You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: Absofuckinglutely is right. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
beevul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Absofuckinglutely is right.
And what in fact has to be done is for the US to adopt firearms control measures equivalent to Canada's.

That's not me saying that. That's you.

Because firearms are one of the most significant forms of payment for Canada's marijuana crop in the US.

No firearms available to pot purchasers in the US to trade for the pot, a lot less pot getting into the US.


All you have to do is get yourselves some gun control, and you'll have a whole lot of fewer problems of all sorts.



Like I said, a gem in the rough.

If canada doesn't want firearms coming in from the US, do what it takes to make it happen, or admit if can't be done, and try something else.

If the US doesn't want MJ coming in from Canada, do what it takes to make it happen, or admit if can't be done, and try something else.

It might make more sense for both sides to legalize pot. We're willing anytime you are. As long as you aren't, stop extraditing Canadians to the US and trying to put them in prison for life for selling mail-order seeds to people in the US, would you?


Legalizing MJ would qualify as something I meant when I said "try something else", and for what its worth, I am 100% with you about marc emery. If the US wants to be that different than its neighbors, the onus is on them to make it so, or admit they can't and try something else, rather than extraditing Canadians to the US and trying to put them in prison for life for selling mail-order seeds to people in the US.


Its not a matter of a place restricting what they or thier neighbors have going out. Its a matter of that place that wants to be different than thier neighbors doing what it takes to make sure that whatever that thing is that they don't want thier people to have access to doesn't come in, or admit it can't be done, and try something else.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -County Board's vote to back gun rights not without controversy beevul  May-21-08 11:03 AM   #0 
  - Sure Chicago is pissed. How do you combat gun crime with such availability?  sharesunited   May-21-08 11:34 AM   #1 
  - Its always somebody elses fault.  beevul   May-21-08 01:48 PM   #3 
  - maybe, just maybe  iverglas   May-21-08 02:04 PM   #4 
     - A gem in the rough...  beevul   May-21-08 02:28 PM   #5 
     - absofuckinglutely  iverglas   May-21-08 02:41 PM   #6 
     - Absofuckinglutely is right.  beevul   May-21-08 03:01 PM   #10 
        - stick to your point, now, eh?  iverglas   May-21-08 03:10 PM   #11 
           - Maybe I didn't make my meaning plain....  beevul   May-21-08 03:20 PM   #13 
              - and just so's mine is  iverglas   May-21-08 04:47 PM   #21 
                 - The end of the world as we know it...  beevul   May-21-08 05:14 PM   #22 
     - You do MJ a terrible injustice when you compare it to the scourge of guns.  sharesunited   May-21-08 03:48 PM   #15 
        - c'mon now!  iverglas   May-21-08 03:52 PM   #17 
        - Did you intend to reply to someone else?  beevul   May-21-08 04:07 PM   #18 
        - Collateral damage  maxidivine   May-22-08 10:47 AM   #24 
     - Sounds great to me  WWFZD   May-21-08 03:35 PM   #14 
  - They could start  maxidivine   May-21-08 02:54 PM   #8 
  - anybody want to produce one of those pretty graphics?  iverglas   May-21-08 11:42 AM   #2 
     - Anybody want to explain what she is inferring?  maxidivine   May-21-08 02:48 PM   #7 
        - infer what you want  iverglas   May-21-08 02:57 PM   #9 
           - Whatever happened to "local" gun control when Chi., D.C. keep going next door?  SteveM   May-21-08 03:20 PM   #12 
           - I dunno ...  iverglas   May-21-08 03:49 PM   #16 
              - Good, So whenever we hear of how local areas should control guns...  SteveM   May-21-08 04:15 PM   #19 
              - I wouldn't know  iverglas   May-21-08 04:20 PM   #20 
                 - Probably so. It seems to be all the rage among gun-controllers here.(nt)  SteveM   May-22-08 02:35 PM   #27 
              - I agree completely  Indy Lurker   May-22-08 11:35 AM   #25 
                 - you seem to have been intending to reply to some other post  iverglas   May-22-08 02:17 PM   #26 
           - Show me  maxidivine   May-22-08 10:41 AM   #23 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC