You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #72: technically [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
72. technically
the article is wrong- it is not an Assault weapon- it does not have a protruding handgrip or flashhider...it actually complies fully with CA assault weapon law- the toughest on the books. IT just goes to show you that the whole "Assault weapon" mantra is a big sham and that it is just an outright attempt to ban semi-autos by looking at what the majority of semi-auto guns had in common cosmetically and banning that. This allows them to say "you can own any semi-auto rifle you want that doesnt have these features- and the reality is that very few semi-auto's do not have these features- and usually those that dont have them get banned by name. its deceitful and plain wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC