights" are being tossed out the window? n/t  Raskolnik   Feb-20-09 10:14 AM   #3 
  - I'll play  iverglas   Feb-20-09 10:50 AM   #4 
     - Why should I have to guess at what you are trying to say? That's childish at best,  Raskolnik   Feb-20-09 11:23 AM   #6 
     - awwww, pout pout pout  iverglas   Feb-20-09 11:54 AM   #7 
        - Ah, so you *want* to make the point that the property rights of the employer are at issue  Raskolnik   Feb-20-09 12:18 PM   #8 
        - born yesterday, were we?  iverglas   Feb-20-09 12:34 PM   #10 
           - Weak, Iverglas. Very weak.  Raskolnik   Feb-20-09 12:55 PM   #15 
           - Bwhahahahahah!  gorfle   Feb-20-09 01:13 PM   #18 
           - you haven't noticed that I don't give a flying fuck?  iverglas   Feb-20-09 01:18 PM   #20 
              - I've noticed that you don't care enough to educate yourself, but you care enough to complain.  Raskolnik   Feb-20-09 01:25 PM   #22 
              - hmm  iverglas   Feb-20-09 01:45 PM   #29 
                 - Sounds like Ron Paul is in the building  Taitertots   Feb-20-09 02:04 PM   #34 
                 - yuppers  iverglas   Feb-20-09 02:19 PM   #36 
                    - OK Ron Paul  Taitertots   Feb-20-09 02:54 PM   #45 
                    - and now...  gorfle   Feb-21-09 09:43 AM   #93 
                 - Iverglas, you aren't doing yourself any favors right now.  Raskolnik   Feb-20-09 02:15 PM   #35 
                    - well well  iverglas   Feb-20-09 02:21 PM   #37 
                    - You want me to teach you ConLaw on the DU messageboard?  Raskolnik   Feb-20-09 02:41 PM   #41 
                       - yeah  iverglas   Feb-20-09 03:30 PM   #51 
                          - None? Really?  Raskolnik   Feb-20-09 03:56 PM   #59 
                             - apparently  iverglas   Feb-20-09 04:35 PM   #68 
                                - Nope, still not cutting it.  Raskolnik   Feb-20-09 04:50 PM   #72 
                                   - "public"  iverglas   Feb-20-09 05:21 PM   #79 
                                   - That's right. This is all about oppressing women, racial, ethnic, religious and sexual minorities.  Raskolnik   Feb-20-09 10:55 PM   #91 
                                   - Ding!  gorfle   Feb-21-09 09:54 AM   #94 
                                   - dear dear me  iverglas   Feb-21-09 07:28 PM   #97 
                    - would you at least bother to spell her name right? n/t  Scout   Feb-20-09 03:30 PM   #50 
                       - huh? n/t  Raskolnik   Feb-20-09 03:32 PM   #52 
                          - pretty simple request/question, for such a lofty mind ... what's not to understand? n/t  Scout   Feb-20-09 03:37 PM   #57 
                             - I wasn't aware that I was misspelling anyone's name.  Raskolnik   Feb-20-09 03:57 PM   #60 
                             - I'm a bit of a third party here  iverglas   Feb-20-09 05:02 PM   #76 
                                - My sincere apologies.  Raskolnik   Feb-20-09 05:09 PM   #77 
                                - sorry to butt in like that  Scout   Feb-20-09 09:07 PM   #88 
                             - Ok, mystery solved. Thanks for you input. You really added a lot to this discussion.  Raskolnik   Feb-20-09 05:10 PM   #78 
                                - you can take your condescending attitude, fold it five ways, and shove it  Scout   Feb-20-09 09:03 PM   #87 
                                   - Condescending? Moi? Perish the thought.  Raskolnik   Feb-20-09 10:53 PM   #90 
              - It seems to me that no rights are being violated of the employers.  57_TomCat   Feb-20-09 03:22 PM   #48 
              - I'm afraid  iverglas   Feb-20-09 03:32 PM   #53 
                 - But you could not resist could you.  57_TomCat   Feb-20-09 04:10 PM   #63 
              - Wow, Iverglas is learning!  gorfle   Feb-21-09 09:39 AM   #92 
              - the odd thing here  iverglas   Feb-21-09 07:30 PM   #98 
                 - whimper whimper whimper.  gorfle   Feb-22-09 10:20 AM   #100 
              - Deleted message  Name removed   Feb-22-09 01:18 PM   #102 
           - "Equality rights"  gorfle   Feb-20-09 01:17 PM   #19 
              - so?  iverglas   Feb-20-09 01:20 PM   #21 
                 - I wasn't trying to make one.  gorfle   Feb-20-09 01:31 PM   #26 
        - their property  paulsby   Feb-23-09 12:29 AM   #108 
           - and some for you  iverglas   Feb-23-09 09:52 AM   #109 
              - analogy  paulsby   Feb-23-09 01:33 PM   #110 
                 - snork  iverglas   Feb-23-09 02:37 PM   #111 
     - You seem to be regressing.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Feb-22-09 01:16 PM   #101 
  - It's one of the perks...  gorfle   Feb-20-09 01:02 PM   #17 
  - ignore  marksmithfield   Feb-20-09 03:41 PM   #58 
     - snooze  iverglas   Feb-20-09 04:39 PM   #69 
  - Frankly I don't think you should leave a gun unattended in public.  TheWraith   Feb-20-09 10:52 AM   #5 
  - You have a point, and I have a solution...  spin   Feb-20-09 12:26 PM   #9 
  - and if the car is stolen  iverglas   Feb-20-09 12:35 PM   #11 
     - No, but it would remain securely locked.  TheWraith   Feb-20-09 12:39 PM   #13 
     - ... until somebody got it open.  iverglas   Feb-20-09 12:45 PM   #14 
        - 2 locked containers not enough?  gorfle   Feb-20-09 01:28 PM   #24 
           - what more could be done?  iverglas   Feb-20-09 01:46 PM   #30 
              - Sorry, not an option.  gorfle   Feb-20-09 02:48 PM   #44 
              - yes an option  iverglas   Feb-20-09 03:33 PM   #54 
              - I'm glad.  gorfle   Feb-20-09 04:13 PM   #64 
                 - "I'm glad my whims jive with the court."  iverglas   Feb-20-09 04:40 PM   #70 
                    - I'm lovin' it.  gorfle   Feb-20-09 04:56 PM   #74 
              - better a pantywaist than a paranoid n/t  Scout   Feb-20-09 03:36 PM   #55 
                 - Better prepared when you don't need it than unprepared when you do. n/t  gorfle   Feb-20-09 04:14 PM   #65 
                    - you agree that you're paranoid then, i see. n/t  Scout   Feb-20-09 04:19 PM   #67 
                       - I guess so.  gorfle   Feb-20-09 04:55 PM   #73 
                          - huh  iverglas   Feb-20-09 06:25 PM   #80 
                             - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Feb-20-09 06:36 PM   #81 
              - Why iverglas  marksmithfield   Feb-20-09 03:58 PM   #61 
                 - uh, mu?  iverglas   Feb-20-09 04:48 PM   #71 
                    - MUUUuuuuuuuu!  gorfle   Feb-20-09 06:38 PM   #82 
                       - "I always envision a fat old hairy cow every time you write that."  iverglas   Feb-20-09 07:00 PM   #83 
                          - MuuuuuUUUuuUUuuUuuUuuu!  gorfle   Feb-20-09 07:17 PM   #84 
     - You also have a point, and I have a solution...  spin   Feb-20-09 01:35 PM   #27 
     - .. because a house with a safe is too heavy to carry?  X_Digger   Feb-20-09 01:40 PM   #28 
     - Maybe.  AtheistCrusader   Feb-20-09 07:21 PM   #86 
  - I agree.  gorfle   Feb-20-09 01:26 PM   #23 
  - you mean ...  iverglas   Feb-20-09 01:47 PM   #31 
     - Since that is not an option...  gorfle   Feb-20-09 02:44 PM   #42 
  - A good point and I see car gun safes have been mentioned.  57_TomCat   Feb-20-09 03:29 PM   #49 
  - I liked this bit  iverglas   Feb-20-09 12:38 PM   #12 
  - Which you haven't bothered to read.  Raskolnik   Feb-20-09 12:56 PM   #16 
  - I liked it, too.  gorfle   Feb-20-09 01:30 PM   #25 
     - actually  iverglas   Feb-20-09 01:48 PM   #32 
     - And...  gorfle   Feb-20-09 02:45 PM   #43 
        - the NRA  paulsby   Feb-23-09 04:12 PM   #115 
           - "it would make sense"  iverglas   Feb-23-09 04:21 PM   #119 
              - except you are wrong  paulsby   Feb-23-09 04:27 PM   #121 
                 - why do you ask?  iverglas   Feb-23-09 04:30 PM   #124 
                    - maybe you need  paulsby   Feb-23-09 04:33 PM   #126 
                       - think it through, now  iverglas   Feb-23-09 04:41 PM   #129 
                          - non-responsive  paulsby   Feb-23-09 04:43 PM   #130 
                             - "histrionic"?  iverglas   Feb-23-09 04:48 PM   #132 
     - I might have to donate more  Taitertots   Feb-20-09 01:57 PM   #33 
        - yuppers  iverglas   Feb-20-09 02:24 PM   #38 
           - I'll keep voting Democrat  Taitertots   Feb-20-09 02:38 PM   #39 
              - gotta keep saying it  iverglas   Feb-20-09 02:40 PM   #40 
                 - Just keep doing it  Taitertots   Feb-20-09 03:05 PM   #46 
  - It seems to me  rrneck   Feb-20-09 03:16 PM   #47 
  - whose intent?  iverglas   Feb-20-09 03:36 PM   #56 
     - Yes, they can. That is how these  rrneck   Feb-20-09 09:18 PM   #89 
        - good luck with that  iverglas   Feb-21-09 07:35 PM   #99 
  - The question is...  spin   Feb-20-09 04:02 PM   #62 
  - Another question is whether they have a right to search it  slackmaster   Feb-20-09 04:15 PM   #66 
  - mere facts  iverglas   Feb-20-09 04:57 PM   #75 
  - Since you have an excellent legal background...  spin   Feb-20-09 07:18 PM   #85 
  - this is typical... "felt"  paulsby   Feb-23-09 04:07 PM   #113 
     - indeed  iverglas   Feb-23-09 04:10 PM   #114 
        - if a person talks about the way guns make them "feel"  paulsby   Feb-23-09 04:13 PM   #116 
           - having a clue whereof you speak  iverglas   Feb-23-09 04:26 PM   #120 
              - you can play  paulsby   Feb-23-09 04:29 PM   #123 
                 - so you retract your non-evidence-based allegation  iverglas   Feb-23-09 04:38 PM   #127 
                    - i said it was evidence  paulsby   Feb-23-09 04:39 PM   #128 
                       - kind of like what I presented  iverglas   Feb-23-09 04:46 PM   #131 
  - PA state hospitals will terminate immediately any employee  old mark   Feb-21-09 12:46 PM   #95 
  - Pennsylvania needs to pass a "bring your gun to work" law like Florida...  spin   Feb-21-09 03:55 PM   #96 
  - Since when  Furyataurus   Feb-22-09 01:53 PM   #103 
     - In most instances, corporations aren't even people; they are legal constructs  benEzra   Feb-22-09 02:22 PM   #104 
     - Yep. nt  rrneck   Feb-22-09 07:06 PM   #106 
     - The problem is employment at will  Indy Lurker   Feb-22-09 04:02 PM   #105 
  - the graduate school i went to  paulsby   Feb-23-09 04:04 PM   #112 
     - and let's have a big round of applause to welcome  iverglas   Feb-23-09 04:13 PM   #117 
        - do you have a problem with reading comprehension?  paulsby   Feb-23-09 04:21 PM   #118 
           - really?  iverglas   Feb-23-09 04:29 PM   #122 
              - So, you admit you are wrong  paulsby   Feb-23-09 04:31 PM   #125 
                 - ya think?  iverglas   Feb-23-09 04:50 PM   #133 
  - Great news!!! Finally some respect for MY personal property rights  Longteeth   Feb-22-09 07:18 PM   #107 
  - A reasonable compromise.  aikoaiko   Feb-24-09 05:48 AM   #134 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC