Reply #59: You misquote me. I say you shouldn't have to fire "semi-auto" - FIRE, if you can't take down

[ShortnFiery]

as Deer with a high powered rifle without, say firing over a half dozen SEPARATE shots, then just perhaps, you should allow the "wolf population" to thin out the older and weaker of the species.

Don't give me this "song and dance" about how most hunters are "thoughtful" and "moral" because I've seen them all too *blood lusting* and drunk on the weekends in our rural areas to help you perpetuate the myth.

Kudos to you and your father-in-law if you subscribe to a code of conduct, but there's far more "pseudo hunters" than you would like admit.

Stricter gun laws would allow you and your father-in-law to "thin the herd" of deer population. There should be far fewer hunting licenses and those who are granted should be restricted to those who are not in it strictly for "the thrill."

No, I admit that the banning of semi-auto rifles will not come to pass albeit their accuracy is usually quite wanting. Perhaps it takes a second and third shot if you suck on your first to put the animal out of misery. I'll give you that. However, I'd bet money that many deer are found riddled with bullets - yeah that's real sport --- CHAMP. :(