You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #23: Look, buddy, YOU DELIBERATELY CHOSE TO CITE SCALIA AS YOUR "EXPERT"... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
Herman74 Donating Member (429 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Look, buddy, YOU DELIBERATELY CHOSE TO CITE SCALIA AS YOUR "EXPERT"...
...read your own freakin' words and weep:

"But ... in the decision itself Scalia said that the laws forbidding guns for the felon or mentally unstable were clearly constitutional." Okay, will you explain to us all just how the criminal, Scalia, is an expert on constitutional law, or will you once again evade the issue????? I'm guessing the latter.

Only a complete fool would ever cite the criminal, Scalia, as an expert in constitutional law, agreed???? Game. Set. Match. You lose.

This last time, though, you finally realized that Scalia alone wasn't nearly enough. So you trot out some other names designed to impress people. Well, I'm not impressed by any of them (especially not by Dershowitz), and you might want to use a spell-check next time, to save us from having to deal with "everythign" and "Desrhowitz."

And I haven't lost the gun control argument, not as long as THE UNITED STATES EASILY HAS A HIGHER MURDER RATE THAN ALL WESTERN, INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES (MOST HAVING GUN CONTROL TO SOME NOTABLE DEGREE). I'll say it once: If anyone's lost, it's you. Even with regards to the U.S. Supreme Court, the decision was 5 to 4, your fellow gunlover, Bush, appointing two of the five, and we both know that future Supreme Courts can overturn previous Supreme Court decisions. Funny, I sort of see Obama appointing justices in the mode of Breyer and Ginsburg rather than Roberts and "Machine-Gun Sammy" Alito, what do you think, DonP?? I'll say it a second time: if anyone's lost, it's you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Supreme Court decision in action. zanne  Jul-23-08 08:20 AM   #0 
  - And his appeal will fail  aspergris   Jul-23-08 08:24 AM   #1 
  - Read an interesting tidbit on this the other day......  Boomer 50   Jul-25-08 07:55 PM   #52 
  - Better thread title would have been "Zealous, but futile, legal defense in action"  aikoaiko   Jul-23-08 08:29 AM   #2 
  - Just one of many in the last two weeks  DonP   Jul-23-08 08:39 AM   #3 
  - Actually, the felons have a valid point here.  zanne   Jul-23-08 08:46 AM   #4 
  - No, it isn't  tburnsten   Jul-23-08 08:50 AM   #5 
  - I'm sure the NRA will help them out with this. nt  zanne   Jul-23-08 08:53 AM   #6 
     - I'm sure they will stand by their position on the matter  tburnsten   Jul-23-08 08:57 AM   #7 
        - Lighten up, thurnsten.  zanne   Jul-23-08 09:03 AM   #8 
           - Your humor seems kind of... Flat. N/T  tburnsten   Jul-23-08 09:04 AM   #9 
           - I think it's cultural. nt  zanne   Jul-23-08 09:07 AM   #10 
           - So when you get caught you act like it was a joke, that's funny.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Jul-25-08 05:35 PM   #51 
              - Thanks Dave  tburnsten   Jul-26-08 07:05 PM   #53 
  - No they don't  michreject   Jul-23-08 01:07 PM   #19 
  - You are very misinformed.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Jul-25-08 05:32 PM   #50 
  - SINCE WHEN IS SCALIA AN EXPERT ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW????  Herman74   Jul-23-08 09:16 AM   #11 
     - Even though he's right?  tburnsten   Jul-23-08 09:28 AM   #12 
     - Alleged rightness does not establish expertise...  Herman74   Jul-23-08 03:15 PM   #26 
     - And the straw doth fly (nt)  SteveM   Jul-23-08 09:32 AM   #13 
     - So tell us, Herman74, do you think convicted felons should be able to own guns?  slackmaster   Jul-23-08 10:23 AM   #15 
     - I don't think anyone should be able to own guns n/t  Herman74   Jul-23-08 03:12 PM   #25 
        - You may be grossly misguided, but at least you are consistent  slackmaster   Jul-23-08 03:57 PM   #27 
        - ..  pipoman   Jul-23-08 08:43 PM   #39 
     - If it means more rights for gun owners...  zanne   Jul-23-08 10:37 AM   #16 
     - why do antis always come up with horrid fantasies?  Tejas   Jul-23-08 06:50 PM   #33 
        - I think it boils down to projection  slackmaster   Jul-23-08 08:34 PM   #38 
     - I don't care if Scalia ate your kitten.  AtheistCrusader   Jul-23-08 11:26 AM   #17 
     - Your crappy "guilt by association" argument stinks!  DonP   Jul-23-08 12:19 PM   #18 
     - Look, buddy, YOU DELIBERATELY CHOSE TO CITE SCALIA AS YOUR "EXPERT"...  Herman74   Jul-23-08 02:47 PM   #23 
        - Gee, I don't think I have any "buddies" that are fascists ...  DonP   Jul-23-08 05:18 PM   #30 
        - Sorry about that, come to think of it, I did indeed get a bit too friendly....  Herman74   Jul-23-08 09:26 PM   #40 
           - Because the ban on cocaine and heroin is going swimmingly  tburnsten   Jul-24-08 07:57 AM   #42 
           - So gun owners are incapable of valuing human life?  Fire_Medic_Dave   Jul-25-08 05:30 PM   #49 
        - You're picking a fight in an empty bar room (nt)  SteveM   Jul-23-08 05:54 PM   #31 
        - Yep, and he's losing fast n/t  Tejas   Jul-23-08 06:52 PM   #34 
           - Lots of "shouting" too  DonP   Jul-24-08 11:43 AM   #43 
        - Interesting to note.  gorfle   Jul-24-08 11:52 AM   #45 
           - THATS NOT FAIR!!!  beevul   Jul-24-08 04:40 PM   #46 
           - C'mon if he didn't read the decision ...  DonP   Jul-24-08 05:55 PM   #47 
     - "Only a COMPLETE FOOL"  TPaine7   Jul-23-08 02:21 PM   #21 
     - The issue, is regarding Scalia as an expert on what is "clearly constitutional"  Herman74   Jul-23-08 02:53 PM   #24 
        - The issue is: is Heller a correct interpretation of the constitution.  Otto DeFay   Jul-23-08 04:13 PM   #28 
        - Honesty v/s Expertise  Real_Talk   Jul-23-08 04:43 PM   #29 
        - Is someone free to disregard Roe Vs Wade *if* ...  friendly_iconoclast   Jul-24-08 10:28 PM   #48 
     - I guess since you started calling him one?  Tejas   Jul-23-08 06:46 PM   #32 
     - On Scalia.  gorfle   Jul-24-08 11:47 AM   #44 
  - Sounds like zanne, Barton, and the other defendants haven't actually read the Heller decision  slackmaster   Jul-23-08 09:57 AM   #14 
  - Knowledge is counterproductive  TPaine7   Jul-23-08 02:01 PM   #20 
  - Heller UPHELD the prohibition on ownership by felons.  benEzra   Jul-23-08 02:32 PM   #22 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jul-23-08 07:39 PM   #35 
  - Well we have ppointed it out  tburnsten   Jul-23-08 07:44 PM   #36 
  - Any convicted felon who has has her/his civil rights restored without exception has the legal right  jody   Jul-23-08 08:19 PM   #37 
  - Pennsylvania didn't have any prohibition agains keeping loaded guns at home to begin with  krispos42   Jul-24-08 12:52 AM   #41 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC