jmg257
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-21-08 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 4. Hamilton was in favor of a "select militia", instead of one where everyone was mandated |
|
to serve, and train occcasionally. His vision was more what we have now with the National Guard (other then it was created and is armed by the feds, is part of the army, and the states have very little involvement).
|
| -The pesky meaning of "Well Regulated" |
Elmer1007 |
Feb-21-08 08:49 AM |
#0 |
 -
I missed the last Official State Militia Training date... |
Hobarticus |
Feb-21-08 08:53 AM |
#1 |
  -
You're already in the militia. |
johnbraun |
Feb-21-08 09:46 AM |
#5 |
| -
deleted |
johnbraun |
Feb-21-08 09:48 AM |
#6 |
| -
So, if I'm in the militia... |
Hobarticus |
Feb-21-08 10:46 AM |
#10 |
| -
Nope. It's your responsibility to know the law. |
johnbraun |
Feb-21-08 11:10 AM |
#11 |
| -
LOL! |
Hobarticus |
Feb-21-08 11:12 AM |
#12 |
| -
Laugh if you want, the law is the law. |
johnbraun |
Feb-21-08 11:15 AM |
#13 |
| -
Maybe you should turn me in... |
Hobarticus |
Feb-21-08 11:16 AM |
#14 |
| -
Dude, it doesn't say you have to own a gun. Just that you're in the militia by law. |
johnbraun |
Feb-21-08 11:32 AM |
#15 |
| -
Dude, if I don't own a gun, what good am I in this militia? |
Hobarticus |
Feb-22-08 12:12 AM |
#24 |
| -
Exactly. |
johnbraun |
Feb-22-08 12:29 AM |
#25 |
| -
Crimminy. If you could read you would be dangerous. It says no such thing. |
bluerum |
Feb-21-08 04:56 PM |
#20 |
| -
Although - one could say that part of being a "well regulated" and military |
bluerum |
Feb-21-08 09:01 AM |
#2 |
| -
Hamilton was in favor of a "select militia", instead of one where everyone was mandated |
jmg257 |
Feb-21-08 09:16 AM |
#4 |
| -
And this will be the next anti argument, mark my words. |
johnbraun |
Feb-21-08 09:57 AM |
#8 |
| -
The wording is clear - that there shall BE a well regulated militia to protect |
bluerum |
Feb-21-08 04:52 PM |
#19 |
| -
That is from the Federalist Papers (#29) - not the Constitution or the 2nd amendment, |
jmg257 |
Feb-21-08 08:52 PM |
#23 |
| -
Of course that's what it means. An "effective militia" is necessary, because the recourse is a |
jmg257 |
Feb-21-08 09:09 AM |
#3 |
| -
USC 10.311 places all males 17-45 not in the armed forces in a militia. |
johnbraun |
Feb-21-08 09:49 AM |
#7 |
| -
Yes, Well regulated, as in well functioning |
Indy Lurker |
Feb-21-08 10:44 AM |
#9 |
| -
Maybe I'm confused... |
Plague |
Feb-21-08 02:04 PM |
#16 |
| -
It does seem clear to me as well. |
Indy Lurker |
Feb-21-08 02:28 PM |
#17 |
| -
As I said, USC 10.311 "regulates" the unorganized militia. |
johnbraun |
Feb-21-08 02:32 PM |
#18 |
| -
Righto then. I am in the militia. |
bluerum |
Feb-21-08 04:56 PM |
#21 |
| -
Well regulated, er stated |
WWFZD |
Feb-21-08 06:27 PM |
#22 |
| -
Congress must "provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia". It's derelict in that |
jody |
Feb-22-08 12:53 PM |
#26 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread